Chaytor jailed for 18 months

Discussion in 'UK Motorcycles' started by stephen.packer, Jan 7, 2011.

  1. stephen.packer

    Colin Irvine Guest

    Quite.
     
    Colin Irvine, Jan 8, 2011
    #21
    1. Advertisements

  2. It's as a deterrent to others.

    Now, if we were talking about a shop-lifting mother, a fee dodging
    student, a benefits claimant caught working etc. I'd have sympathy.

    But, remember this is a guy was part of the government who were going to
    be "purer than pure". Sorry, he and anyone else found guilty must
    suffer the full consequences of their actions under the legislature that
    they were in part responsible for.
     
    stephen.packer, Jan 8, 2011
    #22
    1. Advertisements

  3. stephen.packer

    Pete Fisher Guest

    I concur.

    --
    +-------------------------------------------------------------------+
    | Pete Fisher at Home: |
    | Aprilia Shiver Yamaha WR250Z/Supermoto "Old Gimmer's Hillclimber" |
    | Gilera GFR * 2 Moto Morini 2C/375 Morini 350 "Forgotten Error" |
    +-------------------------------------------------------------------+
     
    Pete Fisher, Jan 8, 2011
    #23
  4. Yes and the Italians keep Silvio Burlesconi in power! I think other
    places have bigger problems than we do.
    The public's weariness with politicians goes back much further than the
    "expenses scandal". It just gave the public another opportunity to feel
    even more disillusioned with the political process. The politicians
    don't seem to have a clue what to do to get engagement back on the
    agenda. I rather doubt the media have much interest in having effective
    politicians. I think they prefer to have them "under their thumb" so to
    speak.
    Despicable? That's stretching it somewhat. In effect he nicked some
    cash he wasn't entitled to. That is clearly wrong and unacceptable but
    despicable?
    For some reason I can't get very worked up about all this. I couldn't
    get worked up about the whole "expenses" issue other than to find the
    antics of the press rather unsavoury but we can hardly be surprised by
    that. I just wonder what the News of the Screws has got on senior
    members of the Met Police given their repeated reluctance to properly
    investigate the (possible) phone tapping issue at that newspaper.
    What's an expenses claim? Can't remember the last time I incurred an
    expense on LU business that could be claimed back.
    Having seen a short "vox pop" clip on the BBC news I rather suspect the
    general public would not agree with this. The views being expressed
    bordered on wanting Mr Chaytor sent to the gas chambers. You'd think
    he'd murdered babies and then eaten them for dinner.
     
    Paul Corfield, Jan 8, 2011
    #24
  5. I agree. But that's not the point.


    Claiming parlimentary privillege.
    I was disgusted at the sense of entitlement that they had.

    And regarding the phone issue... it's not phone tapping! It's simply
    accessing voicemail since many people use obvious pin codes or stick
    wiht the default.


    <snip>
     
    stephen.packer, Jan 8, 2011
    #25
  6. stephen.packer

    Krusty Guest

    Sure, but I don't see why being on a curfew, tagged, & having to spend
    all day cleaning up grafitti or painting pensioner's houses or some
    other shitty job would be any less of a deterrent than several months
    in a 'soft' prison.
    Anyone who believed that should probably be jailed for extreme
    gullibility.
     
    Krusty, Jan 8, 2011
    #26
  7. stephen.packer

    des Guest

    It's not, actually. Numerous studies have failed to find a single instance
    of where the death penalty deterred murder. Eighteen months in the pokey
    (which I personally find to be an abhorrently harsh sentence for someone
    who stole money) is not going to deter anyone - especially as
    statistically, there is still very little chance of being caught.
     
    des, Jan 8, 2011
    #27
  8. stephen.packer

    Pete Fisher Guest

    You can get banged up, in theory, for certain offences in the
    Environmental Protection Act 1990. I used to find reminding people about
    that possibility quite effective in persuading them to modify their
    behaviour.


    Purer than pure is going a bit far, but if MPs don't set an example who
    will - the Church? Oh hang on...


    --
    +-------------------------------------------------------------------+
    | Pete Fisher at Home: |
    | Aprilia Shiver Yamaha WR250Z/Supermoto "Old Gimmer's Hillclimber" |
    | Gilera GFR * 2 Moto Morini 2C/375 Morini 350 "Forgotten Error" |
    +-------------------------------------------------------------------+
     
    Pete Fisher, Jan 8, 2011
    #28
  9. stephen.packer

    Krusty Guest

    Nobody, as long as money and/or power are involved.
    Heh.
     
