fame :)

Sarah or Michael?

<devils advocate>

Did he?

</da>

 

You're my role model.

Not really.....

 

Have you not joined the other sheep in lobbing me in a killfile yet, then?

Shame on you.

 

My killfile is empty.

I am not a number.

You're doing yourself no favours with this narcissistic personality
shit btw, it didn't work for Des and it certainly won't work for you
so why don't you just do the grown up bit and disagree when you think
someone is wrong and agree when you think they're right?

You'll be called a **** plenty of times but at least you won't come
across as someone who'd trawled the internet searching for something
that you think will make you look clever then spoiling it by spelling
it wrong for a day or two.

 

<applause>

About time we had a fucking good rattle throwing

Paul.

 

So is mine... well no, I lie.

Spacker is in there.

I don't expect I am.

But I happen to think given the traits he's displayed on and off for the
bulk of the coming up for what must be ten years I've spent around these
parts on and off, that it's a logical explanation for why he's such so
domineering and obnoxious at times, and that after such a long and lengthy
period of sporadic outbursts from him maybe it was time to openly question
why he does it, and why its seemingly so acceptable for him to carry on like
he does at times in here.

Or perhaps you think some of his outbursts are 'normal'?

I certainly didn't think the outburst of last week regarding his R1 was
'normal' given it came out of nowhere and had a ferocious and unpleasant
slant to it that wasn't deserved at all, given the nature of the comments
which kicked it off.

And with regards to what I've said since, unless I'm mistaken no-one has
actually said 'Look, he's not like the traits you reeled off at all' and
then reasoned why to any real degree have they, bar a cursory 'utter
cobblers' from himself and 'it's only a Bear' from others.

I happen to think Bear has his part to play in this group... I just wish
he'd **** off with the more domineering shit.

And I can assure you I'm not the only one who thinks this, but there are a
few others out there who feel the same but can't be arsed with the fallout
from 'standing up to be counted' (1), where he's concerned.

'Why don't you killfile him?'

Why? Because such a high volume of the posts in here are from him and in
reply to him; ergo killfiling him does little given you're still seeing the
replies from others, and besides that, he actually offers up some decent
posts at times worth reading.

In short, as above, I'd prefer it if he wouldn't mind 'reining it it in a
little' at times as it's spoiling the group for others, but given what he
appears to be afflicted with mentally, I fear that's asking a little too
much.

Yes, you can lump me in with that twat if makes you feel better, but it
won't change the facts of the above.

I do this all the time; it's called debate.

In fact I'm doing it now really.

I appreciate that when I first showed up in this group, I came across as
something of an arrogant ****.

But I've proven since I can play nice when I want to, and that's normally
'most of the time'.

I didn't trawl the internet for anything; a spelling mistake on what could
perhaps be considered a fairly obscure word, doesn't lessen its meaning.

You all knew exactly what I meant (2), spelling mistake or otherwise.

(1) Or should that be 'cunted'
(2) Although I'm not sure some of you did tbh.

 

What! Dose F(cking C)nts. Why, I'd kick them in the )rse.

I've noticed several sites like that, some of them unexpurgated and
others with an auto-censor, so I saved them some electrons.
The really cheeky bit is that many of them have a posting option.

 

I reckon presenting that will result in the Police wasting an awful
lot of your time.

Personally, my dealings with the Police generally involve "Yes Sir, No
Sir, Three bags full Sir" and me fucking off sharpish. No point
creating hassle for yourself.

 

Celebrity narcissists

http://malignantselflove.tripod.com/faq19.html

http://malignantselflove.tripod.com/journal73.html

Narcissists as Drama Queens

http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/narcissisticabuse/message/4948

The Narcissist as Know-it-all

http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/narcissisticabuse/message/4945

For a more detailed view of pathological narcissism and the
Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD) - click on these links:

http://malignantselflove.tripod.com/npdglance.html

http://samvak.tripod.com/personalitydisorders12.html

http://malignantselflove.tripod.com/personalitydisorders13.html

http://malignantselflove.tripod.com/personalitydisorders14.html

http://malignantselflove.tripod.com/narcissismglance.html

http://malignantselflove.tripod.com/faq1.html

Other Personality Disorders

http://malignantselflove.tripod.com/faqpd.html

Pathological Narcissism diagnosed with Other Mental Health Disorders

http://malignantselflove.tripod.com/faq82.html

NPD (Narcissistic Personality Disorder) and AsPD (Antisocial
Personality Disorder, Psychopathy, or Sociopathy)

http://malignantselflove.tripod.com/personalitydisorders16.html

http://malignantselflove.tripod.com/personalitydisorders15.html

Cyber Narcissist

http://malignantselflove.tripod.com/journal67.html

 

Far cry toff.

 

It depends on why they've pulled you really but if it's a standard 'stop and
search for no good reason', then I'd be more than happy to shove the above
under their nose and see what transpires not least because all the time
they're wasting plenty of your time, they're not wasting someone elses.

That's all well and good here in 'the real world', but over in 'Brunstrom
Land' whereby given the scenario outlined by Steve Parry plod appears
determined to make biking as undesirable as possible by way of the effective
persecution of persons who just happen to be using a mode of transport
they've decided to target in a heavy handed way, I reckon the occasional
'taking a hit for the team' time wise is worthwhile.

 

Some are quite similar to their usenet personas, others are massively
different. So it's certainly an unreliable method.

 

I'm quite different, right?

 

Tou're 'special'.

 

"fewer"

 

Is that a semi-Freudian "Tourettes" going on there?