FOAK email hacking

Discussion in 'UK Motorcycles' started by 'Hog, Nov 19, 2009.

  1. 'Hog

    'Hog Guest

    Extreme oddity.

    Two people I know had their hotmail/live accounts hacked recently. There
    have no shared acquaintances and live in different places. General
    nuisance was caused by sending emails that had passed between them to
    other people with malicious post editing.

    We all hear of individual accounts being hacked but I'm struggling to
    imagine how this could happen unless hotmail has a malicious techie?
    both claim to have had strong passwords, changed occasionally.

    Heard anything like it before?

    Do Plod have a cybercrime department which deals with such things: i.e.
    not just obsessed with kiddie porn
     
    'Hog, Nov 19, 2009
    #1
    1. Advertisements

  2. 'Hog

    B650 Guest

    Probably signed up to some dodgy website using the same password as
    the email account. I've had a number of emails from acquaintances
    singing the praises of dodgy chinese electronics sites using less than
    grammatically correct engrish.

    Odd that the 'hacker' has just been causing mischief though, they
    usually get put to money-making purposes.

    No shared acquaintances, other than you? There's a logical conclusion
    in there somewhere....
     
    B650, Nov 19, 2009
    #2
    1. Advertisements

  3. 'Hog

    TOG@Toil Guest

    No. What is odd is that it's the same behaviour applied to two totally
    different hotmail accounts, and that the behaviour is essentially
    harmless (when you consider what could have been done). That suggests
    to me that it's the same perp, and that the perp is someone who knows
    at least one of those people, is quite possibly considered a friend,
    and that the two victims have been sloppy with security. Perhaps
    logging on with the perp standing by, and the perp memorised one PW
    and then managed to find the other.
    Yes, but they wouldn't care about this.
     
    TOG@Toil, Nov 19, 2009
    #3
  4. 'Hog

    'Hog Guest

    I rather tripped myself up at the beginning of the email. No shared
    acquaintance other than me! But in fact I don't know one of them except
    in passing. I'm sure it wasn't me <checks mirror and medication>

    But is has just moved on this morning. Looks like it started on one side
    of the equation, someone with a grudge who managed to guess a password.
    They picked up on the 2nd victim by reading all the 1st victim's emails
    I think. But how they gained access to that account is a mystery. I
    don't think you can hack Hotmail with brute force.

    Perhaps a child's name or somesuch that was mentioned in an email to
    victim one.
     
    'Hog, Nov 19, 2009
    #4
  5. 'Hog

    TOG@Toil Guest

    Hotmail is remarkably hard to hack. Yahoo used to be much easier: I
    haven't for years. There used to be a Java vulnerability whereby you
    could be copied in on all correspondence.

    Once you've got one PW, it's remarkably easy to obtain more. It's like
    picking a little hole in a sweater: all of a sudden the thing
    unravels.

    I'd still lay odds that the perp was/is known personally to the first
    victim.
     
    TOG@Toil, Nov 19, 2009
    #5
  6. 'Hog

    Krusty Guest

    Well deduced Holmes.
     
    Krusty, Nov 19, 2009
    #6
  7. 'Hog

    TOG@Toil Guest

    Well, uh, duh. But I don't mean that the email addie was harvested
    from a guestbook or somesuch.
     
    TOG@Toil, Nov 19, 2009
    #7
  8. 'Hog

    Beav Guest

    You're obsessxed with bestiality porn too?


    --
    Beav

    VN 750
    Zed 1000
    OMF# 19
     
    Beav, Nov 19, 2009
    #8
  9. 'Hog

    'Hog Guest

    It was an ex friend with some sort of grudge. I'm trying to get them to
    report it to Plod.
     
    'Hog, Nov 19, 2009
    #9
  10. Told you.
    Waste of time.
     
    The Older Gentleman, Nov 19, 2009
    #10
  11. 'Hog

    Cab Guest

    I've recently seen a demo from one of the security experts in my
    company and it's remarkably easy to get peoples email addies.

