Motorbike Forums


Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes

Review on SMH

 
 
TimC
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      09-27-2011, 02:37 AM
I was surprised to see this review on the front page of smh.com.au:

http://smh.drive.com.au/bike-reviews...921-1kkmd.html

I bought the right bike

(and this:
http://smh.drive.com.au/bike-reviews...921-1kkin.html
)

(who is this Trevor Hedge bloke, and how do I get steal his job? Look
at this:
http://smh.drive.com.au/photogallery...electedImage=1
how beautiful is that!?)



--
TimC
hey Beavis, we're segfaulting, heh heh heh, I know, Butthead, so let's
SIGBUS from inside the handler, heh heh heh --Stephen J. Turnbull
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
thefathippy
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      09-28-2011, 12:53 AM
On Sep 27, 12:37*pm, TimC <tconn...@rather.puzzling.no-spam-accepted-
here.org> wrote:
> I was surprised to see this review on the front page of smh.com.au:
>
> http://smh.drive.com.au/bike-reviews...le-black-20110...
>
> I bought the right bike
>
> (and this:http://smh.drive.com.au/bike-reviews...zuki-bandit-12...
> )
>
> (who is this Trevor Hedge bloke, and how do I get steal his job? *Look
> at this:http://smh.drive.com.au/photogallery...le-black-20110...
> how beautiful is that!?)
>
> --
> TimC
> hey Beavis, we're segfaulting, heh heh heh, I know, Butthead, so let's
> SIGBUS from inside the handler, heh heh heh --Stephen J. Turnbull


It does look nice, but...

I'm not big enough to use one as intended. I thought my 1992 R100GS
was too big, and it was a minibike in comparison to current models.
Getting bogged in deep sand in Goulburn River NP made me wonder if I
was ever going to get out again! Add panniers, top box and various
accessories, and they're big muthas.

Mind you, a claimed wet weight of 229kg isn't much more than the
R100GS' wet weight, (around 220 kg, IIRC - googles at 210kg) so what
would I know? ;^)

Even the 800s are heavier than they should be, IMHO. Sub-200 kg might
get me seriously interested.

That said, I'm sure you'll love it, I loved mine, even though it was
purple, and only sold it because it was getting old, and then I
snapped the driveshaft (just riding along, apparently quite common on
high mileage (130k kms) GSs of that vintage).

....and I'm not at all jealous. ;^)

Tony F
 
Reply With Quote
 
TimC
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      09-28-2011, 01:35 AM
On 2011-09-28, thefathippy (aka Bruce)
was almost, but not quite, entirely unlike tea:
> On Sep 27, 12:37Â*pm, TimC <tconn...@rather.puzzling.no-spam-accepted-
> here.org> wrote:
>> I was surprised to see this review on the front page of smh.com.au:
>>
>> http://smh.drive.com.au/bike-reviews...le-black-20110...
>>
>> I bought the right bike

....
> It does look nice, but...
>
> I'm not big enough to use one as intended. I thought my 1992 R100GS
> was too big, and it was a minibike in comparison to current models.
> Getting bogged in deep sand in Goulburn River NP made me wonder if I
> was ever going to get out again! Add panniers, top box and various
> accessories, and they're big muthas.


I rode a '97 R100GS PD around Europe, and it was so much less refined
than my '10 R1200GS. The whole 60km/h front end wobble if I took a
hand off the handlebars was kinda worrying. Take 3kg out of the
topbox, and the wobble at least stayed in check when I had both hands
on the bars, but changing the reserve taps at 160km/h on an autobahn
was an excercise in fun and causing 3 lanes of traffic jam. Stick a
80kg rider on the bike instead of my puny 64kg, and no sign of wobble
at all, regardless of what was in the topbox. I needed a 16kg
weissbeer belly.

But yeah, I wouldn't consider taking the '97 on dirt, given my build.
But I have no problem taking the '10 on dirt. Well, apart from the
times I have come off it. That reminds me, I should book the offroad
course...

Sand should be good! Dig deep enough down into it, and your feet can
reach the ground! Same goes for excess weight in the panniers

Still watching long-way-round. Charlie eventually discovers the hard
way that he should dump a few kg from the panniers...

