and these guys run nuclear power stations....

Discussion in 'UK Motorcycles' started by Simon Wilson, Dec 6, 2009.

  1. Simon Wilson

    Andy Bonwick Guest

    You're quite a funny bloke when you want to be.
     
    Andy Bonwick, Dec 8, 2009
    1. Advertisements

  2. Simon Wilson

    M J Carley Guest

    It's a serious statement: the problem at the moment is that nobody
    really knows what it costs to build a nuclear power station.
     
    M J Carley, Dec 8, 2009
    1. Advertisements



  3. $180
     
    Stupendous Man, Dec 8, 2009
  4. Simon Wilson

    Jim Guest

    I'm not sure that you're correct.

    If we applied this thinking to all decisions nothing would ever get done
    - we'd spend all our time trying to estimate the impact over the rest of
    history.

    And it's quite disingenuous to attach this thinking to nuclear power
    when we quite happily build wind turbines or hydro schemes with little
    idea of the eventual return on expenditure or environmental impact.
     
    Jim, Dec 8, 2009
  5. Simon Wilson

    Ace Guest

    Is that supposed to be a question?

    It's in full pre-xmas regalia right now, with carols being sung last
    night outside the hotel (in Union Sq, so pretty much the middle of
    things) and everything else you'd expect.
     
    Ace, Dec 8, 2009
  6. Simon Wilson

    'Hog Guest

    But this appears to be true of all huge infrastructure investments. The
    consumer prices can be adjusted at future values to cope.

    The financial industry bailout proves that we could fund proper
    infrastructure if we had political will.

    PFI (1) underpins it. A current expert panel assert the need and the
    solution. The next govmint contracts it at agreed price. The next 6-12
    govmints have to make sure it is paid for. Multiple generations of
    citizens get guaranteed benefits.

    (1) No *please* don't argue PFI with me, it required COMPETENT contract
    formulation.
     
    'Hog, Dec 8, 2009
  7. Simon Wilson

    M J Carley Guest

    So why do they get the costs wrong? The Channel Tunnel Rail Link was
    built on-time and on-budget. Why is the civil nuclear industry unable
    to make as good an estimate of time and cost as the rest of civil
    engineering?
    I meant that nobody knows how much it costs to *build* the power
    station; nobody cares what disposal and storage costs are because
    governments pick up the tab on that.
    After fifty-odd years, we should have an idea of the cost of building
    a power station---we don't. We *do* have a good estimate of what it
    costs, and how long it takes, to put up a wind turbine.
     
    M J Carley, Dec 8, 2009
  8. Simon Wilson

    'Hog Guest

    Well I love it and I'm not sure why you wouldn't.
     
    'Hog, Dec 8, 2009
  9. [...]
    Well, it turns nobody really knew what it cost to build a coal power
    station either.

    Unless you mean "nuke power plants are notoriously overbudget", which
    is a problem of government procurement in general and applies to
    lots of things, not only nuclear power plants. Japanese and French
    seem to be able to build nukes within the estimated and allocated budget.
     
    Leszek Karlik, Dec 8, 2009
  10. Simon Wilson

    Jérémy Guest

    (M J Carley) wrote in
    Enrico Fermi. Although I wouldn't have liked to be there.
     
    Jérémy, Dec 8, 2009
  11. Simon Wilson

    'Hog Guest

    I thought the Tunnel and associated rail links went hugely over time and
    budget and have struggled to survive as a result?
     
    'Hog, Dec 8, 2009
  12. [...]
    And Polish highways are notoriously late and over budget. :)
    Do you claim that _all_ civil engineering projects except nuclear
    engineering
    are always on time and within budget?

    Some civil engineering projects are on time and within budget, but then
    again, so are some nuclear power plants.

    [...]
    This is patently false. Nobody can be sure how much it costs to
    build _some_ power stations. Just like with every large scale
    engineering projects.

    [...]
    In case of wind turbines what we don't know is what the power is going
    to cost in the long run. What will be the influence of giant wind turbine
    farms on weather patterns? Paving the earth with wind turbines with
    an output comparable to nuke plants could have some repercussions, and
    a change in weather patterns could drive the cost of power upwards by
    a significant amount.

