FOAK: VMWare - creating a VM from a running machine

Discussion in 'UK Motorcycles' started by Wicked Uncle Nigel, Dec 6, 2009.

  1. Some time ago I remember VMWare released a tool that you could run on an
    existing machine, and it would create a VM of that machine.

    Now my Google mojo has deserted me and the ravaged corners of my memory
    are empty. A search of the VMware site is fruitless.

    Anyone?
     
    Wicked Uncle Nigel, Dec 6, 2009
    #1
    1. Advertisements

  2. Wicked Uncle Nigel

    ginge Guest

    VMware Converter.

    http://www.vmware.com/products/converter/

    HTH
     
    ginge, Dec 6, 2009
    #2
    1. Advertisements

  3. Chris Bartram, Dec 6, 2009
    #3
  4. Wicked Uncle Nigel

    Cab Guest

    Cab, Dec 6, 2009
    #4
  5. Using the patented Mavis Beacon "Hunt&Peck" Technique, ginge
    That's the badger! Thanks.
    It did. You should feel good about yourself, helping the elderly and
    infirm like that.
     
    Wicked Uncle Nigel, Dec 6, 2009
    #5
  6. Wicked Uncle Nigel, Dec 6, 2009
    #6
  7. Wicked Uncle Nigel

    Catman Guest

    It is quite remarkable, to be sure.

    --
    Catman MIB#14 SKoGA#6 TEAR#4 BOTAFOF#38 Apostle#21 COSOC#3
    Tyger, Tyger Burning Bright (Remove rust to reply)
    116 Giulietta 3.0l Sprint 1.7 GTV TS 156 V6 2.5 S2
    Triumph Sprint ST 1050: It's blue, see.
    www.cuore-sportivo.co.uk
     
    Catman, Dec 6, 2009
    #7
  8. Wicked Uncle Nigel

    'Hog Guest

    <reads>
    Good lord that's incredibly cool and not a little impressive

    Our image enabled oncology EMR system is currently refusing to run stably
    for a full day, though it freezes for only brief periods. It is a large
    application suite and a very large SQL Server dB. Extensive monitoring on
    the application, database, hardware and network have been inconclusive.
    Pointers at best and by last week we had improved and updated the
    application etc as much as is available or practical.

    I'm left thinking that there is an obscure and nigh impossible to diagnose
    hardware issue on the server or that the application has a weakness that the
    few centres of similar size (overseas) have masked with much more powerful
    hardware. So somehow we may have to move to a 2008 64bit environment with N
    processors. But the patient volumes are such that the services must run 5
    days a week without fail.

    So suddenly a VM environment comes to mind. I wonder how difficult it is to
    migrate a service into a parallel VM environment, migrate an image to
    different hardware, test then possibly reverse back out to straight OS mode.
     
    'Hog, Dec 6, 2009
    #8
  9. Wicked Uncle Nigel

    Catman Guest

    'Hog wrote:

    It's an old trick, but it might just work :)

    --
    Catman MIB#14 SKoGA#6 TEAR#4 BOTAFOF#38 Apostle#21 COSOC#3
    Tyger, Tyger Burning Bright (Remove rust to reply)
    116 Giulietta 3.0l Sprint 1.7 GTV TS 156 V6 2.5 S2
    Triumph Sprint ST 1050: It's blue, see.
    www.cuore-sportivo.co.uk
     
    Catman, Dec 6, 2009
    #9
  10. Wicked Uncle Nigel

    ginge Guest

    Not difficult at all - I've been involved with a project that's done
    loads of that sort of thing lately.
     
    ginge, Dec 6, 2009
    #10
  11. Wicked Uncle Nigel

    DozynSLeepy Guest

    I would have thought once it's a Virtual machine, leave it there.

    http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/08/31/microsoft_hyperv_download/

    All the VMware guys will throw their hands up in horror but I've used
    the Microsoft Hyper-V. It's fairly simple to setup and use with the full
    GUI install. If you've already forked out for a Windows 2008 server
    license for your 64 bit kit then it's an easy option.

    Saying that VMware ESXi is free and does do away with the parent host OS.
    http://www.vmware.com/products/esxi/
    Usual marketing ploy of having to pay for the really useful features
    does apply though !
     
    DozynSLeepy, Dec 6, 2009
    #11
  12. Wicked Uncle Nigel

    Adrian Guest

    Oh, it works. It's dog slow, though, and still (since it's basically
    Windows) likes the host restarting every now and then.
    ESXi free is a bit of a PITA - the hardware compatibility is limited, and
    (for what we use it for) the big drawback is lack of flexibility to run
    monitoring agents/VM snapshotting/backup tools/etc on the host hardware.

    Which is why we've stuck with "full fat" host OS (some Windows, some
    Linux) and VMWare Server.
     
    Adrian, Dec 6, 2009
    #12
  13. Wicked Uncle Nigel

    Gavin Guest

    Which is why the smart guys run it on Server Core.
    --
    Gavin.

    GSXR600K1
    Twitter: http://twitter.com/gavin_wilby
    Blog: http://www.stoof.co.uk
     
    Gavin, Dec 6, 2009
    #13
  14. I'm a bit behind with this one. I've come across plenty mentions of
    VMWare but never actually tried it.
    Will this enable me to load Linux (Ubuntu, for example) on my PC, and
    load in a VMWare image of my current XP setup on top of it? From what I
    see, any viral infections and software faults are simply dealt with by
    reloading the VMWare image. Is there anything to be gained by this,
    apart from that? Iow, would I see a net gain in performance by the
    system being built on Linux, or is there a processing penalty to be paid
    that would effectively result in a slower PC?
    Also, it occurs to me that a machine upgrade would be incredibly easy,
    if this VMWare isn't hardware-dependent.
     
    Grimly Curmudgeon, Dec 9, 2009
    #14
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.