Mark N <(E-Mail Removed)> Mon, 18 Jan 2010 15:14:35
>And sometimes I'm convinced you follow bike racing on television (you
>only rarely seem to actually attend races)
Last year was the first for ages that I didn't get to a WSB or GP race,
it was all BSB. I have a hard time accepting the price for GP and WSB at
Donington clashed with Glastonbury. But BSB, I was at Brands, Donington,
Cadwell and both Oulton Park races.
> and only see what you want to see. Statistics are one of the few
>undeniable realities of racing, and as such are one of the few tools
>available when discussing matters with those who insist on seeing only
>what they want to see...
But selective quoting from stats misses the actual nature of the racing.
Somebody who consistently comes third looks like a loser even if they
were inches off the battle for 1st and 2nd every weekend. If all you do
is compare race wins, you can't see that they were right on the pace.
Then there's the other stories. Rea's 5th is not a bad rookie year. But
actually it included 2 wins and 6 podiums. The first half of the year
was confused by Ten Kate losing their way and then changing their
suspension supplier. He out-rode his two team mates. He's clearly not
afraid to cut inside the stars. So he's now going into a season with
experience, a sorted bike and confidence. So why write him off because
he only got 5th and 2 wins? If you'd followed the racing instead of
obsessing over win ratios, you'd know that.
But then he ain't **** because he ain't American and you're probably
really writing him off because he's from some village in Northern
Ireland.
--
Julian Bond E&MSN: julian_bond at voidstar.com M: +44 (0)77 5907 2173
Webmaster:
http://www.ecademy.com/ T: +44 (0)192 0412 433
Personal WebLog:
http://www.voidstar.com/ skype:julian.bond?chat
The Force Is Strong In This One