Oops! Another for the aircraftisti

Discussion in 'UK Motorcycles' started by JB, Nov 18, 2006.

  1. JB

    JB Guest

    JB, Nov 18, 2006
    #1
    1. Advertisements

  2. Using the patented Mavis Beacon "Hunt&Peck" Technique, JB
    Well, given that there would very likely have been bells and horns going
    off left, right and centre in the cockpit, and that ATC would have
    probably noticed too, the likeliest explanation would be that the gear
    was stuck.

    Googling doesn't seem to have an answer, but it's probable that the
    enquiry hasn't published its report yet.

    --
    Wicked Uncle Nigel - Podium Placed Ducati Race Engineer as featured in
    Performance Bikes and Fast Bikes

    WS* GHPOTHUF#24 APOSTLE#14 DLC#1 COFF#20 BOTAFOT#150 HYPO#0(KoTL) IbW#41
    SBS#39 OMF#6 Enfield 500 Curry House Racer "The Basmati Rice Burner",
    Honda GL1000K2 (On its hols) Kawasaki ZN1300 Voyager "Oh, Oh, It's so big"
    Suzuki TS250 "The Africa Single" Yamaha Vmax Honda ST1100 wiv trailer
     
    Wicked Uncle Nigel, Nov 18, 2006
    #2
    1. Advertisements

  3. JB

    Tim Guest

    Eh? It says so on the page, so it must be true.
    "The Air Force Accident Investigation concluded the pilots forgot to lower
    the landing gear"
     
    Tim, Nov 18, 2006
    #3
  4. JB

    SD Guest

    The aerodrome controller would have a *lot* of paperwork to fill in if
    there was no comms to the pilot. Binoculars and a flare-gun should
    have been deployed, at the very least.
    --
    | ___ Salad Dodger
    |/ \
    _/_____\_ GL1500SEV/CBR1100XXX/CBX1000Z
    |_\_____/_| ..87753../..22653.../..31893.
    (>|_|_|<) TPPFATUICG#7 DIAABTCOD#9 WG*
    |__|_|__| BOTAFOT #70 BOTAFOF #09 PM#5
    \ |^| / IbW#0 & KotIbW# BotTOS#6 GP#4
    \|^|/ ANORAK#17 IbB#4 YTC#4 two#11
    '^' RBR Clues: 84 Pts:1800 Miles:5704
     
    SD, Nov 18, 2006
    #4
  5. JB

    Alan Guest

    Unless it was from an instrument approach in IMC.
     
    Alan, Nov 19, 2006
    #5
  6. Two things impressed me. One was the fact that it slid for more than a
    mile (must have sounded horrible)! and the other is that the damage to a
    $285 million bomber was only $8 million.
     
    The Older Gentleman, Nov 19, 2006
    #6
  7. JB

    Hog Guest

    There is a notable lack of damage to the airframe. Do that in any
    commercial jetliner and it would be a complete write off. I'm guessing
    it's a heavy duty (armoured) titanium skin and a very strong chassis
    (supersonic capability).
     
    Hog, Nov 19, 2006
    #7
  8. Well, it slid on the engine nacelles and a small piece of the nose
    underside. Most of the fuselage and the wings themselves didn't hit the
    deck at all.
     
    The Older Gentleman, Nov 19, 2006
    #8
  9. JB

    Hog Guest

    Yes but those bits are remarkably intact!
    I've inspected a jumbo that did a hard landing and the nose wheel
    collapsed for a short slide. It was declared a write off.
     
    Hog, Nov 19, 2006
    #9
  10. JB

    Cab Guest

    'twas the cost of damage that got me. Jeez, that's peanuts.
     
    Cab, Nov 19, 2006
    #10
  11. JB

    Beav Guest

    Beav, Nov 19, 2006
    #11
  12. JB

    Alan Guest

    Alan, Nov 19, 2006
    #12
  13. JB

    Pip Luscher Guest

    Presumably a sickening pause when the wheels should have touched,
    followed by a grating sound.
     
    Pip Luscher, Nov 19, 2006
    #13
  14. JB

    Bod43 Guest

    Suspect it's a plastic fantastic. Bit of cloth, bit of resin, fixed.

    As I understand it current military aircraft are mostly composite
    and this construction technique is now migrating towards
    the airliner manufacturers. [Well, both of them:)]
     
    Bod43, Nov 20, 2006
    #14
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.