    He set up a free hotspot with a commonly recognised name (call it X
    but could be ANY free hotspot such as McDonalds, etc) and because he
    used an access point that had stronger signal strength than the
    regular access point, PC's automatically connected to his.

    In the access point, there was a web server with an identical copy of
    the X login page and a link to gmail (for example). Users would go
    over to gmail and the welcome page was, again, identical to the gmail
    login page. When the user entered the login/password, they were
    redirected to the regular gmail page with all their emails, etc. What
    users didn't know is that on the gmail login page, they had their
    login/password harvested when they hit the submit button.

    It's extremely easy to do and really isn't rocket science.
     
    Cab, Nov 20, 2009
    #11
  12. 'Hog

    TOG@Toil Guest

    Some people *cough* used to do something similar with Yahoo mail (but
    not the hotspot) a few years ago. Redirect to an identical login page,
    and harvest the username and PW. Incredibly basic stuff, as you say,
    and superceded now, but it still works as a technique. And with the
    refinement of a powerful hotspot, I can see it working perfectly.
     
    TOG@Toil, Nov 20, 2009
    #12
  13. 'Hog

    Jim Guest

    The solution to that is to use

    https://gmail.com/

    It's incredibly basic stuff.
     
    Jim, Nov 20, 2009
    #13
  14. 'Hog

    Colin Irvine Guest

    I've used a couple of hotspots in cafes abroad for email. In every
    case I had to get a password from behind the counter. I'm not saying
    that's completely secure, but presumably it's at least safe from the
    kind of harvesting you mention here. Or is it?
     
    Colin Irvine, Nov 20, 2009
    #14
  15. 'Hog

    Cab Guest

    It's safer but you're still not immune. Even so, all a hacker needs to
    do is set up an identical page which requests your login/password,
    pretends to give you full internet access (without even worrying about
    whether the login/password you've been provided with is valid or not)
    and carries on doing the harvesting as I described above.

    Even if you go to an https page, it's still possible to do the same.
    In fact, you'd believe that you're more secure going to a https page
    and will worry less about these sort of harvesting attempts.

    GPRS connections (whilst not 100% secure) are actually much, much more
    secure than bog standard wifi connections.
     
    Cab, Nov 20, 2009
    #15
  16. 'Hog

    Cab Guest

    I think you've missed the point.
     
    Cab, Nov 20, 2009
    #16
  17. 'Hog

    Jim Guest

    Why do you say that? The way certificate signing with HTTPS works is
    specifically designed to prevent this kind of man-in-the-middle attack.
    If the access point is subverted you'll get a certificate warning, which
    is quite difficult to bypass with more recent browsers.
     
    Jim, Nov 20, 2009
    #17
  18. 'Hog

    Cab Guest

    You'd be surprised at how many people accept invalid certificates or
    don't look at the details of certificates to check their authenticity.

    Most issues can be overcome with common sense.
     
    Cab, Nov 20, 2009
    #18
  19. 'Hog

    Cab Guest

    Okay, but tell me, do you check every time when you go to gmail that the
    login page is https? And, as I posted elsewhere, people don't always check
    the validity of certificates (even if they have a bloody great warning page
    pop up).

    It's down to education though. But people don't generally receive security
    training courses on internet and PC usage.
     
    Cab, Nov 20, 2009
    #19
  20. You'd be surprised at how many CERN pages I have to click past an
    "invalid certificate" warning...
    --
    Ivan Reid, School of Engineering & Design, _____________ CMS Collaboration,
    Brunel University. Ivan.Reid@[brunel.ac.uk|cern.ch] Room 40-1-B12, CERN
    GSX600F, RG250WD "You Porsche. Me pass!" DoD #484 JKLO#003, 005
    WP7# 3000 LC Unit #2368 (tinlc) UKMC#00009 BOTAFOT#16 UKRMMA#7 (Hon)
    KotPT -- "for stupidity above and beyond the call of duty".
     
    Dr Ivan D. Reid, Nov 22, 2009
    #20
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.