Motorbike Forums


Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes

I'm surprised this hasn't been commented on yet ...

 
 
Salad Dodger
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      03-14-2010, 08:52 PM
On Sun, 14 Mar 2010 20:44:39 GMT, "Jérémy" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

>Salad Dodger <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in
>news:(E-Mail Removed) :
>
>>>Why doesn't that work for a motorbike?

>>
>> It did, in the eighties.

>
>Funnily enough, that's when I was cycling in London.


I'm surprised we didn't bump into each other.
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Salad Dodger
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      03-14-2010, 08:53 PM
On Sun, 14 Mar 2010 20:37:20 +0000, "sweller"
<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

>SteveH wrote:
>
>> > http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/dri...cle7061168.ece

>>
>> First, they came for the smokers.... then they came for the drinkers....
>>
>> Exactly as predicted by the smokers, then.

>
>You sound quite stupid with the utterly irrelevant Pastor Niemoller quote
>- As an aside the railway has been "zero" since 1992, do you think train
>drivers are being persecuted?


Last time I checked, train driving was a voluntary activity.
 
Reply With Quote
 
Jeremy
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      03-14-2010, 08:57 PM
In article <1jfd3ah.rubmhx55d5e7N%(E-Mail Removed)>,
(E-Mail Removed) says...>
> Jeremy <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>
> > > We are seeing one law after another brought in or amended, all of which
> > > seem to be aimed at dividing and grinding down the population.

> >
> > Is that what the smoking "ban" has done?

>
> It has largely made smoking socially unacceptable - now they're moving
> onto alcohol.


It has largely made pubs and restaurants more pleasant for non-smokers.
I am quite sure it was not aimed at dividing and grinding down the
population.

Unless you're paranoid.

--
jeremy
K1200S
 
Reply With Quote
 
Andy Bonwick
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      03-14-2010, 08:57 PM
On Sun, 14 Mar 2010 20:27:51 +0000, Catman
<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

>Andy Bonwick wrote:
>> On Sun, 14 Mar 2010 20:16:08 +0000, Catman
>> <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>>
>>> SteveH wrote:
>>>> Salad Dodger <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> ... Drivers face ban if they drink a pint
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/dri...cle7061168.ece
>>>> First, they came for the smokers.... then they came for the drinkers....
>>>>
>>>> Exactly as predicted by the smokers, then.
>>> And we haven't finished with them, yet

>>
>> What else can they do? Banning smoking completely will never work
>> because there aren't enough cops in the land to enforce it

>
>True
>
>>and raising
>> taxes even higher just won't work because the majority of smokers are
>> buying duty free tobacco already.

>
>Are they? Genuinely curious as to the accuracy of that.
>

I'm obviously only guessing because there won't be government evidence
to support it

Most smokers I know are on duty free tobacco and it's certainly
readily available in a lot of places. Ok, I work on power stations
frequented by dodgy bastards but the average price for 200 cigarettes
on a power station is about £35 compared to over £50 shop price. The
tax on those cigarettes is going to other countries but if the
government dropped prices to the same level I'd be very surprised if
the overall take dropped.

It's fairly common in the grim north for pub landlords to sell duty
free cigarettes to regulars and I've noticed that a fair number have
removed the cigarette machines because nobody was using them.

>As an ex-smoker[1] I am genuinely stunned by how much I notice people
>smoking now. Especially when, for example, leaving a concert. As soon
>as one gets into the smoking permitted zone, it seems[2] like being back
>in the 'bad old days'
>

I've cut my intake to less than 10 per day but if I smoked at work and
in pubs that'd double. I suspect most other people I know have cut
down by a similar amount.

 
Reply With Quote
 
Andy Bonwick
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      03-14-2010, 09:01 PM
On Sun, 14 Mar 2010 20:52:19 +0000, (E-Mail Removed) (SteveH)
wrote:

>Jeremy <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>
>> > We are seeing one law after another brought in or amended, all of which
>> > seem to be aimed at dividing and grinding down the population.

>>
>> Is that what the smoking "ban" has done?

>
>It has largely made smoking socially unacceptable - now they're moving
>onto alcohol.


I don't think they've made smoking socially unacceptable at all, in
fact it's made people more likely to chat when they're stood outside
smoking.
 
Reply With Quote
 
petrolcan
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      03-14-2010, 09:07 PM
In article <1jfd3ah.rubmhx55d5e7N%(E-Mail Removed)>, SteveH says...
>
> Jeremy <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>
> > > We are seeing one law after another brought in or amended, all of which
> > > seem to be aimed at dividing and grinding down the population.

> >
> > Is that what the smoking "ban" has done?

>
> It has largely made smoking socially unacceptable


Utter shite.

It has made pubs and restaurants far more pleasent places to be and I
say that as a smoker.

 
Reply With Quote
 
Catman
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      03-14-2010, 09:09 PM
Andy Bonwick wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Mar 2010 20:52:19 +0000, (E-Mail Removed) (SteveH)
> wrote:
>
>> Jeremy <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>>
>>>> We are seeing one law after another brought in or amended, all of which
>>>> seem to be aimed at dividing and grinding down the population.
>>> Is that what the smoking "ban" has done?

>> It has largely made smoking socially unacceptable - now they're moving
>> onto alcohol.

>
> I don't think they've made smoking socially unacceptable at all, in
> fact it's made people more likely to chat when they're stood outside
> smoking.


I was thinking something similar. And it *has* made pubs and restaurants
more pleasant for (IMHO) everyone. Even the smokers that I know (who are
few and far between now) claim so.

OTOH walking down a busy street (like Oxford street, for example), or
going to a mainline station seems to have become less pleasant as one
navigates the chatting groups.

