Motorcycle Running Costs

Discussion in 'UK Motorcycles' started by Big Tony, Oct 8, 2004.

  1. Big Tony

    Big Tony Guest

    I know that the Inland Revenue let you claim 25p / mile for business use and
    one would assume that this should be representative of the cost of running a
    motorcycle.

    However, I found this little gem on the RAC website which concurs with my
    experience of actual runing costs.

    http://www.rac.co.uk/carcare/advice/motorcyclist/Motorcyclerunningcosts.pdf

    So according to the above report you couldn't even run a 125cc bike for 25p
    / mile.

    Isn't it about time the Inland Revenue reviewed their rates?
     
    Big Tony, Oct 8, 2004
    #1
    1. Advertisements

  2. Big Tony

    platypus Guest

    That's assuming you run a bike like a company car, buying new every three
    years, only do 6000 miles a year, join the RAC, don't shop around for
    insurance, and have only one bike. Hmm.
    I guess that's why the RAC has done these figures.
     
    platypus, Oct 8, 2004
    #2
    1. Advertisements

  3. Big Tony

    Chris Soanes Guest

    Yeah, perish the thought that people might actually keep their bikes
    after they've finished paying for them. Or indeed might do their own
    spannering.

    Tiff
     
    Chris Soanes, Oct 8, 2004
    #3
  4. Big Tony

    Big Tony Guest

    I suppose everyone (including me) could come up with chapter and verse on
    how in their particular case the assumptions didn't apply and their cost is
    higher or lower than the stated figures. For everyone who keeps their bikes
    for ages and does their own servicing, there will be people who change their
    bike once a year or more often and cover relatively few miles.

    It just struck me that the figures were more representative of the average
    rider - if such a beast exists.
     
    Big Tony, Oct 8, 2004
    #4
  5. Big Tony wrote
    Bang on the target old bean.


    Younger, less experienced and with underdeveloped fashion senses by the
    looks of the fuel economy, insurance and protective clothing figures.
     
    steve auvache, Oct 8, 2004
    #5
  6. Big Tony

    dwb Guest

    If anything I'd have said they're still too low - particularly on insurance
    and cost of kit.

    At least the fuel consumption figures are a lot more realistic.
     
    dwb, Oct 8, 2004
    #6
  7. Big Tony

    ogden Guest

    I'd own a bike anyway, so depreciation isn't an issue as far as
    business mileage is concerned. Tyres need replacing when they're
    squared off, whether they've done 500 miles or 8000 miles. Chains
    need replacing when they're knackered, whether I've fitted a scotoiler
    or never even waved a can of chain wax at it.

    A trip from my office to docklands costs me about 8 quid (direct) or
    15 quid (motorway) in fuel. I get 23 or 40 quid (ish) in expenses
    which, on a regular basis, makes a nice contribution towards running
    costs for my toy.

    If it's not enough, they can fucking well get me a hire car (as they
    do, most of the time)

    Where's the problem?
     
    ogden, Oct 9, 2004
    #7
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.