On 19/05/2011 12:15, Krusty wrote:
> Stephen wrote:
>
>> On May 19, 11:27 am, Jim<n...@0.0.0.0> wrote:
>>
>>> This. Tablets are still in their early generations, which means
>>> there's a lot of work needed to design& test the PCB and
>>> mechanical design: there's a lot of interesting analogue
>>> (touchscreens, audio, battery and power management) and radio (3g,
>>> wifi and the associated aerials) stuff to get right as well. Which
>>> is why not many manufacturers have managed to do it right yet and
>>> they can charge a premium.
>>
>> In a quiet voice I'm tempted to say Apple have got it pretty close to
>> 'right' at the moment.
>>
>> When I first saw an iPad I didn't understand why you'd want it.
>
> I've always understood why some people would want one, but I already
> get frustrated with lack of screel estate[1] on a laptop so I can't see
> me getting one.
I just plug in an extra monitor when in the office. At home I find
multiple desktops works just fine.
>
> [1] I just made that up[2]. How wanky is that?
> [2] Which doesn't mean somebody else didn't first, but icba to check.
>
They did.
--
Catman MIB#14 SKoGA#6 TEAR#4 BOTAFOF#38 Apostle#21 COSOC#3
Tyger, Tyger Burning Bright (Remove rust to reply)
116 Giulietta 3.0l Sprint 1.7 GTV TS GT 3.2 V6
Triumph Sprint ST 1050: It's blue, see.
#
www.cuore-sportivo.co.uk