Tony Wang declares that he'll pass user details on if requested by the
legalites regarding the super injunction fracass.
Serves the idiots right if they trust uncontrolled organisations like
Twitter, Facebook and the like with their personal details in the first
place.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-13546847

Mind ewe, I think the planks that want to hide behind the law deserve
all they get when it does and will come out in the public domain!

By cunning use of feral apostrophes?

--
Malc

You can purchase anything you desire from Gray Alys
But it is better not to

Greybeard ((E-Mail Removed)) wrote:
>
> Tony Wang declares that he'll pass user details on if requested by the
> legalites regarding the super injunction fracass.
> Serves the idiots right if they trust uncontrolled organisations like
> Twitter, Facebook and the like with their personal details in the first
> place.

There's only really one account that's particularly relevant and that's
@injunctionsuper. If that wasn't set up by someone using a disposable
email address in a backstreet net cafe, I'll be amazed.

And then, of course, there's Giles Coren. He really might live to regret
that one.

--
ogden

gsxr1000 - the gentleman's sports-tourer
ktm duke - the practical cross-town commuter

In article <irjeku$c2g$(E-Mail Removed)>, (E-Mail Removed)
says...
>
> By cunning use of feral apostrophes?

and I really give a hoot!

In article <(E-Mail Removed)>,
(E-Mail Removed) says...
>
> Greybeard ((E-Mail Removed)) wrote:
> >
> > Tony Wang declares that he'll pass user details on if requested by the
> > legalites regarding the super injunction fracass.
> > Serves the idiots right if they trust uncontrolled organisations like
> > Twitter, Facebook and the like with their personal details in the first
> > place.
>
> There's only really one account that's particularly relevant and that's
> @injunctionsuper. If that wasn't set up by someone using a disposable
> email address in a backstreet net cafe, I'll be amazed.
>
> And then, of course, there's Giles Coren. He really might live to regret
> that one.

That's all probably very true, but I'd be buggered if I'd put my details
on ANY public forum in that manner.
Some people are just so damned gullible :-)

On Wed, 25 May 2011 18:12:21 +0100, Greybeard <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

>Tony Wang declares that he'll pass user details on if requested by the
>legalites regarding the super injunction fracass.
>Serves the idiots right if they trust uncontrolled organisations like
>Twitter, Facebook and the like with their personal details in the first
>place.
>
>http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-13546847
>
>Mind ewe, I think the planks that want to hide behind the law deserve
>all they get when it does and will come out in the public domain!

Personally I don't see how this is Twitter shafting its users. Twitter
is simply a carrier of the data, the users shafted themselves by not
understanding their own culpability in using a communications service.

On Thu, 26 May 2011 00:30:02 +0100, ginge
<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

>On Wed, 25 May 2011 18:12:21 +0100, Greybeard <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>
>>Tony Wang declares that he'll pass user details on if requested by the
>>legalites regarding the super injunction fracass.
>>Serves the idiots right if they trust uncontrolled organisations like
>>Twitter, Facebook and the like with their personal details in the first
>>place.
>>
>>http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-13546847
>>
>>Mind ewe, I think the planks that want to hide behind the law deserve
>>all they get when it does and will come out in the public domain!
>
>Personally I don't see how this is Twitter shafting its users. Twitter
>is simply a carrier of the data, the users shafted themselves by not
>understanding their own culpability in using a communications service.

Thing is, Twitter, at least in the UK, isn't a carrier. It's a
publisher.
--
GSX-R1000 K8

ginge <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

> On Wed, 25 May 2011 18:12:21 +0100, Greybeard <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>
> >Tony Wang declares that he'll pass user details on if requested by the
> >legalites regarding the super injunction fracass.
> >Serves the idiots right if they trust uncontrolled organisations like
> >Twitter, Facebook and the like with their personal details in the first
> >place.
> >
> >http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-13546847
> >
> >Mind ewe, I think the planks that want to hide behind the law deserve
> >all they get when it does and will come out in the public domain!
>
> Personally I don't see how this is Twitter shafting its users. Twitter
> is simply a carrier of the data, the users shafted themselves by not
> understanding their own culpability in using a communications service.

My view is that Ryan Giggs is a ****ing idiot if he thinks he can nail
everyone who shared the information on Twitter.

Andy B wrote:
> ginge <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 25 May 2011 18:12:21 +0100, Greybeard <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>>
>>> Tony Wang declares that he'll pass user details on if requested by
>>> the legalites regarding the super injunction fracass.
>>> Serves the idiots right if they trust uncontrolled organisations
>>> like Twitter, Facebook and the like with their personal details in
>>> the first place.
>>>
>>> http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-13546847
>>>
>>> Mind ewe, I think the planks that want to hide behind the law
>>> deserve all they get when it does and will come out in the public
>>> domain!
>>
>> Personally I don't see how this is Twitter shafting its users.
>> Twitter is simply a carrier of the data, the users shafted
>> themselves by not understanding their own culpability in using a
>> communications service.
>
> My view is that Ryan Giggs is a ****ing idiot if he thinks he can nail
> everyone who shared the information on Twitter.

I expect he only needs to nail one for everyone else to become rather
careful.

--
Hog

In article <1k1v75u.18q7jw91qoo0e7N%(E-Mail Removed)>,
(E-Mail Removed) says...
>
> ginge <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 25 May 2011 18:12:21 +0100, Greybeard <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
> >
> > >Tony Wang declares that he'll pass user details on if requested by the
> > >legalites regarding the super injunction fracass.
> > >Serves the idiots right if they trust uncontrolled organisations like
> > >Twitter, Facebook and the like with their personal details in the first
> > >place.
> > >
> > >http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-13546847
> > >
> > >Mind ewe, I think the planks that want to hide behind the law deserve
> > >all they get when it does and will come out in the public domain!
> >
> > Personally I don't see how this is Twitter shafting its users. Twitter
> > is simply a carrier of the data, the users shafted themselves by not
> > understanding their own culpability in using a communications service.
>
> My view is that Ryan Giggs is a ****ing idiot if he thinks he can nail
> everyone who shared the information on Twitter.

So do I.
Just coz he's got more money than brains he shouldn't have the
opportunity to hide behind the law.