Interesting viewpoint

Discussion in 'UK Motorcycles' started by Wicked Uncle Nigel, Jun 27, 2007.

  1. Wicked Uncle Nigel

    Krusty Guest

    Well you'd better drive at 20mph everywhere then in case you lose
    control due to a blow-out, or mechanical failure, or patch of diesel on
    the road, or a deer running out in front of you etc etc.

    --
    Krusty
    www.MuddyStuff.co.uk
    Off-Road Classifieds

    '02 MV Senna '03 Tigtona 955i '96 Tiger '79 Fantic Hiro 250
     
    Krusty, Jun 29, 2007
    1. Advertisements

  2. Wicked Uncle Nigel

    MikeH Guest

    I bet 100% of traction engines could kill someone if they went out of
    control at a steam rally.
     
    MikeH, Jun 29, 2007
    1. Advertisements

  3. Wicked Uncle Nigel

    Ace Guest

    So? The trick we need to learn isn't to hit people at lower speeds,
    but not to hit them at all. Advocating lower speeds doesn't address
    the main issue, which is often insufficient separation between types
    of traffic.

    --
    _______
    ..'_/_|_\_'. Ace (brucedotrogers a.t rochedotcom)
    \`\ | /`/ DS#8
    `\\ | //' BOTAFOT#3, SbS#2, UKRMMA#13, DFV#8, SKA#2, IBB#10
    `\|/`
    `
     
    Ace, Jun 29, 2007
  4. We heard you the first time...
     
    Dave Larrington, Jun 29, 2007
  5. Wicked Uncle Nigel

    Ace Guest

    Sorry, I fucked up the headers, so ukrm wasn't there any more.
    --
    _______
    ..'_/_|_\_'. Ace (brucedotrogers a.t rochedotcom)
    \`\ | /`/ DS#8
    `\\ | //' BOTAFOT#3, SbS#2, UKRMMA#13, DFV#8, SKA#2, IBB#10
    `\|/`
    `
     
    Ace, Jun 29, 2007
  6. Wicked Uncle Nigel

    Ben Guest

    You'll find they were most likely all insured. Pretty near every
    cycling club in the country is affiliated with the BCF or the CTC and
    as part of that they get third party insurance.
     
    Ben, Jun 29, 2007
  7. with studded tires yes! with out no.

    roger
     
    Roger Merriman, Jun 29, 2007
  8. Wicked Uncle Nigel

    Hog Guest

    How about the cunts stop jaywalking instead?
    At 20 one would soon get fed up having to reverse back over them.
     
    Hog, Jun 29, 2007
  9. Wicked Uncle Nigel

    Hog Guest

    The issue is pedestrians not taking care. It's rare for traffic to mount the
    pavement at speed. The fucking roads were paid for 10 times over by tax on
    the vehicles driving on them, not by the cunts walking on them.
     
    Hog, Jun 29, 2007
  10. Wicked Uncle Nigel

    Hog Guest

    I agree completely, again.

    The arguent could be made that driving is an excessive risk for non drivers
    and that vehicles should be banned altogether. Similar to the smoking ban.
    If smokers had been more considerate it might not have happened. Most
    drivers are considerate. The majority of pedestrians run down are
    jaywalking.
     
    Hog, Jun 29, 2007
  11. Wicked Uncle Nigel

    Simon Brooke Guest

    We're talking about a case where a car crossed the road, smashed through a
    group of other road users (who were in the right place on the road minding
    their own business), crossed eight feet of grass verge, bounced of a wall,
    recrossed the eight feet of grass verge, crossed the entire width of an A
    class road, and ended up on the other grass verge.

    There were no pedestrians. So the issue of whether pedestrians take care or
    not has precisely nothing to do with is.
    Road Tax was abolished by Winston Churchill in 1935. The roads, fucking or
    otherwise, are paid for out of general taxation, into which everyone pays.
     
    Simon Brooke, Jun 29, 2007
  12. Wicked Uncle Nigel

    deadmail Guest

    On occasion? You're slipping.
     
    deadmail, Jun 29, 2007
  13. Wicked Uncle Nigel

    Hog Guest

    I wasn't using it as a legal term, though it's a law we need.
    So 120 out of 670. I was about right then.
     
    Hog, Jun 29, 2007
  14. Wicked Uncle Nigel

    Ace Guest

    See, as a driver, cyclist, pedestrian and (now ex-) motorcyclist I
    really don't get this. Speeds should be appropriate to the conditions,
    and clearly in an area with lots of crossings and junctions one should
    drive with due caution for other road users, but I really don't see
    why it should be incumbent on drivers to slow down to such levels as
    to be able to avoid other people who are not proceeding with
    sufficient caution.

