"Pietro" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:4b722f4d$0$77590$(E-Mail Removed)...
> "George W Frost" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:FVpcn.6785$(E-Mail Removed)...
>>
>> "captain anchovy" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>> news:03820f77$0$1276$(E-Mail Removed)...
>>> Anyone had a problem with a mobile phone being sent in for repair and
>>> returned with the claim that its "water damaged" ?
>>>
>>> Anchovy, Captain (retired)
>>
>> Not water, but I had a mobile phone which had a cracked screen.
>> Now you may say that it had been treated roughly
>> but, the screen was cracked in the inside screen, not the outside one
>> Nokia and Optarse didn't wan't to have a bar of it
>
> Had a Motorola V9 hinge fail in very normal use.- warranty voided because
> of 'physical damage'. Close inspection showed metal fatigue and the small
> plastic pieces inside showed no damage - but warranty was still not
> honoured, despite calls to the Motorola head office.
>
> I refused to pay, and went and got a new phone -not a Motorola - and
> strangely none of the 50+ phones in our fleet are Motorola anymore.
>
> They couln't seem to get the concept that 'physical damage <=> abuse by
> user'.
>
> Pietro
>
When I went into Optarse, trying top get a new phone, The sales girl went
out the back to speak to the manager and told him of my concerns, and I
heard him say very loudly
"This was caused by consumer abuse and not a warranty issue"
I called out even louder for him to come out into the store and I would show
him what "consumer abuse" was
Strangely enough he didn''t.
I didn't get a new phone from them and bought one somewhere else
|