I've got my blinker on - I've got the right of way!

Damn... and I've just taken on a new sig-file....

 

No No No No No..
You brush the indicator so it flashes once, then you cross all 3 lanes in
one go to turn right

TB

 

uh, no. One is rude, the other is potentially lethal. Quite the difference IMNSHO

 

Richard Fay said....

Only if the merging vehicle isn't crossing the dotted lines that
delineate the end of the lane. Where there is simply a narrowing of the
road and one lane's formed, with no painted broken lines, then yeah,
you're correct.

If the vehicle has to cross broken lines in order to merge, then it has
to give way.

 

Ahhh = you must have failed "Recognising sarcasm 101".

Stan

 

Naah, I'm easily bored.

Moike

 

drop all the hints you want Moike... atec still won't get it.

Nev..
'03 ZX12R

 

In Victoria they don't have that problem. All traffic must give way to a bus
which is merging back into traffic from a bus stop. Busses here generally
just move back into the lane after a cursory glance in the mirror and let the
traffic behind them sort themselves out.

Nev..
'03 ZX12R

 

We have this system in NSW as well. The "Animal Farm" version of road
user equality.

All road users are equal - but some are more equal than others.


Stan

 

We've got this rule too but it's never enforced so you get these pinheads
who try their hardest to get around the bus, sometimes going right across
the double-white lines just so they don't have to let the bus get in front!
No one's ever booked because the traffic cops are all manning radars and
speed cameras so provided you dont speed (or run red lights) no other road
rules apply.

 

PLEASE DIAGRAM THIS JOKE.

-----sharks

 

Why do you think it's got anything to do with equality. The intention of the
law is to aid the [speedy] movement of public transport at the expense of all
other road users.

Nev..
'03 ZX12R

 

+--------------------------------+
| | <-- the drawer
| |
| |\ <-- the sharpest knife |
| | \ |
| | | ----- |
| | | / \ |
| | | O O |
| | | U |
| | | --- |
| | | atec --> | |
| | | + |
| | | /|\ |
| -+-+- / | \ |
| XXX | |
| XXX / \ |
| XXX / \ |
| XXX |
| XXX |
| XXX |
| XXX |
| |
+--------------------------------+
+-----------+ <-- the drawer handle

Hope that helps...

big

 

BRILLIANT Iain!
Clem
(But I think there should be a shitload more knives in that draw before we
get to atec... and some spoons... and a hammer.... maybe a jellyfish....)

 

LOL Champagne asci comedy.
well done bigi.

 

nothing like me at all . far to anemic .

 

Agreed ... *applause* ...

If I get fired for describing a student as "not the sharpest of
jellyfish" it's ALL YOUR FAULT!

----sharks

 

Deary me, quiet day at work huh?

Cheers

Says me who has spent all day netsurfing ...

 

*applause*

 

<contrite look> Sorry Knob. I've always had difficulty standing by while
the mentally retarded or other unfortunates are taunted. I guess I'm a
"bleeding heart liberal" type.

JL
--
Australian Financial Review 17 August 2004
"So far Howard's luck has survived a great deal: his move to dismiss
broken election pledges by distinguishing between "core" and "non-core"
promises; his retrospectively time-limited "never ever" pledge on the
goods and services tax; his vagueness about when he committed Australia
to war against Iraq; his shifting standards for ministerial conduct; his
demonising of asylum seekers as child killers; his tendency to blame
"advice" rather than to openly accept responsibility when things go wrong."
Will Howard's luck survive another election ? Do Australians not care
that their PM is a liar ?
http://www.johnhowardlies.com/