> Mind you, a claimed wet weight of 229kg isn't much more than the
> R100GS' wet weight, (around 220 kg, IIRC - googles at 210kg) so what
> would I know? ;^)


It's no prob on the go. It's barely a prob in the city.

> Even the 800s are heavier than they should be, IMHO. Sub-200 kg might
> get me seriously interested.


The 650-cum-800 I also rode around Europe was roughly the same weight,
but it was almost as fun to ride on the tarmac. It's seat is made of
marble though. Glad I brought along the airhawk.

The real 650 from a few years ago also didn't have a brilliant seat,
and the single pot makes your nuts go numb after a while. But still a
fun bike! Still just as heavy.

> That said, I'm sure you'll love it, I loved mine, even though it was
> purple, and only sold it because it was getting old, and then I
> snapped the driveshaft (just riding along, apparently quite common on
> high mileage (130k kms) GSs of that vintage).


The '97 PD was a borrowed-friend-of-a-friend's bike that had joined
the 100kk club (his main bike had joined the 200kk club). 2 days into
the 8000km on it, I turned up at our mutual friend's place, and he had
a good look over it. Turned out the throttle cables were about to
snap. It drank a lot of oil, which I wasn't used to, so forgot to
check it for a bit of a while (oops!). It was thirsty on the dinosaur
juice. And then the clutch cable half snapped at the top of Alpe
d'Huez. And the battery flattened which exhibited itself in a
horrible mechanical sound when the starter didn't engage properly (a
new battery was a lot cheaper than my expectation of needing to pay
for a new ringgear or gearbox!). So it was definitely showing signs of
age. But fortunately, the shaft was still good.

Next time I go with a hire bike for the entire duration with 3000k on
the clock

> ...and I'm not at all jealous. ;^)


Good!

--
TimC
A smoking section in a restaurant is like a peeing section in a
swimming pool. --Sheldon Brown
 
Reply With Quote
 
rockit
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      09-29-2011, 11:12 AM
On Sep 27, 12:37*pm, TimC <tconn...@rather.puzzling.no-spam-accepted-
here.org> wrote:
> I was surprised to see this review on the front page of smh.com.au:
>
> http://smh.drive.com.au/bike-reviews...le-black-20110...
>
> I bought the right bike
>
> (and this:http://smh.drive.com.au/bike-reviews...zuki-bandit-12...
> )
>
> (who is this Trevor Hedge bloke, and how do I get steal his job? *Look
> at this:http://smh.drive.com.au/photogallery...le-black-20110...
> how beautiful is that!?)
>
> --
> TimC
> hey Beavis, we're segfaulting, heh heh heh, I know, Butthead, so let's
> SIGBUS from inside the handler, heh heh heh --Stephen J. Turnbull


Trevor Hedge . . see MCNEWS.com.au
 
Reply With Quote
 
Lars Chance
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      09-29-2011, 12:03 PM
On 29/09/2011 9:12 PM, rockit wrote:
> On Sep 27, 12:37 pm, TimC<tconn...@rather.puzzling.no-spam-accepted-
> here.org> wrote:


>> (who is this Trevor Hedge bloke, and how do I get steal his job? Look
>> at this:http://smh.drive.com.au/photogallery...le-black-20110...
>> how beautiful is that!?)

>
> Trevor Hedge . . see MCNEWS.com.au
>

Trevor used to be an Ausmotian too.
That was then.... (sadly) this is now.
--
LC

 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Silverstone Arena GP Circuit - A review Ben UK Motorcycles 40 05-05-2011 07:37 AM
Nolan N90 mini review (longish) TMack UK Motorcycles 12 10-07-2010 10:48 PM
MotoGP mini review ogden UK Motorcycles 18 09-20-2010 09:17 PM
Pro Bolt Kit Mini Review SteveH UK Motorcycles 5 09-13-2010 06:49 AM
Manchester weekend - short review. A.Lee UK Motorcycles 6 08-04-2010 04:37 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:09 AM.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9