    In practice, the vast majority of car/person accidents are not
    primarily caused by the driver, but by a pedestrian (or cyclist) being
    somewhere they shouldn't be. I'd hate to think that I should rely on
    car drivers to avoid me when I'm cycling or walking; no, it's up to me
    to make sure that I don't put myself in danger.

    Of course, there are a relatively small number on accidents caused by
    a driver losing control and mounting pavements, or failing to stop at
    red lights/crossings etc., but these wouldn't be helped by lower speed
    limits anyway.

    --
    _______
    ..'_/_|_\_'. Ace (brucedotrogers a.t rochedotcom)
    \`\ | /`/ DS#8
    `\\ | //' BOTAFOT#3, SbS#2, UKRMMA#13, DFV#8, SKA#2, IBB#10
    `\|/`
    `
     
    Ace, Jun 29, 2007
  15. Shout of Wanker at the end summed it up, really.
    --
    Dave
    GS850x2 XS650 SE6a

    Teach a man to fish and he and his pikey mates will have the
    river cleaned out in a day.
     
    Grimly Curmudgeon, Jun 29, 2007
  16. I was going to say something like "you can tell by looking at which side
    of the road they ride on", but, er.

    It's still the case that most of the riding you see there's not
    especially dangerous, just bloody rude. Going round the right of
    oncoming traffic (e.g. in the bits on New Oxford St when they were on
    the wrong side of the road) probably deserves a slap, as does forcing
    other traffic to give way when going through reds. Forcing
    *pedestrians* to give way deserves a kick in the spokes. But they are
    still showing more road awareness than the average
    up-the-left-side-of-a-bus trundlie. A lot like taxis really: know
    exactly what they're doing but not much respect for anyone else on the
    same road.

    (Disclaimer: I'm talking entirely in a London mindset. Out in the
    sticks it's all different)


    -dan
     
    Daniel Barlow, Jun 30, 2007
  17. Wicked Uncle Nigel

    raden Guest

    The rest are prolly hit by cyclists riding on the pavement
     
    raden, Jun 30, 2007
  18. Saw that. "Danger" in terms of potential for getting a stiff
    ticking-off and possibly a fine: high; *actual* threat to life and limb:
    probably lower that most other vehicles you could have done the same
    thing to. Police drivers are on the whole less likely than average to
    escalate by doing something stupid of their own.


    -dan
     
    Daniel Barlow, Jun 30, 2007
  19. Wicked Uncle Nigel

    Dan L Guest

    I know, I know.
    I do find it hard to get out of car mode when I am on the bike, which
    is very frustrating. I tend to join queues of traffic before it dawns
    on me I really ought to just wriggle up to the front of the queue.

    On the occasions I am out with someone else I find it easier to follow
    their lead and it all sort of falls into place a bit quicker.

    I need to get out on the bike more, and if the weather was better I
    would commute on it when I have office days.

    --
    Dan L

    http://thebikeshed.spaces.live.com/
    1996 Kawasaki ZR1100 Zephyr

    BOTAFOT #140 (KotL 2005/6/7)
    X-FOT#000
    DIAABTCOD #26
    BOMB#18 (slow)
    OMF#11
     
    Dan L, Jun 30, 2007
  20. Wicked Uncle Nigel

    Dan L Guest

    Interesting viewpoint.
    In retrospect "hate list" is probably not the best phrase to have used.
    A better description would be "list of other road users most likely to
    put a big hole in my day and best avoided". WRT bike couriers, without
    exception I have never seen one riding, erm, responsibly.
    Heh, hardly likely [1]. There do seem to be a lot of people out there
    who get very emotional about driving, and have some real anger
    management issues. The twat I encountered on the way to the bike show
    in Feb this year really shook me up.

    [1] If I do encounter a motorcyclist really cutting it fine, whilst
    normally outwardly tutting, the overwhelming sense I have is that I
    wish I could do that (and be in control and enjoy it). You're right, I
    am a bigot.

    --
    Dan L

    http://thebikeshed.spaces.live.com/
    1996 Kawasaki ZR1100 Zephyr

    BOTAFOT #140 (KotL 2005/6/7)
    X-FOT#000
    DIAABTCOD #26
    BOMB#18 (slow)
    OMF#11
     
    Dan L, Jun 30, 2007
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.