Boing

Discussion in 'Australian Motorcycles' started by IK, Apr 26, 2005.

  1. IK

    IK Guest

    Been a while since I've come close to taking my eye out, so...

    ....anyone got any reccommendations for a spring compressor?

    The Ohlins I had earmarked for the ZX-9R has turned out to have a
    soft-as-all-buggery spring in it (static sag of ~20mm and just resting
    my weight on the grabrails comes to within 10mm of bottoming out), so I
    need a stiffer one, and I might as well replace it myself.
     
    IK, Apr 26, 2005
    #1
    1. Advertisements

  2. Let us know when you get one - I might need to borrow it, the 748 shock
    I got from eBay just showed up, now its time to see whether all the
    poeple who said it _will_ fit the Monster are right, or whether all the
    people who said it _won't_ fit are correct - the entire world seemed to
    be a pretty even 50/50 split when I started asking around before
    bidding...

    big
     
    Iain Chalmers, Apr 26, 2005
    #2
    1. Advertisements

  3. IK

    John Littler Guest

    Anything will fit, it just come down to how determined you are, and how
    good a machining shop you have access to....

    JL
    (I'm guessing that didn't help ?)
     
    John Littler, Apr 26, 2005
    #3
  4. IK

    Jules Guest

    Just lose some weight you fat bastard.

    Glad I could help.

    Jules
     
    Jules, Apr 26, 2005
    #4
  5. IK

    Glen Guest

    From the Ohlins website

    monster 750




    Öhlins shock absorber

    Part No. DU 440

    Type 46HRC

    Length 330 mm

    Stroke 65 mm



    . Type 46HRC with hose mounted reservoir, easy to fit where it
    is easy to reach.
    . Fully adjustable, compression and rebound adjustments.
    . Fits bikes where there is no room for a "piggy back"
    reservoir.

    Learn more about 46HRC

    The pictures are only representative for the shock absorber type
    and may differ in apperance from the shock absorbers specified for your
    vehicle.


    748

    Öhlins shock absorber

    Part No. DU 143

    Type 46PRXB

    Length 305 mm

    Stroke 71 mm



    . Super effective adjustable high and low speed compression
    damping.
    . Unique hydraulic spring adjuster, with integrated adjuster,
    makes adjustments quick and easy.
    . Easy adjustable rebound.
    . Internal temperature compensation for the damping.
    . "Piggyback" type gives improved cooling with more consistent
    damping and longer damper life.

    Learn more about 46PRXB

    The pictures are only representative for the shock absorber type
    and may differ in apperance from the shock absorbers specified for your
    vehicle.
     
    Glen, Apr 27, 2005
    #5
  6. IK

    John Littler Guest

    25mm is a fairly significant decrease in ride height on a bike that's
    already on the slower side of the sports bike world - would be looking
    at longer dog legs or mount points to stretch it up again

    JL
    (it's not like you need a lower seat height)
     
    John Littler, Apr 27, 2005
    #6
  7. Thanks Glen, I didn't think of looking there...
    Heh - so I'll have a Monster Chopper!

    The old Monsters (like mine) have a fair bit of ride height adjustment
    where the rear suspension "hoop" attaches to the swingarm via screw
    threaded rose joints. The problem is more likely to be that the linkage
    geometry means a 25mm shorter shock actually translates to somewhat more
    that 25mm less ride height... The specs for my Monster say 65mm of shock
    travel and 144mm of wheel travel, so that implies I'm looking at 55mm
    less ride height (which is probably within the limits of adjustment
    available), but with 6 mm more travel, I may actually end up wanting
    closer to 69mm of extra ride height to make sure the wheel doesn't top
    out against the bottom of the seat - thats definitely going to be right
    at the far end of the adjustment if it works at all...

    The other problem is that the 748 shock had an integrated reservoir
    hanging off the side which the Monster shock doesn't have - it might not
    fit around the shock linkage compnents and exhaust...

    Still, I got the shock cheap off eBay, if it doesn't fit easily, I'm
    pretty sure I can offload it again without losing much on the deal...

    big (so if I show up on Sunday morning on the Spada...)
     
    Iain Chalmers, Apr 28, 2005
    #7
  8. IK

    Glen Guest

    on the VFR400 the shock length to ride height ratio is 3:1

    every 1mm of shock length equates to 3 mm ride height due to the linkage
    ratios

    but in the end depending on the fittings you might be able to rig up a
    spacer
    to take up the extra and of course add a little bit more ide height for a
    quicker turn in
     
    Glen, Apr 28, 2005
    #8
  9. IK

    John Littler Guest

    Agreed, as per J5's post, there's a ratio which can be anywhere from
    less than 1:1 to 3 or 4:1. However...
    No it doesn't... does it ? Shock *travel* isn't a function of ride
    height (ie you cant assume a one to one relationship). Shock travel and
    wheel travel are obviously related, but the correlation with ride height
    is with shock length, no ?

    Ie your ride height change will be some multiple of 25mm (depending on
    what the linkage ratio is), the change in wheel travel will be the
    linkage ratio times the change in shock travel, no ?

    So worst/best case scenario I doubt your wheel travel increase will be
    more than 4x6mm = 24mm (i've not heard of ratios much above 1:4 but I've
    obviously only a limited range of experience)
    The logic here is sound - the additional travel is going to require
    additional ride height, however a doubt you'll need to go plus 69mm ride
    height plus 50mm should be enough.

    But note, this is all theory - I've never played with a Monster's
    suspension and I'm open to someone pointing out a logic fault.
    Sounds like a plan :)
    I'll be quite understanding :)

    JL
    (and don't think I'll even try to keep up with you on the Raptor if
    you're on the Spada, I care way too much about not crashing at the
    moment to try and stay in sight of you on that thing)
     
    John Littler, Apr 28, 2005
    #9
  10. IK

    John Littler Guest

    Glen wrote:

    Number 5 isn't alive ?

    JL
    No more J5 ?
     
    John Littler, Apr 28, 2005
    #10
  11. Or, just to complicate things, a variable "rising-rate" (yeah, its an
    odd looking linkage setup)...
    Ummm - I probably didn't explain that well enough, I guestimated the
    linkage ratio from the specced shocktravel/wheeltravel numbers (about
    2.2:1), then used that ratio on the 25mm shock length difference. The
    comes out at about 55mm less ride height, with 14mm more travel (not
    allowing for the rising rate linkage).
    worst case, the 748 shock will be 31mm shorter overall when fully
    compressed than the monster shock, which (ignoring the rising rate)
    could mean the wheel would end up 69mm closer to the seat/subframe.
    Having thought it through further, I expect the rising rate thing will
    actually allow the 748 shock to work with the available ride height
    adjustment... Which is cool :)
    Yeah, I haven't either - yet :)
    Actually, I've just noticed the MotoGP telecast starts at 1:30pm (on
    Fox) - looks like I won't be joining you...

    big
     
    Iain Chalmers, Apr 28, 2005
    #11
  12. IK

    John Littler Guest

    Hmmmph ! didn't anyone tell you about video recorders ? Piker !

    JL
     
    John Littler, Apr 28, 2005
    #12
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.
Similar Threads
Loading...