BMW, on Ebay I'm interested in, any good ?

Discussion in 'UK Motorcycles' started by BORG, Oct 9, 2006.

  1. BORG

    Lozzo Guest

    SteveH says...
    They are as ugly as ****, and were back then.
     
    Lozzo, Oct 10, 2006
    #41
    1. Advertisements

  2. BORG

    Eiron Guest

    I was amused to find what I wrote about it when I was young
    and knew how to ride:

    "Specifically I didn't like the high bars, forward footpegs,
    hot air on left foot, excessive weight, engine power curve
    and crappy rear suspension."
    and
    "I once rode a K1. It was crap. Overweight, underpowered, handled like
    a pogo stick, roasted your left leg. The engine made horrible noises
    and ran out of steam just as it should have been entering a powerband.
    Oh, it was ugly too."

    Actually it sounds like my kind of bike now that I'm an old git.
     
    Eiron, Oct 10, 2006
    #42
    1. Advertisements

  3. BORG

    Tim Guest

    I don't know why you think it was slow. I got my one past 140. That was
    plenty good enough for me.
    Ok. I had mine for about 5 years (if I remember properly). During which;

    miles covered about 50,000
    breakdowns ZERO
    paint / chrome / finish decay ZERO
    back pain ZERO
    complaints from pillion ZERO
    getting luggage on it a right pain but there was a way
    heavy the wrists in slow traffic
    poor turning circle
    bit fiddly getting at the rear light bulbs as there was an electronic
    box in the way
    ABS was a bit clunky, but it worked

    and finally, no, the switch-gear layout is not a problem.
     
    Tim, Oct 10, 2006
    #43
  4. BORG

    BORG Guest

    BORG, Oct 10, 2006
    #44
  5. BORG

    Donald Guest

    Very shiney
    I've got a 1987 K75S (non ABS), it's done about 30K and isn't as shiney
    as that example, I tend to ride them and rinse them off at the start of
    the summer.

    Easy to do your own maintenance, all the parts are available from
    Motobins http://www.motobins.co.uk or Motorworks
    http://www.motorworks.co.uk.

    Normally very reliable.

    Compared to modern jap stuff it's very heavy, you need to practice
    putting it on and off the centre stand without taking out your back [1].

    Compared to modern jap stuff the brakes can seem a bit tardy.

    Compared to modern jap stuff the shafty effect can be very noticable.
    When cornering on wide sweepers over 90mph you can detect a slight
    undulation.

    Other than that for everyday use, as in winter spring summer and autumn
    it's a good bike. On normal roads you'll keep up with plastic
    fantastics. On the straight stretches they'll pull away from you.

    Don't know if the price is good or bad.

    [1] I'm putting it against CB and ER 500s
     
    Donald, Oct 10, 2006
    #45

  6. It's still about the ugliest bike anyone, anywhere, has ever built.
     
    The Older Gentleman, Oct 10, 2006
    #46
  7. The Elephant Man looked amazing.
     
    The Older Gentleman, Oct 10, 2006
    #47

  8. In all fairness, I think the 1980s/early 1990s BMWs were definitely
    better built than they are today. I'm talking Ks and airhead boxers
    here. The early four-valver bxers were, erm, not that good.
     
    The Older Gentleman, Oct 10, 2006
    #48
  9. I think the most stone-reliable bike I ever owned was my 900 Diversion,
    but Christ, was it ever dull.

    My ShiteOldBoxer - well, that doesn't count. It was dependable, and what
    went wrong on it was only due to old age (rear wheel bearings
    collapsing; red lead paint flaking off the inside of the tank and
    blocking the fuel filters).

    My old Kawa GT750 - doesn't Statto still have it? - was great. It ate a
    coil, and that was it. I'd buy another if I wanted a budget tourer. For
    my money, it was one of the best econo-tourers ever made. Shaft drive,
    comfy, reliable, range of well over 200 miles, and you could just bolt
    on the windscreens or fairings and panniers of your choice.

