taz composed the following ...
>> Whatever braking force you add at the rear will be negated by the lack of
>> grip. So long as the back wheel can lock, you don't really need anymore
>> force. If it can't lock, then there's a serious problem with the brake,
>> and you need to fix that before adding anything.
>>
>> IMHO.
> My rear brake does lock up and I do use is like you suggest
> to aid balance. I was only wondering if it was possible to do,
> only to share the loads of braking out a bit. No other reason.
In that case I'd guess it's possible, see 'petrolcan's' link, but I doubt
it'd work well, or 'share anything out' at all. In fact I don't think that
setup is actually meant to brake, other than in a show .. The amount of
contamination from the chain ring to the brake pads would render them
useless within a very short time.
Actually I don't really understand what you mean by 'sharing the loads of
braking' ... Whatever you do, the rear brake will never [1] slow you down
any more than the front, or even get close to matching the fronts level of
retardation. The front brake _always_ slows the bike more quickly than the
rear will and the front will _always_ have more load on it as a result of
weight transfer etc.
What bike is it for? and where do you ride?
[1] Assuming forward motion ...
--
Paul ...
http://www.4x4prejudice.org/index.php
(8(!) Homer Rules ...

"A tosser is a tosser, no matter what mode of transport they're using."