Energy rationing.

Discussion in 'UK Motorcycles' started by Muck, Sep 10, 2005.

  1. Muck

    deadmail Guest

    BIL used to work for the alternative engergy section at Harwell. From
    what he said it wasn't taken very seriously.

    He worked on wind farms (his PhD was in windflow over turbine blades so
    hence his move into power generation). No bugger wanted them. He
    looked at barrage systems, dunno what happened but these didn't get
    built.

    He had enough of getting nowhere and went into 'private' industry where
    they were trying to setup businesses persuading farmers to grow biomass
    and then setup power stations that generated electricity and sold it to
    the national grid. They couldn't get planning permission anywhere due
    to nimby issues for the sites.

    He's still consulting into the 'alternative' energy field but isn't very
    positive about the prospects. Still after the last 15 - 20 years I'm
    not really that surprised.
    Well, quite but how willing are people to change? I try to use bikes in
    preference to cars but don't think that's enough.
     
    deadmail, Sep 12, 2005
    1. Advertisements

  2. wrote
    It kills seagulls as well.


    The very same R4 channel[1] that you was listening to the other day also
    said that birds are fucking stupid and just fly into the blades of
    windmills cos they can't see them and that we shouldn't have them
    because it breaks birds.


    [1] It might not have been, it could easily have been on the telebox on
    Channel 4 or Discovery but I believe it absolutely anyway cos it was in
    The Media.
     
    steve auvache, Sep 12, 2005
    1. Advertisements

  3. Muck

    deadmail Guest

    It just gets better and better.
    Well, I've not seen piles of dead birds in Denmark or Arizona (there are
    some fucking *massive* windfarms in Arizona- 100 or so seperate turbines
    quite close together.
     
    deadmail, Sep 12, 2005
  4. Muck

    muddy Guest

    We have a giant windfarm here too. The operators have had to shut it
    down certain times of the year for the migratory birds.

    http://www.renewableenergyaccess.com/rea/news/story?id=10401
     
    muddy, Sep 12, 2005
  5. Muck

    platypus Guest

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/life/dispatch/story/0,,1501953,00.html
     
    platypus, Sep 12, 2005
  6. Muck

    Muck Guest

    They could do what the model glider pilots do when they want to fly at
    night and be seen. Light the blades up with electro luminescent strips
    and leds.[1]

    [1]Ok, I'm mostly joking.
     
    Muck, Sep 12, 2005
  7. Muck

    Muck Guest

    There are better hot water tanks too, so you can make a solar water
    heater work better for you. It's with everything though isn't it. If a
    penny per unit can be saved, it will be saved.
     
    Muck, Sep 12, 2005
  8. Muck

    sweller Guest

    The few bob it adds to the capital costs is few bob taken from the
    profits.
     
    sweller, Sep 12, 2005
  9. Muck

    JackH Guest

    I'm just saying... that it'll need a lot of resources, and energy to
    manufacturer them, rather than looking into the financial aspects.

    So long as in the longer term they repay that investment of the Earth
    resources many fold, then it's all good.

    Sure I read somewhere in the past that catalytic converters are actually
    very inefficient and costly in terms of resources and the energy used in
    their manufacturer, by comparison to the benefits that they return, and
    wondered if maybe these would prove to be the same.
    In money, maybe... what about in terms of actual depleting resources?
    "Needs must"... if people want to continue to enjoy the on tap energy they
    currently enjoy.

    Any idea how they compare in terms of resource cost, with something along
    the lines of solar panels, in terms of meeting the energy needs of the
    nation, if say those were adopted instead as the main future source of
    power?
     
    JackH, Sep 12, 2005
  10. Muck

    JackH Guest

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/low/england/kent/3241526.stm

    That'll be why there's a quite sizeable wind farm taking shape off the coast
    of Kent as we speak, will it?

    I'm over that way quite a bit of late, and it all appears to be taking shape
    quite nicely.
     
    JackH, Sep 12, 2005
  11. Muck

    marina Guest

    And I don't understand why all new homes being built now don't also
    have one of the new mini, silent, wind turbines on their roofs - puts
    energy into the grid when there's some over as well as providing most
    of the power one house needs. If we ever do the self build thing,
    we'll do all this and have no need of power supply and, if we have a
    water source, no water and sewage either (compost toilets anyone?).
    That would be really great.


    --
    Marina Mayes - Reading, UK. To email me remove XX from my address
    SR250 - on the road again. BOTAFOT12, BOD#2, BOTAFOS#2
    KotLBOD#s, KotLBOTAFOS#s,IMC#2, Tart#10-19, SR#3
    Original Sinergy - wicked T-shirts for a wicked world: www.originalsinergy.com
    I never give in to fear or blackmail; I always give in to temptation.
    www.pericles.demon.co.uk
    "You're a national treasure" - porl, 18.1.03
     
    marina, Sep 12, 2005
  12. Muck

    wessie Guest

    JackH emerged from their own little world to say
    You seem to have the same SKoGA as BGN. My post specifically related to
    Wales. You snipped that bit though.

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/4674207.stm indicates that whilst the
    Welsh Assembly Govt. is all for the idea of wind generated power there is
    significant resistance from a number of sources.

    Whilst all the politics are resolved companies involved in the production
    of the wind turbines are struggling
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/north_west/4138006.stm
     
    wessie, Sep 12, 2005
  13. Muck

    JackH Guest

    Afraid that's not how it read, if you'd care to look back - maybe if you'd
    specified 'Welsh NIMBYs', rather than referring to 'NIMBYs', and then citing
    one example that happens to be in Wales, you may have a point.
     
    JackH, Sep 12, 2005
  14. Muck

    Donald Guest

    marina wrote:
    snip
    URL or details on that please, I'm interested.
     
    Donald, Sep 12, 2005
  15. Muck

    Catman Guest

    Personally I'd love one, or two.
    --
    Catman MIB#14 SKoGA#6 TEAR#4 BOTAFOF#38 Apostle#21 COSOC#3
    Tyger, Tyger Burning Bright (Remove rust to reply)
    Alfa 116 Giulietta 3.0l (Really) Sprint 1.7 156 TS S2
    Triumph Speed Triple: Black with extra black bits
    www.cuore-sportivo.co.uk
     
    Catman, Sep 12, 2005
  16. Muck

    darsy Guest

    #An Engineer told me before he died...
     
    darsy, Sep 12, 2005
  17. platypus wrote
    So the guardian has it that they don't hurt birds? Who are you going to
    believe, some pre menstrual tree hugging fucking hippy with no brains
    and even less of a clue who says it does or the fearless truth hunting
    reporters from the Guardian who says it don't.


    Hard one.
     
    steve auvache, Sep 12, 2005
  18. Wrong.

    It must be nice to be ignorant..

    Look up things like Gulf Stream switch off, polar ice cap melting. Both
    of which would have *huge* impact on us - and both of which could
    happen very quickly.

    Phil
     
    Phil Launchbury, Sep 12, 2005
  19. 2 phrases:

    Safety
    Nuclear waste

    Now I happen to be a fan of nuclear energy too - but it's by no means
    as simple a solution as you might imagine.

    Phil
     
    Phil Launchbury, Sep 12, 2005
  20. In the sea - it would get corroded and leak. Not good.

    Buried underground - ever heard of earthquakes? Ground water leakage?
    Several thousand tonnes.

    Phil
     
    Phil Launchbury, Sep 12, 2005
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.