On Wed, 10 Mar 2010 20:03:34 -0800 (PST), Thomas <(E-Mail Removed)>
wrote:
>On Mar 10, 5:47*pm, Kevin Gleeson <kevinglee...@imagine-it.com.au>
>wrote:
>> On Wed, 10 Mar 2010 05:54:55 +0000, Catman
>>
>>
>>
>> <cat...@rustcuore-sportivo.co.uk> wrote:
>> >Kevin Gleeson wrote:
>> >> On Tue, 09 Mar 2010 06:59:32 +0000, Catman
>> >> <cat...@rustcuore-sportivo.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>> >>> Kevin Gleeson wrote:
>> >>>> On Tue, 9 Mar 2010 01:55:59 +0100, "Giles" <gi...@telecom.com> wrote:
>>
>> >>>>> Strange happenings at the petrol station
>> >>>>>http://www.crazy-video-streaming.com...happenings.htm
>> >>>> I don't get it . . .
>>
>> >>> Tyres to reduce fuel consumption.
>>
>> >> That's a pretty vague link.
>>
>> >The Michelin logo didn't give it away, at all?
>>
>> No, not really. And I've workd in advertising for 30 years.
>>
>> That looked like an ad agency Creative Director sitting around the
>> board table having a wank with the clients to me. I like clever
>> commercials, but that had little link their product. **** ad as far as
>> I am concerned. OK, the director wanted to be Steven Spielberg, but I
>> reckon it won't sell.
>>
>> You can be clever and have remote links to products (Briitish Airways
>> ad from a few years ago that had no aircraft in the ad is perfect
>> example) but I think that was crap. Unless I am missing a British
>> sense of humour or a regional situation that I am not picking up on.
>
>I saw the logo and figured it was chapter one in a series of ads.
>What else could it be than an ad?
I just thought it was silly. If they have to try and be that clever
these days (and I haven't owned a TV for a decade) then I think there
is a lot of plot-losing in the ad agencies. I tend to be very good at
igmoring advertising,even though I have spent most of my working life
creating it, it just came across to me as someone being a wanker. Ads
have to grab your attention towards the product. That was nicely shot,
nicely directed, but **** at promoting the product I reckon. You might
as well just put a Michelin logo on screen with no sound for 30
seconds and I think that would have grabbed as much attention and cost
a shitload less to create.
Kev