On Wed, 7 Jan 2004 16:29:19 +1030, "tgare" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>The government here in SA i can atleast say is a joke when they talk about
>roadsafety.They get the police to test hundreds of thousands of people
>drinkdriving and catch only a couple.This is waste of time when you consider
>how many people they test to get only a couple of people,usually the dumb
>ones anyway.Dont take this as saying i support drink driving either as i
One could argue that the knowledge that there is a real police presence,
and that there is a pretty good chance that you WILL be tested, has
meant that far fewer people are prepared to take to the roads while at
risk of being done for DUI.
>dont.Then you have speed cameras used as revenue raises,this issue has been
>done to death but its true because they are all in the convenient
>locations,thankfully i havent been done by themNow out of all that wonderful
Everyone knows where they are. Why do people still keep exceeding the
speed limit at these points?
>revenue what percentage goes back into fixing the roads?Judging by the
>conditions of our roads here itd be lucky to be 5%.Over in Perth i noticed
>they have smooth easy traffic.When the roads crack the transport department
>fix them by using this goo to hold the road together and very slippery for
>motorcyclists.I dont ride my bike on wet days,however due to my job as being
>a postie its part of the job.So maybe instead of whining about guys who
>speed by 5-10km they could first pump a little cash into SAs dodgy roads
>before preaching about road safety.Tim
Agreed, to a certain point. Roads that are suitable for cars at a set
speed are not necessarily suitable for motorcycles. However, knowing
that, it would appear prudent for a motorcyclist to take those
conditions into account and adjust his riding accordingly.
It's never always just ONE party at fault.
---
Cheers
PeterC [aka MildThing]
'81 Suzuki GS450-s
'87 BMW K100RT
www.dmcsc.org.au