[URL]http://pizdaus.com/single.php?id=25284[/URL]
Hmm, I have to say that the idea that the camera managed to pan quick enough for the bike to be only slightly blurred while the rest of the image is sharp at that speed highly unlikely. Even more unlikely is that the camera remained still as the bike passed. Basically, that bike is not going at 315km/h. -- Veggie Dave UKRMHRC#2 BOTAFOF#08 IQ 18 FILMS http://www.iq18films.com POST PRODUCTION http://www.iq18films.co.uk Toxic Shock Syndrome Gets More Girls Than Me
Amazing sign that. It knew the rider and/or photographer was English-speaking. -- Dave GS850x2 XS650 SE6a "A scone and tea at half past three Makes the day a little brighter Keep your cakes and fancy tarts And stick them up your shiter."
True. 315km/h = 87.5m/s So in 1/1000 second it would only move 8.75cm. Feasible in the light available but depth of field is suspiciously, errr, deep. Nahh, the camera must be still. Probably not, but Lozzo doesn't care.
Hmmm - am I the only one to notice how narrow the display is for three digits? If that sign tried to display 325 it wouldn't fit!
I suspect Scraggy's picking up on Canada being a LHD country, given the highlighting. Umm, yes, it is. Not, obviously, on a bike... I'm not quite that daft. It's an easier shorthand than "drive on the right side of the road - that's right, not as in correct but as opposed to the left, which would be the wrong side. IYSWIM."