dilemna

Discussion in 'Classic Motorcycles' started by R Strong, Aug 15, 2003.

  1. R Strong

    R Strong Guest

    My "commute", taken at various times of day and night, is between two
    locations joined by 14 miles of country road, fast dual carriageway,
    and rough track. Steep gradients and loose surfaces figure in the
    latter. The warm weather has brought out a latent desire for biking
    it. I don't have a working MC just now, if you exclude the Quickly. At
    some little expense, I could a) revive the CD175 b) acquire a "trials"
    Bantam c) ditto a small MZ. Any comments? OK, any helpful comments?
    R
     
    R Strong, Aug 15, 2003
    #1
    1. Advertisements

  2. R Strong

    S Guest

    Acquire a Yamaha XT350 or similar?. Ace bike, good road manners too.

    MZ probably the best of the ones listed[1] as dual carriageway work on a
    bantam may not be good for either its or your longevity. The CD would be
    'interesting' off road.

    HTH, even if only a little bit.

    [1]I do have something of a soft spot for MZs
     
    S, Aug 15, 2003
    #2
    1. Advertisements

  3. R Strong

    WorkTOG Guest

    CD175 has such shocking suspension and ground clearance it might not
    like unmade tracks. I'd go for the MZ - I chased hot air balloons
    across country on one (a Saxon Tour 250) once, and was startled at
    just how well it coped with rough unmade and dirt roads.

    And then I considered those were the sort of Commie roads it was
    originally designed for.
     
    WorkTOG, Aug 15, 2003
    #3
  4. R Strong

    JB Guest

    More lame than a very lame thing at a meeting of gelded cripples. Vastly
    overpriced too.
    A cheap old TS185/250 or XL185 would do.
    The CD would be excellent for this. You can put both feet down easy enough
    too!

    JB
     
    JB, Aug 15, 2003
    #4
  5. R Strong

    S Guest


    Conceded. IMHO the XT350 ( full power, not neutered ) is an ace bike. I
    often get called a wierdo though.

    Love your description of it, quite made me chuckle that did. The TS250 is
    an order of magnitude more fun both on and off road.

    There was a chap on here who got really lucky on a DT175MX. I'm sure I read
    he was contemplating selling it. That'd be perfect.



    Yebbut the CD needs that coz it gets stuck on large bits of gravel.
     
    S, Aug 15, 2003
    #5
  6. R Strong

    S Guest

    <snip guff>

    Eeek!, I've just realised how disjointed my reply was. I do humbly
    apologise for once again being a donk.
     
    S, Aug 15, 2003
    #6
  7. R Strong

    Sean Guest

    Yup, 125s too. ISTR they were called Pathfinders. An MZ with the header pipe
    rotated through about 165deg, a shorter rod to hold the silencer on, 18"
    wheels and a high rise front mudguard. Not much better off road than a
    stock MZ, but then a stock MZ with cheapo knobbly tyres is a real hoot off
    road until the rigid foot rest or the supergun silencer wedge on the side
    of a rut, then rut surfing becomes your new past time.

    MZs are ace, and I'll disagree with anyone who says different. Not strongly
    disagree, or throw a paddy, just disagree.
     
    Sean, Aug 20, 2003
    #7
  8. MZ also made a fairly serious enduro bike in the late 1970s/early 1980s.
    It had a double monoshock rear - that is, a cantilever rear end, but
    two, not one, shocks sitting side by side , controlling it. Quite a
    tool. They never put it into volume production, the fools. Special order
    for competition riders only.

    I've always liked them, too, for their pure honesty.
     
    The Older Gentleman, Aug 20, 2003
    #8
  9. R Strong

    sweller Guest


    Some pictures of their competition machines in action (in the GDR) from a
    1983 event (I think the ISDE).
    http://www.sweller.co.uk/isde-83/
     
    sweller, Aug 20, 2003
    #9
  10. Yes, that's *exactly* the model I was thinking of. The top pic. Look
    very closely and you can see the second shock, in parallel with the
    first.

    I remember asking Wilf Green why the *hell* MZ didn't put it into volume
    production, because they'd have sold every single one. It seems that
    production of road machinery was ordained by the Commie Plan, so that
    was what they had to build.

    Look at that top pic again - you can see the TS/ETZ ancestry in the
    engine, and it's even got the superb enclosed chain. It looks amazingly
    modern and businesslike, even now.
     
    The Older Gentleman, Aug 20, 2003
    #10
  11. R Strong

    Timo Geusch Guest

    The Older Gentleman was seen penning the following ode to ... whatever:
    Everything I read about JAWA/CZ/MZ suggests that all the 'real'
    development work happened after management had buggered off to get
    drunk. As you said, sticking to the plan was more important than
    producing something that would sell in the West, simply because they
    never produced enough to satisfy demand anyway. What we in the "West"
    regarded as bikes for cheapskates (MZs were sold in Germany by
    Neckermann[1] at one point, and the only people buying them were those
    who either wanted a cheap outfit or students who couldn't afford a
    'better' bike), they were the only mode of transport for a lot of
    people in the GDR.

