Evidence?

Do you ever answer a question?

 

No shit, Sherlock ;-)

 

Two points you do not know what "Spamming" is and incitement to commit
murder is in fact a crime.

 

Please will someone go round Grants house and decapitate the dumb
bastard. Okay, should I wait for plod to come get me, or hand myself
in? Get a grip you fucktard, if "should be shot" amounted to
incitement then every newspaper editor in the country would be serving
time

 

I didn't say it had.

But you were the one who posted that claim here.

And have done so several times since, to no point whatsoever.

 

Bollocks.

No such precedent was established.

His case against the ISPs was thrown out at a stage which does not set
precedent. And rightly so, due to previous precedent.

 

Others can judge that.

 

Repeatedly posting the same drivel over and over again is spamming,
regardless of how true it is.

 

"Go round and decapitate" and "Should be shot" are unequivocal examples of
incitement. Weather you be a Muslim Cleric or a Dosser living in a door way.

 

Its not called spamming is it? its called something else.

 

Im neither. So, like I said, what time is plod coming? Only I want to
make sure I have my best defendant suit ironed.

 

Better not wear a tie as you seem quite hot under the collar as it is.Joking aside in the current climate where attacks have taken place after
Chatroom/Usenet arguments i suggest you temper your language as you would be
an easy nick for any plod and incitement is a serious crime.

 

I think *you* need to spend a few minutes researching 'ken'.

 

No, Im sorry, you're misguided.

"Dear George,
Im afraid that our old school associate Peter is blackmailing me for
all those times we buggered him after rugger practice. Would you be a
dear pal and dispose of him for me? I'll send you a cheque for your
expenses, of course.
Love,
Anthony"

*That's* incitement.

"Hey fuckwit, I wish someone would blow your retarded head off"

*That's* not.
Sorry to piss on your party

 

If its complete toss, generally dont bother.

k

 

<TOG@toil>; <>; <>
wrote in message

Better to be in a kill-file, than be responsible for killing someone,
through posting idiot "advice" on here wouldnt you say?

k

 

I suggest you read the Eady judgment, made when bunts claims against the
ISP's were struck out!

k

 

Especially the final paragraph.

 

Well what made you impotent then?

 

bunt has no standing, except perhaps in the eyes of those that have paid him
money, or who are as stupid as he is himself, or who are unaware of his
appalling past
conduct!