OT Sort of, it is about speeding

Unless you're in Germany, when you're all frogmarched to the local
branch of the gestaltpolizei for a right royal rogering.

 

Lets put it another way. When an administration starts making law without
reference to those affected and makes it all but impossible to challenge and
change law. What do you think people should do?

I'm referring to things that don't hurt or affect anyone else of course.

As I'm not prepered to let the challenge take over my life and consume all
my finances, as some people do, well one just gives them the finger and FRO
into the distance. Literally and metaphorically.

As for said Supreme Court, what do you think of it? From their own website:

"In August 2009 the Justices moved out of the House of Lords (where they sat
as the Appellate Committee of the House of Lords) into their own building on
the opposite side of Parliament Square. They will sit for the first time as
a Supreme Court in October 2009.
The impact of Supreme Court decisions will extend far beyond the parties
involved in any given case, shaping our society, and directly affecting our
everyday lives"

See that last sentence? Those are the things we should be electing
politicians to do. I can't think of a worse group of people or profession
than Barristers/Judges to "Shape our Society".

 

That doesn't sound like good ol' Anarchy to me so the reply has to be
"Baaaaaaaah"

 

<post corrected>

"Cunts should do exactly as they fucking well please"

 

Who are citizens to decide that it's bad law?

 

Or to put it another way, can we move back to prohibition of women owning
property. Where Women = Ex Wives.

 

Careless - 3-9pts, >£2,500, discretionary ban

Above there, it gets into "real court" territory, with inside-time on the
cards...

Careless whilst uninsured/banned/no licence - 2yrs
http://www.cps.gov.uk/legal/s_to_u/sentencing_manual/
causing_death_by_driving_unlicensed_disqualified_or_uninsured_drivers/

Dangerous - 2yrs
http://www.cps.gov.uk/legal/s_to_u/sentencing_manual/dangerous_driving/

Death by Careless - 5yrs
http://www.cps.gov.uk/legal/s_to_u/sentencing_manual/
causing_death_by_careless_or_inconsiderate_driving/

Careless whilst pissed - 14yrs
http://www.cps.gov.uk/legal/s_to_u/sentencing_manual/
death_by_careless_driving_under_the_influence/

Death by Dangerous - 14yrs
http://www.cps.gov.uk/legal/s_to_u/sentencing_manual/
death_by_dangerous_driving/

Different grades of fuckwittery.

But, no, you wouldn't want to be shouting about 'em...

 

Hmm. Personally, I'm happier with the judiciary being independent from
the government and able to slap bad law back at the idiots who passed it
just so they could get a cheap Daily Wail headline or two.

 

But that is not what they are suggesting at all.

And as we employ an Attorney General there should be no badly drafted law.

 

This "friend" of yours... Would you know him through similar channels to
Hog with his "friend" with the "pool-car" 911, by any chance?

 

That was lucky. When I had missed an SP30 off when we claimed, they
deducted the % difference on the premium from the payout. It was a lot
more than five quid.

Gits.

 

I thought so

Of course, their agents losing the bike in the first place *may* have
had a bearing.


--
Catman MIB#14 SKoGA#6 TEAR#4 BOTAFOF#38 Apostle#21 COSOC#3
Tyger, Tyger Burning Bright (Remove rust to reply)
116 Giulietta 3.0l Sprint 1.7 GTV TS GT 3.2 V6
Triumph Sprint ST 1050: It's blue, see.
www.cuore-sportivo.co.uk

 

<eyes Champ>

Will you do it or shall I

 

<chuckle>

 

"Should". Nice word, that.

 

You can, and probably do, but you should expect to pay for it when caught.

 

As you should very well know surrender isn't an option

 

Actually, I was semi-genuinely playing Devil's Advocate.

What gives your average subject the qualification or ability to decide
that any given law is a bad law?

 

If we didn't nothing would change. Think everything from Suffragettes to
Trade Onions.

 

Coo, so it is. For some reason I thought it topped out at 11. Still,
better that than the ban.

Not just different grades. One's recordable, the other's not. One can
put your DNA on the database, the other...well, prace bets now.