Mark Olson wrote:

> platypus wrote:
> >
> >"Champ" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>
> > > You can post strings of 1s and 0s if you like.
> >
> > No he ****ing can't. This is a respectable, text-only newsgroup.
>
> 49 20 61 67 72 65 65 20 31 30 30 25 2e

Sad ****er )

--
Chris

"Mark Olson" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed). ..
> platypus wrote:
>>
>> "Champ" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>
>>> Oh, I got it (although, as pointed out elsewhere, it was more Ogden
>>> than you) - it just seemed a bit surreal, for some reason. But it
>>> wasn't just about this post, it was more a general feeling from your
>>> recent output. And anyway, I'm not actually complaining. You can
>>> post strings of 1s and 0s if you like.
>>
>> No he ****ing can't. This is a respectable, text-only newsgroup.
>
> 49 20 61 67 72 65 65 20 31 30 30 25 2e

571

On Mar 16, 2:00*pm, Champ <n...@champ.org.uk> wrote:

> Oh, I got it (although, as pointed out elsewhere, it was more Ogden
> than you)

I'm getting the general message that I'm spending too much time with
him. A solution is at hand, mind.

--
d.

"darsy" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:2299c3bf-9698-48de-b86d-(E-Mail Removed)...
> On Mar 16, 2:00 pm, Champ <n...@champ.org.uk> wrote:
>
>> Oh, I got it (although, as pointed out elsewhere, it was more Ogden
>> than you)
>
> I'm getting the general message that I'm spending too much time with
> him. A solution is at hand, mind.

Will you need an alibi?

On Mar 16, 5:00*pm, "platypus" <monotr...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
> "darsy" <dar...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:2299c3bf-9698-48de-b86d-(E-Mail Removed)...
>
> > On Mar 16, 2:00 pm, Champ <n...@champ.org.uk> wrote:
>
> >> Oh, I got it (although, as pointed out elsewhere, it was more Ogden
> >> than you)
>
> > I'm getting the general message that I'm spending too much time with
> > him. A solution is at hand, mind.
>
> Will you need an alibi?

Several. But from you would probably not be sufficient.

--
d.

Champ wrote:
>
> 01000110011101010110001101101011001000000111100101 10
> 11110111010100101100001000000111100101101111011101 01
> 00100000011001100111010101100011011010110110100101 10
> 11100110011100100000011001100111010101100011011010 11

Oi! No binaries!

--
Antony

On Mar 16, 3:31*pm, Champ <n...@champ.org.uk> wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Mar 2010 15:20:06 GMT, "platypus"
>
> <monotr...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
> >"Champ" <n...@champ.org.uk> wrote in message
> >> You can post strings of 1s and 0s if you like.
>
> >No he ****ing can't. *This is a respectable, text-only newsgroup.
>
> 01000110011101010110001101101011001000000111100101 10111101110101001011000010000001111001011011110111 01010010000001100110011101010110001101101011011010 01011011100110011100100000011001100111010101100011 01101011

and the rest, granddad.

--
d.

Champ wrote:

> On Tue, 16 Mar 2010 14:29:27 -0700 (PDT), antonye <(E-Mail Removed)>
> wrote:
>
> > Champ wrote:
> > >
> >> 01000110011101010110001101101011001000000111100101 10
> >> 11110111010100101100001000000111100101101111011101 01
> >> 00100000011001100111010101100011011010110110100101 10
> >> 11100110011100100000011001100111010101100011011010 11
> >
> > Oi! No binaries!
>
> I was rather hoping someone might figure out what it said...

I did, 'cos I was sad enough to google for a binary-to-English
translator.

Here, have a "LOL!"

--
Chris

On Wed, 17 Mar 2010 10:02:15 +0000, Champ <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

>On Tue, 16 Mar 2010 14:29:27 -0700 (PDT), antonye <(E-Mail Removed)>
>wrote:
>
>>Champ wrote:
>>>
>>> 01000110011101010110001101101011001000000111100101 10
>>> 11110111010100101100001000000111100101101111011101 01
>>> 00100000011001100111010101100011011010110110100101 10
>>> 11100110011100100000011001100111010101100011011010 11
>>
>>Oi! No binaries!
>
>I was rather hoping someone might figure out what it said...

Seems to be missing the last three characters, 'er.'.

On 17 Mar 2010 10:38:36 GMT, "CT" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

>Champ wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 16 Mar 2010 14:29:27 -0700 (PDT), antonye <(E-Mail Removed)>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Champ wrote:
>> > >
>> >> 01000110011101010110001101101011001000000111100101 10
>> >> 11110111010100101100001000000111100101101111011101 01
>> >> 00100000011001100111010101100011011010110110100101 10
>> >> 11100110011100100000011001100111010101100011011010 11
>> >
>> > Oi! No binaries!
>>
>> I was rather hoping someone might figure out what it said...
>
>I did, 'cos I was sad enough to google for a binary-to-English
>translator.

Ha! I had to write one first.