A Troubling Question

In a relativistic sense only, but why waste a perfectly good pedantic rant?

Jim

 

Be still! and revere JF, who blessed us with their presence on 31 Oct
2005...

Is that the best you can do these days, Follett?

--
1> Peter Parsnip
2> Compliance
3> Further compliance
4> At the limit of compliance
5> Non-compliant. As always.

 

Be still! and revere mimus, who blessed us with their presence on 31 Oct
2005...

I have just noticed that, once again, a Flonker has snecked groups.

The Flonk is dead. Pathetic.

--
1> Peter Parsnip
2> Compliance
3> Further compliance
4> At the limit of compliance
5> Non-compliant. As always.

 

Be still! and revere gadge, who blessed us with their presence on 01 Nov
2005...

Crossposted so others can view the discussion.

--
1> Peter Parsnip
2> Compliance
3> Further compliance
4> At the limit of compliance
5> Non-compliant. As always.

 

Be still! and revere dave, who blessed us with their presence on 01 Nov
2005...

Tut tut. Just leave the cross-posts in, otherwise you're talking to no
one. I assume you actually want people to respond to your point?

--
1> Peter Parsnip
2> Compliance
3> Further compliance
4> At the limit of compliance
5> Non-compliant. As always.

 

Be still! and revere Grumps, who blessed us with their presence on 01 Nov
2005...

Once again, there is no point giving us your opinion if you sneck the
froupline.

Perhaps you don't want people to challenge your opinions? If so, then you
are pathetic.

--
1> Peter Parsnip
2> Compliance
3> Further compliance
4> At the limit of compliance
5> Non-compliant. As always.

 

Be still! and revere mimus, who blessed us with their presence on 01 Nov
2005...

That's right. The Flonk is little more than a Members Only clique.

--
1> Peter Parsnip
2> Compliance
3> Further compliance
4> At the limit of compliance
5> Non-compliant. As always.

 

Be still! and revere Grumps, who blessed us with their presence on 01 Nov
2005...

I don't have one. I'm looking for more information on the subject, and
looking for other people's thoughts.

--
1> Peter Parsnip
2> Compliance
3> Further compliance
4> At the limit of compliance
5> Non-compliant. As always.

 

On Tue, 1 Nov 2005 18:21:16 +0000 (UTC), in
alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk,

then who the **** let ~you~ in here, hmmm, whiner?

<dials cops>
--
dave hillstrom

Vote Dave Hillstrom for Whining Whinger in AUK October 2005

the belgians are STILL thieves.

 

Be still! and revere dave hillstrom, who blessed us with their presence
on 01 Nov 2005...

I have privileges everywhere.

--
1> Peter Parsnip
2> Compliance
3> Further compliance
4> At the limit of compliance
5> Non-compliant. As always.

 

On Tue, 1 Nov 2005 23:37:47 +0000 (UTC), in
alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk,

i must decline commenting on this fine setup line as it poses so many
options.
--
dave hillstrom

Vote Dave Hillstrom for Whining Whinger in AUK October 2005

the belgians are STILL thieves.

 

Be still! and revere dave hillstrom, who blessed us with their presence
on 02 Nov 2005...

Wimp.

--
1> Peter Parsnip
2> Compliance
3> Further compliance
4> At the limit of compliance
5> Non-compliant. As always.

 

Possibly, as a standard DVD is limited to 4.7 GB. 6 GB of data can be
loaded onto a Dual Layer DVD, which I suppose might weigh slightly more than
the former. My scales are only accurate to + or - 5 gm and can't tell the
difference between the two. And in fact the weights of the disks, as CDs
and DVDs are read on the same drive nowadays, probably have to comply with
an international set of standards set by the manufacturers which no doubt
include maximum and minimum weights.

 

On Wed, 2 Nov 2005 07:49:28 +0000 (UTC), in
alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk,

be nice, or i will be forced to box you about the head and body till you
bleed.
--
dave hillstrom

Vote Dave Hillstrom for Whining Whinger in AUK October 2005

the belgians are STILL thieves.

 

Be still! and revere dave hillstrom, who blessed us with their presence
on 02 Nov 2005...

I don't believe you.

--
1> Peter Parsnip
2> Compliance
3> Further compliance
4> At the limit of compliance
5> Non-compliant. As always.

 

On Wed, 2 Nov 2005 20:47:53 +0000 (UTC), in
alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk,

they didnt believe chicken little, either, and see what happened to them!
--
dave hillstrom

Vote Dave Hillstrom for Whining Whinger in AUK October 2005

the belgians are STILL thieves.

 

Be still! and revere dave hillstrom, who blessed us with their presence
on 02 Nov 2005...

Yet that was no excuse for turning into a film. **** off, Disney.

--
1> Peter Parsnip
2> Compliance
3> Further compliance
4> At the limit of compliance
5> Non-compliant. As always.

 

On Thu, 3 Nov 2005 09:10:54 +0000 (UTC), in
alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk,

you love disney. i know you do. theyre evil, after all.
--
dave hillstrom

Vote Dave Hillstrom for Whining Whinger in AUK October 2005

the belgians are STILL thieves.

 

This thread must weigh a bit.

--
Phil Kyle™

http://philkyle2003.reachme.at/

"The truly racist person is one Helene Rudlin, who admits it."
- Neil Barker <[email protected]>

"I wonder - is there perhaps some form of cosmetic surgery we can pay for,
so that Helene can actually become a coon ?"
- Neil Barker <[email protected]>

 

On Fri, 4 Nov 2005 22:45:33 +0000 (UTC), in
alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk,

but on what surface? oh, the gravity of the subject.
--
dave hillstrom

Vote Dave Hillstrom for Whining Whinger in AUK October 2005

the belgians are STILL thieves.