On Jun 1, 5:36*pm, Bruce Richmond <bsr3...@my-deja.com> wrote:
> On Jun 1, 2:45*am, Champ <n...@champ.org.uk> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 31 May 2009 22:20:32 -0700 (PDT), pablo
>
> > <pa...@simplyhombre.net> wrote:
> > >So Stoner gives Ducati another win. Great. Biggest 800 news in Pedrosa
> > >crashing out and somewhat doubtful for his home race in 2 weeks.
>
> > I think this puts Pedrosa out of the championship hunt, but I thought
> > it was a great race, and pretty interesting too. *Amazing to see
> > Melandri leading a race on the Kawasaki, and I felt really sorry for
> > him getting a lowly finish eventually.
>
> Makes me wonder what was so different about the setup of the bikes to
> make him go from hero to zero like that. *At first i thought he didn't
> trust the slicks on a damp track, but there has to be more to it then
> that.
>
> Looks like the Kawasaki is in the ballpark now and just needs a rider
> that can sort it out. *Wonder if Rossi is ready for another
> challenge
Makes one wonder indeed, since this is the bike froma team that gave
up on MotoGP and had never showed much promise. And here they are
doing ok (it's not like they're setting the world on fire). Makes one
wonder how effectively some teams use bigger budgets in MotoGP. The
seceret behind Melandri's performance may well be a combination of
less stress and pressure by being relieved from big expectations, and
yet being with a team that truly works closely together on making the
best out of what they have. On the other end of the spectrums there is
Hayxden, whose season is truning into a huge fiasco and who probably
regrets not having stayed on a Honda. I wonder if that big official
budget is being spent on big budget items ("surely tanzanite sprayed
wolframium forks filled with inert cosmic helium must improve things")
by a technical team convinced they know better than the rider, and
that gamble on big experiments rather than on marginal improvement
stricly based on rider input.