Bloody hell!

George Davis really *is* innocent!

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-13516591

 

Concealed evidence. What a bunch of conts.

 

He was indirectly responsible for the abandonment of a Test match, and
consequently deserves to rot in jail.

 

Is he? That's not what the judge said.

What he *did* say was ""We do not know whether Davis was guilty or not, but
his conviction cannot be said to be safe."

 

I agree with Nick.

 

Using the patented Mavis Beacon "Hunt&Peck" Technique, Beav

In which case, that is *exactly* what he said. No safe conviction:
innocent.

 

More so because it was one that England could have won in a period of
time when winning was a rarity.

 

On the other hand, he was provably a scum bag who would certainly have
committed other crimes during the time he was locked up for the one he
says he didn't commit. And he committed one soon after he came out.

**** him.

 

Champ, is that you?