ts wrote:
> Mark Olson <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>
>> ts wrote:
>>> The Older Gentleman <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Here you go:-
>>>>
>>>> http://www.cmsnl.com/honda-cb400n-19.../partslist/F16.
>>>> html
>>> Thanks. From which I can conclude that there seems to be quite a few
>>> pattern reg-recs offered as "Honda CB250/400" ones . . .
>> Reg/rect units for bikes are among the most brand- and model-agnostic parts
>> on a bike. In other words, nearly any reg/rect with the proper connections
>> and type will interchange.
> (snip lots of further detailed technical info)
>
> Yes, but will a Chinese-made pattern reg/rect that happens to work when
> connected to a CB250 be an as good and long lasting "pattern" substitute
> for my 750?
>
> Without detailed knowledge of reg/rects, I simply follow general
> Ducatisti advice stating that the Honda CB250/400 Superdream ones seem
> to do nicely on the SS. I've not seen anywhere that "any" reg/rect that
> can keep a CB250 charging also is a good pattern unit for the SS.
> IYSWIM.
Of course. Nothing wrong with a CB250/400 reg/rect whatsoever, and
I did not say that there was, nor did I try to dissuade you from
using one.
If you would be so kind as to re-read what I wrote, nowhere did I
say or even imply that a cheap reg/rect will be as good as a high
quality one. All I said was that if the unit is of the proper
type, it will interchange. Not really the same thing at all.
So to restate, by all means, buy a high quality reg/rect from whatever
source tickles your fancy, but be aware that Superdream reg/rects are
nothing special, that is, they aren't any more of a "universal donor"
type than a compatible reg/rect from another marque.
The point I was trying, somewhat unsuccessfully, to make was that you
have more choices available. Not that just any old cheapy chinese
piece of crap reg/rect would be as good as a high quality unit- but
that many more units are compatible than you might think.
Any clearer now?