George Davis really *is* innocent!

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-13516591

--
Wicked Uncle Nigel - "He's hopeless, but he's honest"

Contains moderate bullshit and simulated opinions.

Wicked Uncle Nigel wrote:
> George Davis really *is* innocent!
>
> http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-13516591

Concealed evidence. What a bunch of conts.

--
Hog

Wicked Uncle Nigel <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
> George Davis really *is* innocent!
>
He was indirectly responsible for the abandonment of a Test match, and
consequently deserves to rot in jail.
--
SD

"Wicked Uncle Nigel" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> George Davis really *is* innocent!
>
> http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-13516591

Is he? That's not what the judge said.

What he *did* say was ""We do not know whether Davis was guilty or not, but
his conviction cannot be said to be safe."

--
Beav

SD wrote:

> Wicked Uncle Nigel <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
> > George Davis really is innocent!
> >
> He was indirectly responsible for the abandonment of a Test match, and
> consequently deserves to rot in jail.

I agree with Nick.

--
Chris

Using the patented Mavis Beacon "Hunt&Peck" Technique, Beav
<(E-Mail Removed)> typed
>
>"Wicked Uncle Nigel" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>> George Davis really *is* innocent!
>>
>> http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-13516591
>
>Is he? That's not what the judge said.
>
>What he *did* say was ""We do not know whether Davis was guilty or not,
>but his conviction cannot be said to be safe."

In which case, that is *exactly* what he said. No safe conviction:
innocent.

--
Wicked Uncle Nigel - "He's hopeless, but he's honest"

Contains moderate bullshit and simulated opinions.

SD <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

> Wicked Uncle Nigel <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
> > George Davis really *is* innocent!
> >
> He was indirectly responsible for the abandonment of a Test match, and
> consequently deserves to rot in jail.

More so because it was one that England could have won in a period of
time when winning was a rarity.

On Tue, 24 May 2011 16:36:06 +0100, Wicked Uncle Nigel
<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

>Using the patented Mavis Beacon "Hunt&Peck" Technique, Beav
><(E-Mail Removed)> typed
>>
>>"Wicked Uncle Nigel" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>>news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>>> George Davis really *is* innocent!
>>>
>>> http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-13516591
>>
>>Is he? That's not what the judge said.
>>
>>What he *did* say was ""We do not know whether Davis was guilty or not,
>>but his conviction cannot be said to be safe."
>
>In which case, that is *exactly* what he said. No safe conviction:
>innocent.

On the other hand, he was provably a scum bag who would certainly have
committed other crimes during the time he was locked up for the one he
says he didn't commit. And he committed one soon after he came out.

**** him.

Neil wrote:
> On Tue, 24 May 2011 16:36:06 +0100, Wicked Uncle Nigel
> <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>
>> Using the patented Mavis Beacon "Hunt&Peck" Technique, Beav
>> <(E-Mail Removed)> typed
>>>
>>> "Wicked Uncle Nigel" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>>> news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>>>> George Davis really *is* innocent!
>>>>
>>>> http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-13516591
>>>
>>> Is he? That's not what the judge said.
>>>
>>> What he *did* say was ""We do not know whether Davis was guilty or
>>> not, but his conviction cannot be said to be safe."
>>
>> In which case, that is *exactly* what he said. No safe conviction:
>> innocent.
>
> On the other hand, he was provably a scum bag who would certainly have
> committed other crimes during the time he was locked up for the one he
> says he didn't commit. And he committed one soon after he came out.
>
> **** him.

Champ, is that you?

--
Hog