    BTW, do you have some sources that show that wind turbines are never
    over budget and late? :) Because it seems a bit suspicious, claiming
    that one kind of civil engineering projects is immune to problems
    with scheduling and budgeting.

    Quick googling shows one project for a wind turbine that ended up
    costing 1 million USD, while the budgeted cost was 600 thousand USD.
    Well, it's only 65% over budget or so, so you're quite right, it's
    almost like it was built within budget. Not. :))

    (http://www.abc.net.au/news/video/2009/12/04/2762742.htm)
     
    Leszek Karlik, Dec 8, 2009
  13. [...]
    Only 80% over budget or so, according to the wikipedia.

    So, almost not like nuclear power plants. ;-)
     
    Leszek Karlik, Dec 8, 2009
  14. Simon Wilson

    M J Carley Guest

    No, but you knew that. The point is that the nuclear industry *always*
    needs a massive subsidy and usually runs over time and budget.
    Which ones?
    That has nothing to do with the cost of any given installation.
    I didn't say they were *never* over budget or late; I said you know
    what they cost. Cost prediction for nuclear plants is a bit of a joke
    on the other hand.

    These guys claim their coal plants were on time and budget:

    http://www.power-technology.com/projects/majuba/

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yallourn_Power_Station,_Victoria

    likewise, this power station upgrade:

    http://www.theengineer.co.uk/news/p...time-on-budget-and-up-to-speed/309764.article
    http://www.bp.com/genericarticle.do?categoryId=9024973&contentId=7046495
     
    M J Carley, Dec 8, 2009
  15. Simon Wilson

    M J Carley Guest

    You reckon?

    University of Greenwich professor of energy studies Stephen Thomas
    said industry journal Nucleonics Week had cited a number of problems
    and issues with welds in the steel liner of the containment building
    and errors in the installation of steel reinforcement (see box).

    French nuclear power regulator Autorité de Sûreté Nucléaire also
    halted concrete pouring work for three weeks between June and July
    last year citing \u201cinsufficient project organisation\u201d.

    \u201cThe original stated costs were \u20ac3.3bn [£2.8bn], but these
    costs were re-stated in December to \u20ac4bn [£3.4bn], so they
    could say that they are running to budget,\u201d said
    Thomas. \u201cBut it is not the original budget. You can\u2019t keep
    re-writing history.\u201d Construction at Flamanville began in July
    2006 and was scheduled to last for 54 months.

    http://www.nce.co.uk/news/energy/ed...ver-flamanville-nuclear-plant/5203617.article
     
    M J Carley, Dec 8, 2009
  16. Simon Wilson

    M J Carley Guest

    The Channel Tunnel Rail Link (High Speed One) was on time and on budget.
     
    M J Carley, Dec 8, 2009
  17. Simon Wilson

    Andy Bonwick Guest

    snip>
    We already know that they're proving to be a bit 'fragile' when used
    in the UK but that's not going to stop this country using them as a
    stop-gap measure until the new nukes come on line.

    Cost? I'll leave that to people who can read crystal balls and predict
    the future.
     
    Andy Bonwick, Dec 8, 2009
  18. Simon Wilson

    Andy Bonwick Guest

    So are the preparations for the 2012 Olympics, it's just that the
    budget's been revised.
     
    Andy Bonwick, Dec 8, 2009
  19. Simon Wilson

    Andy Bonwick Guest

    On Tue, 8 Dec 2009 15:24:19 GMT, (M J Carley) wrote:

    snip>
    I don't think replacing worn out governor control systems is that big
    a thing to brag about.

    I can think of a power station that carried out a major upgrade of the
    HP & IP turbines on one of its units and mothballed all the equipment
    for doing the second one after the first build went massively over
    budget and started up 4 months late.

    The biggest problem was that they were trying to polish a turd rather
    than squeeze out a fresh one.
     
    Andy Bonwick, Dec 8, 2009
  20. Simon Wilson

    boots Guest

    Isn't this because they actually do have a pretty good idea but no one
    wants to mention it when trying to get government money so costs and
    timescales are graphite equalised[1]. Hence pretty well everything
    ends up costing more and taking longer than the original estimate.
    Once it's being built though it's then too expensive not to finish.

    [1] A lovely expression from the days of broadcast speech circuits, if
    the figures don't look right then put in some that do.
     
    boots, Dec 8, 2009
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.