Beer witchlet and Wintersun

Discussion in 'Australian Motorcycles' started by bikerbetty, May 16, 2008.

  1. bikerbetty

    atec77 Guest

    Considering the erosion of civil liberties involved now is not a great
    time for levity , it might even effect the old farts and youngsters on
    jappas .
     
    atec77, May 19, 2008
    #21
    1. Advertisements

  2. In aus.motorcycles on Mon, 19 May 2008 09:45:54 +1000
    It has a very good chance of affecting anyone who associates with
    anyone who associates with people who might be members of an
    organisation that becomes a "declared organisation".

    An organisation can become a "declared organisation" if members of the
    police force provide a statutory declaration that they believe members
    of that organisation are engaging in criminal activities.

    Once the organisation is declared then members may not associate with
    each other, and anyone who associates with them must prove that they
    are not associating with them for "criminal reasons".

    Note the onus. Ever tried to prove a negative?

    Now anyone who so associates is going to bring anyone *they* associate
    with into the orbit of this legislation as the definition of "member"
    is pretty damn loose.

    I note that I regularly associate with a member of an organisation
    that will almost certainly be a "declared organisation" in SA, and
    when I do so I have been known to discuss illegal activities.

    (after all, lanesplitting, toll protests, helmel law protests, unlicenced
    riding, and underage drinking are all illegal and I and members of the
    NSWMCC have discussed all of the above with members of the UMC who are
    the umbrella organisation of the various patch clubs in NSW who send
    delegates to the MCC)

    Sure, the police will only target the bad guys. Who they can tell (I
    have proved by actual test) by what they wear...

    Zebee
     
    Zebee Johnstone, May 19, 2008
    #22
    1. Advertisements

  3. bikerbetty

    atec77 Guest

    This style of legislation was introduced years ago in Unzud , to the
    point whereby three or person in a public place could be ( so silly
    really) arrested or moved on as declared against the public interest
    without recourse , now who can honestly say these laws can't and wont be
    abused .Come on raise your hand ( a very succinct consideration in your
    post Z)Incidentally the unzud laws were removed but it took major public
    pressure including some huge demonstrations( my Mum egged the pm and
    many were arrested in protest) in deleting it . Considering the public
    apathy currently displayed some public review and objection is in order.
     
    atec77, May 19, 2008
    #23
  4. In aus.motorcycles on Mon, 19 May 2008 10:27:42 +1000
    heh. sounds like Section 54b of the Police Act in WA.

    I took part in the protests against that, along with the Catholic and
    Anglican Archbishops and the Chief Rabbi, all of whom took exception
    to being told they had to get written permission from the police to
    hold a wedding outdoors.

    (or, considering the very wooly definition of "public place" to
    holding a meeting for worship in a church)

    The legislation was originally for union busting to nail stop work
    meetings, but came in handy for all sorts of things.

    The SA legislation is a bit less all encompassing (be fun to have the
    Catholic Church become a "declared organisation" because of all that
    abuse coverup, but never happen) but the abuse potential is obvious,
    and the collateral damage even more obvious. It's designed to isolate
    people, designed to break up groups of friends who may have nothing
    more in common than they like to race bikes (there were patch club
    members of the racing club I used to belong to).

    Problem is that because it is less encompassing, there will be less
    opposition.

    Zebee
     
    Zebee Johnstone, May 19, 2008
    #24
  5. bikerbetty

    JL Guest

    Yet another reason to be grateful I'm not related to you.

    JL
     
    JL, May 19, 2008
    #25
  6. bikerbetty

    atec77 Guest

    Well you won't be in the will , but considering your life style presents
    little problem
    I agree whole heartedly with the old saying


    "Grow old disgracefully and become a burden to your children"

    which if they want the leaving means they have to change my bib when I
    am old and more incontinent /
     
    atec77, May 19, 2008
    #26
  7. If you think a bib is useful in dealing with an incontinent, then said
    children might be able to make case to have you put away already. :)
     
    Andrew McKenna, May 19, 2008
    #27
  8. bikerbetty

    theo Guest

    Yup, for a while there it was illegal in Perth to say g'day to more
    than one person whilst waiting for the 'green' light to come on.

    Theo
     
    theo, May 19, 2008
    #28
  9. bikerbetty

    CrazyCam Guest

    But, if you've been round to my place and had a Coopers or two, does
    that mean I'm in trouble?

    Even sillier, what about Angie?

    Presumably the chain of association only stops when it hits Labour Part
    membership.

    regards,
    CrazyCam
     
    CrazyCam, May 19, 2008
    #29
  10. bikerbetty

    atec77 Guest

    That's what the undies are for . and I get 4 days use on a trip away
     
    atec77, May 19, 2008
    #30
  11. bikerbetty

    JL Guest

    Geez you keep on giving me reasons to be grateful then don't you !
    Bibs usually go around the neck...

    JL
     
    JL, May 19, 2008
    #31
  12. bikerbetty

    Moike Guest

    You need reasons?

    Moike
     
    Moike, May 19, 2008
    #32
  13. bikerbetty

    SteveB Guest

    Just remember the other saying, "be kind to your kids, they will
    choose your nursing home"!

    SteveB
     
    SteveB, May 19, 2008
    #33
  14. bikerbetty

    atec77 Guest

    I expect to outlive them and the eventualty you suggest was allowed for ,
     
    atec77, May 19, 2008
    #34
  15. bikerbetty

    JL Guest

    Yes of course, I don't arbitrarily dislike people. Atec has of course
    given me more than enough reasons to be grateful I can choose whether or
    not to associate with him without causing any upset to anyone I care
    about (as would be the case if I were related to him - thankfully I am not)

    JL
     
    JL, May 19, 2008
    #35
  16. bikerbetty

    Knobdoodle Guest

    ??
    And?
    ??
     
    Knobdoodle, May 21, 2008
    #36
  17. bikerbetty

    theo Guest

    It's a cruisy job?

    Theo
     
    theo, May 22, 2008
    #37
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.