YMMV of course.

--
Catman MIB#14 SKoGA#6 TEAR#4 BOTAFOF#38 Apostle#21 COSOC#3
Tyger, Tyger Burning Bright (Remove rust to reply)
116 Giulietta 3.0l Sprint 1.7 GTV TS GT 3.2 V6
Triumph Sprint ST 1050: It's blue, see.
www.cuore-sportivo.co.uk
 
Reply With Quote
 
turby
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      03-14-2010, 09:10 PM
On Mar 14, 12:58*pm, "Dr Zoidberg" <AlexNOOOOO!!!...@drzoidberg.co.uk>
wrote:
> "The Older Gentleman" <totallydeadmail...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in messagenews:1jfcx3s.mpq3tg60nmyoN%totallydeadmailb (E-Mail Removed)...
>
> > Salad Dodger <salad.dod...@idnet.com> wrote:

>
> >> On Sun, 14 Mar 2010 18:08:33 +0000, totallydeadmail...@yahoo.co.uk
> >> (The Older Gentleman) wrote:

>
> >> >Salad Dodger <salad.dod...@idnet.com> wrote:

>
> >> >> ... Drivers face ban if they drink a pint

>
> >> >>http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/dri...cle7061168.ece

>
> >> >*Shrug*

>
> >> >I can't help thinking that if you're going to have a drink-drive policy,
> >> >that should be: "No booze at all. Zero."

>
> > Seriously, I wouldn't have a problem with a zero-tolerance drink driving
> > law. If you know the rules, you can abide by them.

>
> Zero would be far too low.
> The slightest trace of alcohol and you get banned for a year?
> That's not at all proportionate to the hazard you pose.


Besides the fact that people seldom have a zero BAC level. Alcohol is
found in many non-booze foods & medicines. Bread, for example.

 
Reply With Quote
 
SteveH
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      03-14-2010, 09:11 PM
Catman <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

> > I don't think they've made smoking socially unacceptable at all, in
> > fact it's made people more likely to chat when they're stood outside
> > smoking.

>
> I was thinking something similar. And it *has* made pubs and restaurants
> more pleasant for (IMHO) everyone. Even the smokers that I know (who are
> few and far between now) claim so.


It has made my local pubs worse - they're now no longer 'boozers',
they're establishments selling crappy re-heated food and fizzy InBev
shite.

They used to be proper pubs with real ales.
--
SteveH
 
Reply With Quote
 
Catman
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      03-14-2010, 09:13 PM
Andy Bonwick wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Mar 2010 20:27:51 +0000, Catman
> <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>
>> Andy Bonwick wrote:
>>> On Sun, 14 Mar 2010 20:16:08 +0000, Catman
>>> <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>>>
>>>> SteveH wrote:
>>>>> Salad Dodger <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> ... Drivers face ban if they drink a pint
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/dri...cle7061168.ece
>>>>> First, they came for the smokers.... then they came for the drinkers....
>>>>>
>>>>> Exactly as predicted by the smokers, then.
>>>> And we haven't finished with them, yet
>>> What else can they do? Banning smoking completely will never work
>>> because there aren't enough cops in the land to enforce it

>> True
>>
>>> and raising
>>> taxes even higher just won't work because the majority of smokers are
>>> buying duty free tobacco already.

>> Are they? Genuinely curious as to the accuracy of that.
>>

> I'm obviously only guessing because there won't be government evidence
> to support it


Shame. I would be genuinely interested if that were the case.

>
> Most smokers I know are on duty free tobacco and it's certainly
> readily available in a lot of places. Ok, I work on power stations
> frequented by dodgy bastards but the average price for 200 cigarettes
> on a power station is about £35 compared to over £50 shop price. The
> tax on those cigarettes is going to other countries but if the
> government dropped prices to the same level I'd be very surprised if
> the overall take dropped.


I know so few smokers these days. My father, who gets his own duty free
from France. An ex boss, who smokes whatever. Generally buys in the UK,
and my brother in law who tends to switch between duty paid and duty
free, depending on what he can get. Most of the smokers that I knew when
I was working appeared to be smoking duty paid unless they'd been on
holiday. [1]Given that BIL is somewhat of a low life, if *he's* not on
the duty free all the time, I suspect it's not actually that widespread,
but wibble flip do.
>
> It's fairly common in the grim north for pub landlords to sell duty
> free cigarettes to regulars and I've noticed that a fair number have
> removed the cigarette machines because nobody was using them.


Fair enough.

>
>> As an ex-smoker[1] I am genuinely stunned by how much I notice people
>> smoking now. Especially when, for example, leaving a concert. As soon
>> as one gets into the smoking permitted zone, it seems[2] like being back
>> in the 'bad old days'
>>

> I've cut my intake to less than 10 per day but if I smoked at work and
> in pubs that'd double. I suspect most other people I know have cut
> down by a similar amount.


Well I know none of the people listed above have cut down much, if at
all. Or at least claimed not to have.

[1] I used to spend quite a bit of time in the (outside) smoker's corner
as it was a convenient way to get quite time with my then boss. If I
went down more than about 3 times per day, I used to feel it in my
lungs. Which was something of a shock to an ex cigar smoker.


--
Catman MIB#14 SKoGA#6 TEAR#4 BOTAFOF#38 Apostle#21 COSOC#3
Tyger, Tyger Burning Bright (Remove rust to reply)
116 Giulietta 3.0l Sprint 1.7 GTV TS GT 3.2 V6
Triumph Sprint ST 1050: It's blue, see.
www.cuore-sportivo.co.uk
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT. The time now is 07:46 AM.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9