Nature's Attitude.....

Discussion in 'Texas Bikers' started by ßjay jøhñ§øñ, Dec 31, 2004.

  1. Hard to believe how the Tsunami disaster could do such astronomical
    damages in such a short period of time. The waves were traviling some
    500.ph @ one time. Now around 130,000 souls have been killed, and 10's
    of thousands missing.
    <>Through the millions of years, such disasters changed landscapes, and
    geographical locations of continents (I-read). Other such natural
    disasters, like mud slides, rivers flooding & changing
    courses,earthQuakes inland, and hurricanes will continue, as we know.
    <>It's been 300 years, since California was hit by a Tsnami, but of
    course it wasnt inhabited by multi millions of folks.
    <>It is very possible for an earthquake out in the pacific, to do its
    thing again.

    ‹›‘Have a Good'un’›››BJAY›››
     
    ßjay jøhñ§øñ, Dec 31, 2004
    #1
    1. Advertisements

  2. ßjay jøhñ§øñ

    Bownse Guest

    X-No-archive: yes

    I thought the bodies were killed. I didn't know souls could be killed. ;-)
     
    Bownse, Dec 31, 2004
    #2
    1. Advertisements

  3. ßjay jøhñ§øñ

    Bill Walker Guest

    Is that MY box, that you're using, today, Fullstate ? <chuckle>... You are
    very welcome to use it, just don't forget who it belongs to..

    Your friend in Irving
    Bill Walker
     
    Bill Walker, Dec 31, 2004
    #3
  4. ßjay jøhñ§øñ

    Bownse Guest

    X-No-archive: yes
    Preach it, Bro!
     
    Bownse, Dec 31, 2004
    #4
  5. Mark Johnson, surely this post/subject has a fairly intersting context,
    that you could actually make a reasonable comment. But, you choose to
    pick out one line of the subject and critize. Does this topic not
    interest you? just wondered, no big deal.

    ‹›‘Have a Good'un’›››BJAY›››
     
    ßjay jøhñ§øñ, Dec 31, 2004
    #5
  6. ßjay jøhñ§øñ

    Bownse Guest

    X-No-archive: yes

    I'm not sure. What one line did I extract and what was my response? I
    really don't have the time to weed back through old Usenet messages
    except on rare occasions. Most news readers don't display already-read
    messages in the list of headers unless they're reconfigured. Most
    people choose not to, since the plethora of read messages tends to
    obscure the list of unread messages; the ones most people seek when
    returning to a newsgroup.
     
    Bownse, Jan 1, 2005
    #6
  7. ßjay jøhñ§øñ

    Bownse Guest

    X-No-archive: yes

    What luck! I found the old post before it dropped off the radar screen.

    Geeze. Am I going to have to hang a banner over every post that
    contains a joke?
     
    Bownse, Jan 1, 2005
    #7

  8. lowest common denominator and all that.
    if they can't use a newsreader...
     
    another viewer, Jan 1, 2005
    #8
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.