url:http://www.magazine.utoronto.ca/phot...nham-badlands-
queenston-shale-mark-shannon-photo/
--
Paul.
CBR1100XX SuperBlackbird (Buen mueble de patio), Orbea Dakar, Legs
BOTAFOT #4 BOTAFOF #30 MRO #24 OMF #15 UKRMMA #30
http://paulc.es/ (content pending)

In article <(E-Mail Removed)>, Paul Carmichael says...
>
> url:http://www.magazine.utoronto.ca/phot...nham-badlands-
> queenston-shale-mark-shannon-photo/

Seems unremarkable to me, apart from the picture in question being
somewhat smaller than the referring url.

--

Pip: Keeper of the Cable Ties

On 28/05/2011 09:36, Paul Carmichael wrote:
> url:http://www.magazine.utoronto.ca/phot...nham-badlands-
> queenston-shale-mark-shannon-photo/

Photoshopped!

I've been to the Cheltenham Badlands and this is more like it

http://flic.kr/p/7gVAzG

--
Gyp

"Paul Carmichael" wrote in message
> url:http://www.magazine.utoronto.ca/phot...nham-badlands-
> queenston-shale-mark-shannon-photo/



Nice, I love HDR.
I tend to really push the HDR so its quite OTT. Not everyones taste
admittedly, a bit like marmite but hey ho!

2 bikers in the Cairngorms. April 2011:

http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/97/bikersx.jpg/

20 mins later a Mustang (I think) ripped through the valley:

http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images...oughcairn.jpg/

Peter

Peter Ackers <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

> "Paul Carmichael" wrote in message
> > url:http://www.magazine.utoronto.ca/phot...nham-badlands-
> > queenston-shale-mark-shannon-photo/
>
>
>
> Nice, I love HDR.
> I tend to really push the HDR so its quite OTT. Not everyones taste
> admittedly, a bit like marmite but hey ho!
>
> 2 bikers in the Cairngorms. April 2011:
>
> http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/97/bikersx.jpg/
>
> 20 mins later a Mustang (I think) ripped through the valley:
>
> http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images...oughcairn.jpg/
>

Can't think why you bothered.

--
BMW K1100LT Ducati 750SS Triumph Street Triple Honda CB400F
Suzuki TS250 Suzuki GN250 chateaudotmurrayatidnetdotcom
Nothing damages a machine more than an ignoramus with a manual, a
can-do attitude and a set of cheap tools

Pip escribió:

> In article <(E-Mail Removed)>, Paul Carmichael says...
>>
>> url:http://www.magazine.utoronto.ca/phot...ek/cheltenham-
badlands-
>> queenston-shale-mark-shannon-photo/
>
> Seems unremarkable to me, apart from the picture in question being
> somewhat smaller than the referring url.
>

Well, a bit back, there was a bit of a rebellion here against tinyurls etc.
It may have been newsreader snobbery, as mine can't handle wrapped urls.
They **** me off, as I have to copy and paste them.

--
Paul.
CBR1100XX SuperBlackbird (Buen mueble de patio), Orbea Dakar, Legs
BOTAFOT #4 BOTAFOF #30 MRO #24 OMF #15 UKRMMA #30
http://paulc.es/ (content pending)

Gyp escribió:

> On 28/05/2011 09:36, Paul Carmichael wrote:
>> url:http://www.magazine.utoronto.ca/phot...ek/cheltenham-
badlands-
>> queenston-shale-mark-shannon-photo/
>
> Photoshopped!
>
> I've been to the Cheltenham Badlands and this is more like it
>
> http://flic.kr/p/7gVAzG
>


Hmm, Whitby eh? Mate of mine just sold his house there. Too grim. And too
many grockles apparently.

--
Paul.
CBR1100XX SuperBlackbird (Buen mueble de patio), Orbea Dakar, Legs
BOTAFOT #4 BOTAFOF #30 MRO #24 OMF #15 UKRMMA #30
http://paulc.es/ (content pending)

Paul Carmichael <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
> Gyp escribió:

> badlands-

> Hmm, Whitby eh? Mate of mine just sold his house there. Too grim. And too
> many grockles apparently.

Err no. Cheltenham.

You put up a link that said Cheltenham Badlands, so I put up a link to
Badlands in Cheltenham.

I thought for once I'd done something straightforward and easily
understood. Apparently not

--
Gyp

Gyp escribió:

> Paul Carmichael <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>> Gyp escribió:
>
>> badlands-
>
>> Hmm, Whitby eh? Mate of mine just sold his house there. Too grim. And too
>> many grockles apparently.
>
> Err no. Cheltenham.
>
> You put up a link that said Cheltenham Badlands, so I put up a link to
> Badlands in Cheltenham.
>
> I thought for once I'd done something straightforward and easily
> understood. Apparently not
>

Yes I know. But the link also pointed to your (or sombody's) photo
collection, which included photos of Whitby.

--
Paul.
CBR1100XX SuperBlackbird (Buen mueble de patio), Orbea Dakar, Legs
BOTAFOT #4 BOTAFOF #30 MRO #24 OMF #15 UKRMMA #30
http://paulc.es/ (content pending)

In article <(E-Mail Removed)>, Paul Carmichael says...
>
> Pip escribió:
>
> > In article <(E-Mail Removed)>, Paul Carmichael says...
> >>
> >> url:http://www.magazine.utoronto.ca/phot...ek/cheltenham-
> badlands-
> >> queenston-shale-mark-shannon-photo/
> >
> > Seems unremarkable to me, apart from the picture in question being
> > somewhat smaller than the referring url.

> Well, a bit back, there was a bit of a rebellion here against tinyurls etc.
> It may have been newsreader snobbery, as mine can't handle wrapped urls.
> They **** me off, as I have to copy and paste them.

The main thrust of my point was the sadly small size of the referred
picture - I mean, if somebody has gone to the lengths of compiling a 54-
shot HDR picture, why reproduce it as a large postage stamp?

As to tinyurls, I think it was the worksurfers who were concerned about
what may have been concelaed behind an anonymous url. This can be
offset by presenting the review function, which doesn't automatically
take the viewer straight to the concealed url, but asks first, having
revealed the real destination.

Having changed newsreaders a couple of times recently, it brings home
how differently they deal with things, and it seems difficult to get to
a size that fits all. Xnews and XanaNews would have taken taht url in
their strides, but Gravity would only click the top line, leaving me to
c'n'p the second line - which is, as you observe, a PITA. Some readers
leave such urls unwrpped, where others insist on breaking them.

Meh. Post and be damned, innit - by 50% of the available readership,
and usually by me ;-)

--

Pip: Keeper of the Cable Ties