    Krusty, Jan 8, 2011
    #29
  10. stephen.packer

    A.Lee Guest

    And yet only this week, there was a programme on TV about various sites
    in London, one, Burligton Arcade had its own Police Force, Beadles, who
    are still employed there today as Security staff.
    One of the local bye-law/rules was that there can be no whistling in the
    arcade.
    This was attributed to an upsurge in pickpockets in the 1820's (the
    pickpockets worked in multiple, and would make whistles to each other as
    warnings, or potential victims). The upsurge in pick-pocketing was
    because the death penalty for this Offence had recently been repealed.

    Alan.
     
    A.Lee, Jan 8, 2011
    #30
  11. stephen.packer

    SIRPip Guest

    This puts me in mind of Ben Elton and the non-absorbent bogroll: "And
    if you keep on going, you end up with a fresh jobby on top of your
    head!"
     
    SIRPip, Jan 8, 2011
    #31
  12. stephen.packer

    ogden Guest

    Prison as an intangible is no deterrent.

    Prison staring you in the face almost certainly makes you think twice.
    For a while.
     
    ogden, Jan 8, 2011
    #32
  13. Sure, it's a Blair quote from I think 97...
     
    stephen.packer, Jan 8, 2011
    #33
  14. stephen.packer

    des Guest

    No it was not, and you do not possess any evidence that it was.
     
    des, Jan 8, 2011
    #34
  15. stephen.packer

    Pete Fisher Guest

    Making them think enough times and for long enough not to have to ever
    actually write up a prosecution report was good enough for me.

    There were always the odd hard man and the certifiable that it didn't
    work with. These MPs might fall in to either, or indeed both camps.

    --
    +-------------------------------------------------------------------+
    | Pete Fisher at Home: |
    | Aprilia Shiver Yamaha WR250Z/Supermoto "Old Gimmer's Hillclimber" |
    | Gilera GFR * 2 Moto Morini 2C/375 Morini 350 "Forgotten Error" |
    +-------------------------------------------------------------------+
     
    Pete Fisher, Jan 8, 2011
    #35
  16. If the studies are after proof that deterrence is taking place then they
    are badly formed studies and should be ignore. If on the other hand they
    are studying whether murder rates go up, down or even both then they are
    valid.

    And of course we are talking about studies that study the criminal and or
    the criminally insane and the chances of getting meaningful answers from
    them are remote at best.

    I think the threat of a death penalty neither increases nor decreases the
    chances that society as a whole will go on a casual murdering spree but
    may affect individuals within that society in both a positive and negative
    manner. How many, for example, merkin murderers do it as a form of
    attempted suicide? We will never know and all the so called precious
    scientific studies in the world mean their opinions are about as worthy as
    mine and mine are a **** sight cheaper.
     
    steve auvache, Jan 8, 2011
    #36
  17. Leave it. For one thing this isn't about death penalties and for
    another, the FFW[1] is simply trolling. Leave this shit to aadp.

    [1] Faux Front Wheel
     
    The Older Gentleman, Jan 8, 2011
    #37
  18. stephen.packer

    des Guest

    You _stupid_ ****...
     
    des, Jan 8, 2011
    #38
  19. stephen.packer

    des Guest

    The latter defines the former.

    There is no evidence that the murder rate goes up or down. Indeed, there
    are even studies which indicate that the murder rate goes up after an
    execution and that the death penalty is conceivably causing this rise (the
    so-called 'brutalization effect'). These are statistically questionable,
    however, as well as methodologically flawed.

    On the other hand, there are more credible studies which demonstrate that
    the murder rates in Canada and Australia dropped when those countries
    abolished capital punishment in 1976 and 1985 respectively.
    No. The studies done so far have paid very little attention to the
    motivations of the individual prisoner, because it is by and large
    irrelevant.
    There is no evidence to support your hypothesis.
    I should imagine very few, as the death penalty in the US is 'hampered' (if
    you'll pardon the unfortunate choice of words) by the protections enshrined
    in the VIII and XIV Amendments. As such, even in Texas, the time between
    conviction and execution is still (last time I looked) of the order of nine
    to thirteen years.

    A much more efficient way to off yourself if you don't have the balls to do
    it is 'suicide by cop'. But of course, those people never enter the
    criminal justice system (at least not on 'that' occasion).
    We don't have to 'know': no credible study has ever found any benefit of
    the death penalty which cannot adequetely be gained using other, non-lethal
    means (other than 'saving pro-death penalty people money on Viagra'), logic
    and morals demand that it not be imposed.
    Quite.

    --
    des
    'The same folks that are bombing innocent people in Iraq were
    the ones who attacked America on September the 11th'
    (George W. Bush (1946 - ))
    <http://elderofziyon.blogspot.com/>
     
    des, Jan 8, 2011
    #39
  20. stephen.packer

    Beav Guest

    It'll just about show the great unwashed that thieving off the state is "Not
    A Good Thing".
    But you're taking jobs off the menial taskers who need the money and even
    have pride in their work of bum-wiping / painting / tidying up.
     
    Beav, Jan 8, 2011
    #40
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.