Compact digital cameraisti - Canon G10 or Nikon P6000?

Discussion in 'UK Motorcycles' started by Simon Wilson, May 31, 2009.

  1. Simon Wilson

    Simon Wilson Guest

    Anyone got either of the above? Pleased with it? If they are a similar
    price then in reviews the Canon seems to score higher, but Jessops are
    selling the P6000 quite a lot cheaper now.
     
    Simon Wilson, May 31, 2009
    #1
    1. Advertisements

  2. Simon Wilson

    ogden Guest

    I don't understand cameras like that.

    If you want something that works like an SLR, why not buy an SLR? Or do
    they offer something that an SLR doesn't?
     
    ogden, May 31, 2009
    #2
    1. Advertisements

  3. Simon Wilson

    Simon Wilson Guest

    Much smaller, but nicer to handle than the tiny ones. Still good quality
    and full control over all the settings.
     
    Simon Wilson, May 31, 2009
    #3
  4. Simon Wilson

    AndrewR Guest

    I bought myself a Fuji S8000 a couple of months ago and it's been great -
    more than enough settings to fiddle with for a complete amateur like myself.

    --
    AndrewR, D.Bot (Celeritas)
    Aprilia RSV-1000R, Honda VFR750F-L
    BOTAFOT#2,ITJWTFO#6,UKRMRM#1/13a,MCT#1,DFV#2,SKoGA#0 (and KotL)
    BotToS#5,SBS#25,IbW#34, DS#5, COSOC# Suspended, KotTFSTR#
    The speccy Geordie twat.
     
    AndrewR, May 31, 2009
    #4
  5. Simon Wilson

    ginge Guest

    But a bridge isn't all that small. better to just carry a really good
    compact.
     
    ginge, Jun 1, 2009
    #5
  6. Simon Wilson

    Fr Jack Guest

    Such as?
     
    Fr Jack, Jun 1, 2009
    #6
  7. Simon Wilson

    Switters Guest

    <mode="recommend what you own">
    I'm quite impressed with the Panasonic Lumix TZ4 that I have and it's
    miles better than the Sony that I had before it - although to be fair,
    there's 2 years of extra development between them.
    </mode>
     
    Switters, Jun 1, 2009
    #7
  8. Simon Wilson

    ginge Guest

    Take your pick from panasonic something or others / canon
    ixusususususes / nikon thingummies.. they're all much of a muchness.
    Sure you'll lose out on lens options but nowadays many of them have
    image stabilisation, they all fit in a trouser or jacket pocket so are
    ideal for catching unexpected moments on the off-chance.
     
    ginge, Jun 1, 2009
    #8
  9. Simon Wilson

    ogden Guest

    I've just ordered an Ixus 100 to take on holiday, rather than lug the
    DSLR around when I'm hooning up a mountain.

    I'm expecting it to be a slightly snazzier version of the D80/D95, in
    which case it should be absolutely fine. The Panasonic equivalent
    actually looks like a better bet, with 5x optical zoom, but it doesn't
    look as swanky.
     
    ogden, Jun 1, 2009
    #9
  10. Simon Wilson

    CT Guest

    It hasn't even got 5x optical?! How...err...quaint.

    <fx:pats 10x optical TZ5>
     
    CT, Jun 1, 2009
    #10
  11. Simon Wilson

    ginge Guest

    They look decent. I've been happy enough with my more basic ixus 70
    over the past couple of years.
     
    ginge, Jun 1, 2009
    #11
  12. Simon Wilson

    ogden Guest

    With 12MP there's plenty of scope for cropping later.
     
    ogden, Jun 1, 2009
    #12
  13. Simon Wilson

    ogden Guest

    Sure, but it's only really a major issue if you want to retain the
    original image size. Which for something as huge as a 12MP image would
    only be a problem if I wanted to print out an A3 copy or somthing. Which
    would be, like, so 90s.

    If I was worried about perfect images I'd take my DSLR, not a compact.
     
    ogden, Jun 1, 2009
    #13
  14. Simon Wilson

    ginge Guest

    that's not my interpretation of Bridge, which pretty much matches this
    one

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bridge_digital_camera

    Fixed lens, and a feature set like an SLR.

    I'd actually class the G10 as a large compact, and the ixus as a small
    compact.
     
    ginge, Jun 1, 2009
    #14
  15. Simon Wilson

    Maurice Guest

    I've got the Nikon P5100 which seems to have laregly similar specs to
    the P6000. I've been very pleased with it and it is small enough to
    carry around most of the time which is what I do with mine. I've been
    thinking about upgrading to the P6000 for the GPS and RAW formats.
     
    Maurice, Jun 1, 2009
    #15
  16. My composition is pretty decent, and I pan and zoom pretty well for
    action stuff. But when I want to **** with aperture settings or
    whatever, it takes me so long to think through what I need to get what
    I want...that the moment has gone.
     
    vulgarandmischevious, Jun 2, 2009
    #16
  17. Simon Wilson

    Simes Guest

    That's a common complaint - and really it's because the camera auto
    settings are good enough 90% of the time that you don't use the manual
    settings often enough to get familiar with them.

    If you used the manual settings more, they'd become second nature and
    take no time to set up. Whether you need to force yourself down this
    learning curve is a question only you can answer - it all depends on how
    many shots are sub-optimal (in your own opinion as you are the primary
    audience of your own photographs) as to whether it's worthwhile.
     
    Simes, Jun 2, 2009
    #17
  18. Simon Wilson

    Champ Guest

    As Simes says, that's just a question of practice. If use the manual
    settings regularly, it'll become second nature.
     
    Champ, Jun 2, 2009
    #18
  19. Simon Wilson

    Ace Guest

    You still got a blind spot for that, eh? Best thing would be for you
    to use the ap+- button to pick one setting that's good for
    depth-of-field (narrow aperture, slow speed) and another that's good
    for sharp precise images (wide aperture, fast shutter speed, so also
    better for action shots) and save these as P1 and P2 program modes.
    Then all you have to do is remember P1=deep, P2=fast and select the
    required one for each shot.
     
    Ace, Jun 2, 2009
    #19
  20. Simon Wilson

    Switters Guest

    Without knowing which camera he has, but most people in those situations
    would be better off using the "sports" and "landscape" modes, which will
    usually adjust focusing, metering, ISO as well.
     
    Switters, Jun 2, 2009
    #20
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.