Exposed: Motorbike riders are dangerous psychopathic anarchists

So do some car drivers.

speeds.

I saw two dickheads in utes with radio antennas that could talk to Mars
doing that this morning. What's your point?

But not so much as Lebs in Commodores and Subarus.

I had ditzy blonde in a Subaru do the same thing. Your point?

I guess you haven't driven around Sydney's west. Grown men wearing Holden
jackets driving Commodores do the same thing.

I guess you didn't hear about what happened at St Mary's recently.

 

I recall you're a fuckwit but hey did I have to mention it ? Oh .. yes.

 

Motorbike riders are dangerous psychopathic anarchists?

I am not dangerous!

Boxer

Harmless psychopathic anarchist.

 

that's your objection to motorcyclists? that they make you nervous?
surely there are far more pressing problems facing you in the course
of your daily commute (there's a big assumption that you have a job
there) than that?

judging by the tone and nature of your posts, your concern for
motorcyclists and motorcycling is clearly not based in any interest
you have in their welfare.

so i'm struggling to see what your real objection is. i suspect you're
just being a trolling dickhead as usual.

in my experience of riding, it's amazing the hostility you get from a
minority of car drivers. (the majority are not hostile, although it's
hard to tell who's who). i can only presume it's drawn out of the base
human instinct to alienate anything that's perceived as non
conforming, different or in a minority.

one driver once justified his negligent behaviour behind the wheel to
me, in between trying to carry on a phone conversation, by saying "all
you bikers break the law!" clearly betraying the belief that all
bikers are part of a gang or club that must share in the consequences
for their collective behaviour.

with that in mind i'm forced i agree with you, motorcycling is
dangerous.

 

I'm a mostly harmless psychopathic anarchist.

Fraser

 

Yeah right - here's what happens when motorcyclists decide the road
rules don't apply to them:


http://tinyurl.com/8ycu6

"The Honda rider was traveling at such a "very high speed", his
reaction time was not sufficient enough to avoid this accident.
Swedish Police estimate a speed of ~250 KM/h (155mph) before the bike
hit the side of the slow moving car at an intersection. At that speed,
they predicted that the rider's reaction time (once the Volkswagen
came into view) wasn't sufficient enough for him to even apply the
brakes.

The car had two occupants and the bike rider was found INSIDE the car
with them, along with the motorcycle itself.

Left (and top left) The Honda burst into the VW through the front
passenger door.

Right Damage to the driver's seat gives only some indication of the
violence of the impact.

The Volkswagen actually flipped over from the force of impact and
landed 10 feet from where the collision took place.
All three involved (two in the car, plus the rider) were killed
instantly.

At 250 KM (155 mph) the operator is traveling at 227 feet per second.
With normal reaction time to SEE-DECIDE-REACT of 1.6 seconds the above
operator would have traveled over 363 feet while making a decision on
what actions to take. In this incident the Swedish police indicate
that no [such] actions were taken.

 

I see you can't refute the statement. Why don't you go back to screaming
about homosexual conspiracies?

Wow, you picked one accident from years ago. Well done, arfa.

 

<snip a news story about an accident caused by a motorcyclist going too
fast>

You're not trying to say that all motorcyclists ride like that, are you?

I'm sure you'll agree with me that there are idiotic operators of motor
vehicles of all kinds. And I'm sure you'll agree with me that the
occupants of cars are much better protected from impacts than
motorcyclists are. It stands to reason that at reasonable traffic
speeds, the motorcyclist is in far greater danger of injury than the car
occupant.

I don't see crazy bikers riding that fast very often; I do see crazy
cagers driving that fast every day. But that's probably because there
are more cagers than there are bikers.

I drive a car and I ride a motorcycle. I don't think that this "us v.
them" mentality is going to solve anything. When I drive, I'm extra
careful about motorcyclists; when I ride, I'm extra careful.

I suggest that we should all be more cautious when driving. Bikers
should be more aware of their surroundings and pay attention to what
cagers distracted by cell phones and whatnot will do. And because bikers
are more vulnerable to injury, cagers should pay more attention to their
surroundings and do things like looking before changing lanes.

If you think that you can be less careful about motorcyclists because
you think bikers are all "dangerous psychopathic anarchists", then you
should reexamine your own motivations and consider whether you should be
driving at all.

(For the record, when I'm riding, I'm not nearly as dangerous to you as
you are to me. I'm not psychopathic; I care about the suffering of
others and I'm not all that good at manipulating others. And I'm not an
anarchist; I'm a social democrat with some libertarian economic views.)

 

<frown> Trouble is.. we are getting too much bleed over from cagers
who are determined to ride a motorcycle.. Most of them are Republicans
which accounts for their bad attitudes and lousy dispositions..

Bill Walker
Irving, Tx.

 

<snip>

People - you have ALL been trolled.

Look at the Newsgroup: line for ****'s sake.

HTH. HAND.

Andy.