Heads up ...

Discussion in 'UK Motorcycles' started by Steve Parry, Apr 5, 2009.

  1. Steve Parry

    Beav Guest

    As well you should be, but if you can't you can always fill your tyre with
    Slime or other tyre sealing shite and it won't blow out.
    I wasn't aware a life strategy was under discussion.
    It's only late after the event. I'm quite sure they knew they lived in an
    earthquakey area before they had one hit.
    Who's playing the blame and prevention game? You said accidents can't all be
    avoided, I say they can.
    Ahh, so now it's down to degrees which fucksd up your "accidents can't all
    be avoided" argument.
    Degrees again.
    Did I say that they don't? No.
    So there's no real point to having any accident investigated in the hope
    that another similar one could be avoided. What exactly were the
    circumstances of the accident the spoke about in this thread?
    14 years investigating accidents in the industrial sector gives me a slight
    advantage when it comes to finding the cause of an accident and making
    another similar one avoidable without making working practices unmanageable.
    And you may ponder why Plod no longer attend Road Traffic Accidents.


    --
    Beav

    VN 750
    Zed 1000
    OMF# 19
     
    Beav, Apr 8, 2009
    #21
    1. Advertisements

  2. Steve Parry

    Alex Ferrier Guest

    You can play this game endlessly, and it will just carry on forever.
    Proving that it is impossible to plan for every outcome.
    Neither was I, but you are the one suggesting vapid ideas
    for the prevention of the unforseeable. You do agree that
    not leaving your home and fulfilling your everday commitments
    to prevent a vanishingly small risk is a daft idea,
    More pointless manouvering.
    And you are still, dead wrong.
    Indeed it is. Nature is chaotic, get used to it.
    Yes, by implication. By suggesting that all accidents are avoidable
    you are suggesting that a mistake by someone was made which began the
    chain of causatory events. Therefore, find the mistake, find the
    avoidable cause, pin the blame.
    Not what I said. Not even close.
    Heh, 14 years of target fixation, seems to have skewed your values
    somewhat.
     
    Alex Ferrier, Apr 8, 2009
    #22
    1. Advertisements

  3. Steve Parry

    Beav Guest

    Go back to my original post in this thread and I believe you'll see that I
    said something along the lines of "If we're being pedantic about it, all
    accidents are avoidable". Now you're whinging because I am?
    Of course it fucking is and I didn't say otherwise. I was being sarcastic
    and pedantic.
    Well if manoeuvring is your thing, maybe you can explain how an earthquake
    is an accident? I always thought it was a natural disaster and I never
    mentioned that they could be avoided. But hey, if you want to move the
    goalposts, feel free.
    So give me a little real proof of that then.
    I don't need to do I. I'm not about to whinge about nature taking its course
    (an opening for you) and I'm not the one whinging about some **** being sent
    down for killing someone and then complaining about it.
    Actually, no and not by definition either. I said that a **** up can be
    trsced back to its source and if action is taken, another **** up in the
    same circumstances wouldn't happen. I wonder what the **** up chummy boy in
    jail did? Maybe he ran a red light, failed to register a bike coming towards
    him and pulled out, farted about with the phone instead of watching and
    thinking about what he ewas doing? What?. Obviously sometihng that NO-ONE
    could have done in the past or is ever likely to do again in the future.

    Not pin the blame, find the cause, but let's be realistic here, sometimes
    someone *is* to blame.
    Seems more than pretty close to me. Dead on, in fact.
    Aye Ok.

    Is that a BMW you ride?


    --
    Beav

    VN 750
    Zed 1000
    OMF# 19
     
    Beav, Apr 8, 2009
    #23
  4. Steve Parry

    Alex Ferrier Guest

    In your original post, you said:

    "All accidents are avoidable (if we're being properly pedantic about it)"

    If we are being 'properly pedantic', that statement is patently untrue.

    Dictionary definition of Accident:
    1. an undesirable or unfortunate happening that occurs
    unintentionally and usually results in harm, injury,
    damage, or loss; casualty.

    An accident, is just that. That is why the police, as you say, no
    longer attend accidents, but incidents. This in no way implies
    though that an incident was not as the result of an accident.
    That is what the police, the investigators and the courts are
    there to do. To make that determination.

    Whether you like it or not, by their very nature, not all accidents
    are preventable. Unless you have infinite knowledge of the problem
    domain and infinite time in which to devise the appropriate prevention
    strategies.

    I had no idea that omnipotence was a requirement for an accident
    investigator, I suspect it is not. In reality, in accordance with
    professional guidelines of which I have no doubt you have a vastly
    greater knowledge of than I. I would hazard a guess that you must
    actually have to scope the problem domain to within acceptable
    limits of risk.

    QED: The fact that there is still unpreventable risk outside those
    limits means in practice, that not all accidents are preventable.

    If you were to say to me, 'the vast majority of accidents are
    preventable', I would have no issue. But since we are being
    pedantic here and you stated that *all* accidents are preventable.
    I feel quite entitled to raise the bullshit flag.
    The earthquake was an undesirable, unfortunate happening that
    occured unintentionally and resulted in harm, injury, damage,
    and loss; casualty. Sounds like an accident to me.

    Sure, most of the resultant harm, damage and loss may have been
    preventable examined in hindsight, but realistically, practically,
    not all. The trouble with hindsight is that it only teaches us
    about the specific event, after the fact. You need a crystal ball
    to predict any and all future 'unfortunate incidents'. Well, that
    or omnipotence.
    Up there ^^
    Nope, still putting words in my mouth. I'm not whingeing about
    anyone being sent down. I don't know the facts, why would I
    whinge.
    So, sometimes no-one is to blame.

    Sure, find the cause. That's different from claiming that every cause is
    preventable. Since in the human scope, that means someone was negligent
    and that therefore, someone is always to blame.
    Suggest reading comprehension classes.
     
    Alex Ferrier, Apr 8, 2009
    #24
  5. Steve Parry

    Beav Guest

    And where does it say that they're unavoidable? Undesirable, unfortunate and
    unintentional, bt nothng about unavoidable.
    Because THEY know accidents are preventable.
    Ok, give me an example of an accident (not a natural disaster please) that
    you consider to be unavoidable.
    So even *you* know that they're avoidable.

    I'm done


    --
    Beav

    VN 750
    Zed 1000
    OMF# 19
     
    Beav, Apr 10, 2009
    #25
  6. Steve Parry

    Alex Ferrier Guest

    Lordy, it took you two days to come up with that?
    It's a bit thin isn't it?
    Heh, be careful out there.
    Oh Sorry, I forgot, you don't need to...
     
    Alex Ferrier, Apr 10, 2009
    #26
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.