    Plus of course, CZ was the manufacturer of choice for off-road
    competition machines in the Comecon area (and Pannonia in Hungary
    AFAIR).

    [1] Big mail-order company in Germany, selling everything from mopeds
    to clothes to holidays. Bit like Sears in the States, just a lot
    smaller.
     
    Timo Geusch, Aug 20, 2003
    #11
  12. R Strong

    Timo Geusch Guest

    The Older Gentleman was seen penning the following ode to ... whatever:
    IMHO it was the 'Commie bike' that was at least part of the problem -
    basically everything that was imported from the GDR was being look
    down on as cheap and nasty, no matter how good it was. Praktica
    cameras are another example. They were incredible VFM but were
    obviously 'no good'.
    And interestingly enough, in the classic car & bike press (they're one
    and the same in Germany, most of the magazines for 'poor people' like
    us are running bike & car articles side by side) they're beginning to
    appreciate MZs for exactly this reason. That, and the fact that
    they're easy to work on so they make superb beginner's classic bikes.
    Can't comment on that, but a quick trawl of a German mag suggests that
    most spares suppliers reside in the East. I think spares supply and
    servicing were a sore point back in the 70s/80s but I wasn't
    interested in bikes back then.
     
    Timo Geusch, Aug 21, 2003
    #12
  13. R Strong

    sweller Guest


    I suspect Wilf Green was seen as too connected with the 'old Stalinist'
    MZ (I'm not suggesting WG was a Stalinist) by the new private MuZ and
    they dropped him. Unfortunately they dropped his excellent network and
    UK market expertise, as TOG described.

    In 1995 (IIRC) he had a massive sale at his warehouses everything at real
    giveaway prices, engines at pennies, ISDT machines and parts, dealer
    service tools etc. Died not long after.

    Five or six years ago I met a chap who had an old bike shop in Brighton
    (Rottingdean Bikes), long since closed. He had a garage *full* of new
    and some used MZ spares, mainly 6v vintage.

    IIRC, 2 or 3 SAAB 900 car loads later and a very full shed I was the
    proud owner of all his NOS.

    I sold it through the MZRC, pricing was based on his old 1983 trade price
    books which were stupidly cheap. £2-£3 for armature windings, full ES
    Trophy toolkits £5, Trophy indicators £2, TS 250/1 pistons £3 etc. etc.

    I've still got boxes of Venhill cables for ES, TS, TS/1, and ETZ.
     
    sweller, Aug 21, 2003
    #13
  14. R Strong

    Andy Clews Guest

    Thus spake The Older Gentleman unto the assembled multitudes:
    My affection for MZ's was tested for a little while back in the 70's when a
    mate of mine with a TS250 and who had dropped it, kept asking me to help
    him realign the wheels because the frame was slightly bent. This
    consisted of me sitting on the bike holding the bars straight while he
    fiddled around with a spanner at the back wheel trying to find the best
    alignment to suit the bent frame. This procedure, oft repeated, generally
    took place in pub car parks on cold winter evenings and delayed my getting
    my laughing gear around my nightly 3 pints of Young's Winter Warmer.

    He never did manage to get the wheel alignment quite right, so sold the
    bike and bought another new one which he managed to avoid dropping and
    bending.

    Apart from the apparently vulnerable frames ;-) they seemed like nice solid
    (and honest as TOG says) bikes. Rrrrinnnnggg-dinggg-dngg-dng-dng!
     
    Andy Clews, Aug 21, 2003
    #14
  15. R Strong

    R Strong Guest

    On Wed, 20 Aug 2003 20:18:27 +0100, Timo Geusch

    .......
    ....but we don't encounter much enthusiasm for the CZ marque? Another
    forgotten jewel, or are they really sh*te?
    R
     
    R Strong, Aug 21, 2003
    #15
  16. Shite. Decent enduro bikes, though.
     
    The Older Gentleman, Aug 21, 2003
    #16
  17. R Strong

    Timo Geusch Guest

    R Strong was seen penning the following ode to ... whatever:
    I *think* their off-road bikes were pretty good. The roadbikes
    probably weren't.
     
    Timo Geusch, Aug 21, 2003
    #17
  18. R Strong

    sweller Guest


    I've worked on them. I can think of no redeeming features. Not even
    being cheap.
     
    sweller, Aug 21, 2003
    #18
  19. I don't have a working MC just now, if you exclude the Quickly.

    Why not the Quickly?

    I do 20 miles a day on an old Raleigh Runabout. Great fun with £37 for
    insurance, about £3 a week to run and free TAX. I've tuned it a little to
    ease the stress and i'll really happy with the results.

    Great if you like a lot of fiddling to keep you bike going.

    Steve.
     
    Steve Simpson, Aug 21, 2003
    #19
  20. They made good offroad/competition things, but the road bikes were
    pretty crap.


    --

    Dave

    GS 850 x2 / SE 6a
    SbS#6? DIAABTCOD#16 APOSTLE#16? FUB#3
    FUB KotL OSOS#12? UKRMMA#19
     
    Grimly Curmudgeon, Aug 21, 2003
    #20
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.