Febreze vs Perfume

Discussion in 'Australian Motorcycles' started by Duncan, Nov 17, 2003.

  1. Duncan

    Duncan Guest

    Febreze wins.

    Regarding my previous post 'Deperfuming Helmets' I can now report that
    Febreze does pretty much mask out perfume smells in Jackets and
    helmets.

    Personaly I prefered them smelling of perfume but the Febreze is much
    more anonymous. Now they smell like the house of a compulsive
    cleaner...

    Cheers,
    Duncan.
     
    Duncan, Nov 17, 2003
    #1
    1. Advertisements

  2. On 17/11/03 11:10 AM, in article
    Whats the active in Febreeze?

    Hammo
     
    Hamish Alker-Jones, Nov 17, 2003
    #2
    1. Advertisements

  3. Duncan

    Centurion Guest

    According to http://www.ciao.co.uk/Febreeze__Review_5142664:

    WHAT?S IN IT ?

    This appears to be a closely guarded secret! Looking at the bottle in front
    of me it doesn?t list any active ingredients or a patented formula name.
    The product label just says ?contains amongst other ingredients,
    preservative?, P & G appear to be deliberately vague about the contents of
    this magic concoction! The only information P&G mention in their literature
    is that it contains some sort of proprietary active system in a water
    solution that is designed to clean away odours in fabrics.

    Upon further investigation I have found the active ingredient of Febreze to
    be a cyclodextrin, that?s often used in cleaning supplies and helps reduce
    unpleasant smells. Cyclodextrin is a sugar like compound that traps the
    odour molecules. The odour molecules would still be present in the fabric
    but you wouldn?t be able to smell them, they would be masked. Once the
    molecules are trapped your noses will not be able to smell any further.
    Please do understand that these odour causing molecules are still present
    within the fabrics, it?s just that they are masked, Febreze is not intended
    as a replacement to cleaning.

    P&G infact appear to have a few series of cyclodextrins that they have
    patented for use in this area of home fabric freshening and cleaning
    especially with home dry cleaning kits, which do not use toxic agents such
    as Perchloroethylne, which is used in conventional dry cleaning. So more is
    yet to come....

    <<< END QUOTE >>>

    So Hammo - is this "cyclodextrin" likely to eat our helmets faster than boat
    load of starving asylum seekers can polish off a 5 course Chinese banquet
    at the local "Peking Moon"?

    --James
    ZZR250==>ZX9R
    __________________________________
    A random quote of nothing:

    Documentation:
    Instructions translated from Swedish by Japanese for English
    speaking persons.
     
    Centurion, Nov 17, 2003
    #3
  4. Duncan

    Centurion Guest

    Also found this (might make more sense to those who have a bio-chemical
    warfare background):

    http://search.msn.com/results.asp?RS=CHECKED&UN=doc&CO=20&FORM=MSNH&MT=febreze

    --James
    ZZR250==>ZX0R
    __________________________________
    A random quote of nothing:

    Leave bigotry in your quarters; there's no room for it on the bridge.
    -- Kirk, "Balance of Terror", stardate 1709.2
     
    Centurion, Nov 17, 2003
    #4
  5. Well, try it in your lid and report the results!

    Don¹t know I've got a wriggly monkey to look after currently. Thoughas
    0lo0n

    Hammo

    What did ya expect from a lowly house husband?
     
    Hamish Alker-Jones, Nov 17, 2003
    #5
  6. Duncan

    Dave Mojo67 Guest

    I guess you'd have to be happy you didn't have to resort to all those vomit
    suggestions that were posted!
     
    Dave Mojo67, Nov 17, 2003
    #6
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.
Similar Threads
Loading...