Buy you new bikes now then!

Discussion in 'UK Motorcycles' started by Hog, Jun 22, 2010.

  1. Hog

    Hog Guest

    VAT and all that.

    Pretty good budget but 20% will smart a bit. Hey Ho.
    Shame about the huge cop out on child benefit, not cutting it out for all
    but the low paid that is.

    I expected that a flat tax system was too much to get in this early on.
     
    Hog, Jun 22, 2010
    #1
    1. Advertisements

  2. Hog

    ginge Guest

    Indeed, looks like I now need to get Bikes, Consumer Electronics,
    Building work, and some other stuff all sorted out this year.

    No more procrastinating.
     
    ginge, Jun 22, 2010
    #2
    1. Advertisements

  3. Hog

    Hog Guest

    ****. Building work. **** yes.

    6 months should be enough.

    Lets hope they deal with the Lothian Question soon also.
     
    Hog, Jun 22, 2010
    #3
  4. No it won't - you'll barely notice it.
     
    doetnietcomputeren, Jun 22, 2010
    #4
  5. Hog

    Adrian Guest

    Quite. £2.12 on every £100 pre-increase total bill.
     
    Adrian, Jun 22, 2010
    #5
  6. Hog

    Krusty Guest

    Only if you buy stuff.
     
    Krusty, Jun 22, 2010
    #6
  7. Hog

    Hog Guest

    One is alive therefor
     
    Hog, Jun 22, 2010
    #7
  8. Hog

    Krusty Guest

    One has a motorbike & a passport - everything else is irrelevant.
     
    Krusty, Jun 22, 2010
    #8
  9. Hog

    crn Guest

    This one has been discussed to death for many years. The extra cost
    of administering a means tested version of child benefit would be
    more than the money it could save.
    Dont expect to see any progress until nu-nu-labour get in and start
    looking for ways to create more wasteful public sector jobs for
    the boys.
     
    crn, Jun 22, 2010
    #9
  10. Hog

    Adrian Guest

    gurgled happily, sounding much like they were
    saying:
    How's it claimed at the moment? It should be relatively simple to do an
    additional check to see if the claimant is a higher-rate tax payer.
     
    Adrian, Jun 22, 2010
    #10
  11. Hog

    Hog Guest

    I could think up an easy to operate system in a jiffy.
    Hold on.
    Yep, got it.

    Don't compensate anyone to Sprog.
    For those actually claiming benefits make an allowance to feed & cloth
    sprogs part of the process. They already have to account for their
    circumstances.
     
    Hog, Jun 22, 2010
    #11
  12. Hog

    SteveH Guest

    Who made you the 'voice of reason'?
     
    SteveH, Jun 22, 2010
    #12
  13. Hog

    Hog Guest

    <hangs head in shame>

    I keep hearing that an aging population is a crisis and we need a higher
    birthrate and immigration. What utter not_thought_through bollocks. People
    are going to be working much later into their life so we need employers to
    restructure their practices such that people in their 50-60-70's are
    substantially employed doing most things and younger people substantially do
    what is more difficult for people who are much older.

    For instance when I walk into a bank the Tellers would reasonably be people
    around what is currently thought of as retirement age. Most people that age
    are sharp as pins. Same goes for call and customer service centers. ATM I
    find people in their 20-40's involved.

    The last thing we need is a larger population. Here or anywhere else.
     
    Hog, Jun 22, 2010
    #13
  14. Hog

    CT Guest

    Who made you the 'voice of reason'?
     
    CT, Jun 22, 2010
    #14
  15. Hog

    Hog Guest

    I don't have a Tanto to hand
     
    Hog, Jun 22, 2010
    #15
  16. Hog

    Ben Guest

    I claim child benefit. I also earn quite a bit of money.

    I also pay fuckloads of tax and national insurance a month.

    So I view the national insurance as a savings account that I can get a
    bit of it back every once in a while. I also claim tax credits, and
    everything else I can. I figure I've put plenty into the system, I
    should be able to get some of it back.

    And frankly, it's pretty much impossible not to claim child benefit.
     
    Ben, Jun 22, 2010
    #16
  17. Hog

    Andy Bonwick Guest

    I totally agree with you but Hog has obviously made sure that his ex
    has never claimed a penny for their son because that would mark him
    down as some kind of a hypocrite.
     
    Andy Bonwick, Jun 22, 2010
    #17
  18. Hog

    Hog Guest

    Lets go back to an original premise. Paying tax then claiming it back in
    benefits is hugely inefficient and sustains an army of civil servants.
    Paying less tax and not having to **** around with State handouts makes more
    sense, no?
     
    Hog, Jun 22, 2010
    #18
  19. Hog

    Hog Guest

    WTF my ex wife has got to do with an effective tax policy is anyones guess
    but you go right on speculating.
     
    Hog, Jun 22, 2010
    #19
  20. Hog

    greybeard Guest

    Wrong!
    I don't claim, can't claim and prolly never will be able to.
    I don't get tax credits or any help for that matter. And I pay shit loads of
    tax and NI.
    I've got no kids so get penalised on all fronts and _can't_ claim Child
    benefit!
    I do however, seem to be paying for a lot of other peoples' little bastards
    to enjoy a good education though.
    I think it's about time the poor unfortunate people that don't have kids got
    a look in on the benefit system a tad.

    IIRC Child benefit or whatever you want to call it was originally brought in
    after the war to encourage re-population. I don't think it has any place in
    this modern society and people should be encouraged to have smaller
    families.

    Just my 2d worth :)
     
    greybeard, Jun 22, 2010
    #20
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.