    I'll be interested to see how the K11 stands up. My belief is that it
    dates from before BMW started building crap bikes - certainly you see an
    amazing number of very high mileage K bikes around. I'm also expecting
    the electrics to go AWOL (well, the neutral switch already has).

    The Trophy was dead reliable. Just appallingly illogical - it cost more
    to run than the car, which is why I ditched it.

    And let's not forget the Ducati - nine years and over 27k miles up,
    looking a bit scrappy these days, but yes, reliable.
     
    The Older Gentleman, Oct 10, 2006
    #49
  10. BORG

    Lozzo Guest

    BORG says...
    That's the only sensible post I've ever seen you make.
     
    Lozzo, Oct 10, 2006
    #50
  11. BORG

    Timo Geusch Guest

    I've had one each and I'd have to agree. The early 4V boxers aren't bad
    but the Ks are better - they're probably the best engineered of the
    bunch.
     
    Timo Geusch, Oct 10, 2006
    #51
  12. BORG

    MikeH Guest

    Having had BM Ks since the 80s, I have to agree with the drop in quality.

    Luckily this drop has coincided with the decline in my memory so I have
    to say that Windows 3.1 would be my choice.
     
    MikeH, Oct 10, 2006
    #52
  13. Good stuff. But, and I know I'm on dodgy ground here, one expects that
    of a Jap bike. One doesn't expect it of a Ducati.

    Interestingly, the other thing that's held up well is the finish. All
    the paint is still excellent. The frame finish is still excellent -
    literally, no rust. The alloy's good. There are no marks on the wheels
    at all. The only real blemishes are on the black chromed parts of the
    silencers.

    This, I don't mind admitting, surprises me.

    Oh, and the dayglo marks on the speedo and tacho needles have faded to
    nothing.
     
    The Older Gentleman, Oct 10, 2006
    #53
  14. BORG

    deadmail Guest

    I don't think I've had that many problems; the current K100 I've:
    - replaced a starter clutch,
    - two coils (only one was bad, swapped the pair),
    - fuel pump wiring
    - Exhaust
    - Starter solenoid

    And er... that's all I can remember. Not so bad in about 60k miles on a
    20+ year old bike.


    Previous K100 was a snotter and hand't been properly maintained so I had
    to do the rings shortly after buying it.

    K1100 I've had to replace an exhaust gasket... that's it in 5k miles.

    K75... I've had to replace the clutch... and **** around with the tank.
    In about 60 miles. Hmm.


    All in all I don't think the *K SERIES* is that bad. Actually I think
    the old 8 valve Ks are fucking rugged bikes ideal for long distances in
    all weathers. If you like that kind of thing.


    I don't believe that a VFR owner would have had less problems than I'd
    had with the 117k mile K100... if they'd only paid 1400 quid for it when
    they bought it 3.5 years ago.


    Regarding non-K BMWs; I don't have a clue what they're like.
     
    deadmail, Oct 10, 2006
    #54
  15. BORG

    platypus Guest

    AOL for the Drifter. Although it took me 5 years because I kept crashing
    it.
     
    platypus, Oct 10, 2006
    #55
  16. BORG

    platypus Guest

    platypus, Oct 10, 2006
    #56
  17. BORG

    BORG Guest

    BORG, Oct 10, 2006
    #57
  18. BORG

    Pip Guest

    Yebbut the semi-sighted daft Welsh fucker could have added that it
    would look a lot better 'fightered and pain^H^H^H^Hsplattered in matt
    black.

    Even better crushed and cubed.
     
    Pip, Oct 11, 2006
    #58
  19. BORG

    Pip Guest

    Haha or peculiar?
     
    Pip, Oct 11, 2006
    #59
  20. BORG

    Lozzo Guest

    Pip says...
    Poor fucker's lost his gorm.
    Agreed.
     
    Lozzo, Oct 11, 2006
    #60
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.