New motorcycle engine

Modify an engine by replacing the spark plug with a dual injector for
each cylinder. When the piston is TDC, inject bleach and ammonia at the
same time. There will be rapid expansion of gas pushing the piston down.
Then the mess is blown out the exhaust pipe and then new fresh air is
brought into the intake to repeat the process. Nothing but chloramine
gas out the tail pipe, a disinfectant in municipal water systems.

 

Jesus mate, just do it. Be sure to run the prototype yourself in
an enclosed garage for 30 minutes or so. The Darwin Award is all yours!

--
Ivan Reid, School of Engineering & Design, _____________ CMS Collaboration,
Brunel University. Ivan.Reid@[brunel.ac.uk|cern.ch] Room 40-1-B12, CERN
GSX600F, RG250WD "You Porsche. Me pass!" DoD #484 JKLO#003, 005
WP7# 3000 LC Unit #2368 (tinlc) UKMC#00009 BOTAFOT#16 UKRMMA#7 (Hon)
KotPT -- "for stupidity above and beyond the call of duty".

 

Would it be feasible to use an excess of ammonia and run the resultant
hydrazine over a catalyst in the exhaust, to provide additional thrust?

 

I'm still not sure why it needs to suck in "fresh air".

--
Ivan Reid, School of Engineering & Design, _____________ CMS Collaboration,
Brunel University. Ivan.Reid@[brunel.ac.uk|cern.ch] Room 40-1-B12, CERN
GSX600F, RG250WD "You Porsche. Me pass!" DoD #484 JKLO#003, 005
WP7# 3000 LC Unit #2368 (tinlc) UKMC#00009 BOTAFOT#16 UKRMMA#7 (Hon)
KotPT -- "for stupidity above and beyond the call of duty".

 

I took that as "fresh charge", unless it is an attempt to moderate the
explosion by diluting the ingredients.

 

And aside from the poison gas, and the miserably low power output,
what do you think would be your cost per mile????
MadDog

 

I'm sure the same could be said of gasoline, especially in the age of
electrics before gasoline.
With pure chlorine and purified ammonia descent mileage and power could
be attained. Instead of smelling like French fries it would smell like a
washing machine.

 

Both of these substances are gasses, and both are rather corrosive. How
exactly is this approach better, or even as feasible as, running
Hydrogen, which also returns water as a product?

--
Later,
John



'indiana' is a 'nolnn' and 'hoosier' is a 'solkk'. Indiana doesn't solkk.

 

Go find a bottle of hydrogen.

 

Trivial at an industrial gas company; Try seriously engaging the issues
involved instead of being flip, or stop expecting us to take you
seriously.

On the chance that you are serious, rather than simply trolling, how
about posting theoretical energy yields from your reaction? Cost per
unit mass? How about comparing those to gasoline and Hydrogen? Next
consider that your reactants are substantially diluted if you're using
household chlorine bleach and ammonia solution. So, your cost per unit
of _reaction_ mass is substantially different from your cost per unit of
_carried mass, and your energy yield per unit of fuel mass is
substantially reduced (because most of your "fuel" is actually water).
You will also lose much of your reaction energy to conversion of water
to vapor, unless you find a way of recovering that energy.

--
Later,
John



'indiana' is a 'nolnn' and 'hoosier' is a 'solkk'. Indiana doesn't solkk.

 

Modify an engine by replacing the spark plug with an injector and a
copper screen or potassium permanganate catalyst.

Inject 98% pure hydrogen peroxide into the combustion chamber.

The copper screen or the catalyst will cause the H2O2 to break down
into steam and oxygen.

The pistons will go up and down and the crankshaft will go around and
around, and the exhaust will be eminently breathable.

What could be better for the environment, besides you bathing in the
H2O2?

For more information, google up "Me-163 Komet".

 

Nah, run the engine on silicone oils -- instead of water and carbon
dioxide you'd get water and SiO2. If you can arrange the silica to spray out
of the "exhaust" as random molten droplets you'd have self-surfacing roads!

--
Ivan Reid, School of Engineering & Design, _____________ CMS Collaboration,
Brunel University. Ivan.Reid@[brunel.ac.uk|cern.ch] Room 40-1-B12, CERN
GSX600F, RG250WD "You Porsche. Me pass!" DoD #484 JKLO#003, 005
WP7# 3000 LC Unit #2368 (tinlc) UKMC#00009 BOTAFOT#16 UKRMMA#7 (Hon)
KotPT -- "for stupidity above and beyond the call of duty".

 

Are there available radio-isotopes of these, so that the self-surfaced
road would not only glow in the dark but produce enough heat to keep the
surface ice-free in the most wintery weather?

 

Hmm, 16-, 17-, and 18-O are stable. 15-O is the most stable
radio-isotope, but it's a bit too hot at only two minutes! 32-Si has a
half-life of 132 years, so that's a candidate.

--
Ivan Reid, School of Engineering & Design, _____________ CMS Collaboration,
Brunel University. Ivan.Reid@[brunel.ac.uk|cern.ch] Room 40-1-B12, CERN
GSX600F, RG250WD "You Porsche. Me pass!" DoD #484 JKLO#003, 005
WP7# 3000 LC Unit #2368 (tinlc) UKMC#00009 BOTAFOT#16 UKRMMA#7 (Hon)
KotPT -- "for stupidity above and beyond the call of duty".

 

OK, excellent, this is the germ of a ground-breaking money-spinner. I'm
off to see my patent attorney in the morning.

 

Don't forget the citation! (Or a tithe of the profits...)

--
Ivan Reid, School of Engineering & Design, _____________ CMS Collaboration,
Brunel University. Ivan.Reid@[brunel.ac.uk|cern.ch] Room 40-1-B12, CERN
GSX600F, RG250WD "You Porsche. Me pass!" DoD #484 JKLO#003, 005
WP7# 3000 LC Unit #2368 (tinlc) UKMC#00009 BOTAFOT#16 UKRMMA#7 (Hon)
KotPT -- "for stupidity above and beyond the call of duty".

 

A tithe naturally. (Small (by international monetary standards) deposit
required though. The value of your investment may go down as well as
up.)

 

You said "bleach & amonia" which are relatively safe to handle.
Now you into two war gasses, one flamible and one corrosive.
This is progress???
MadDog

"My invisible friend thinks you have a serious mental problem."

 

'sOK.
These are War materials being used for peaceful purposes, like swords
into ploughshares, innit.