OT Windows Vista

Discussion in 'UK Motorcycles' started by Speedgazebo, Jan 23, 2008.

  1. Speedgazebo

    Speedgazebo Guest

    I have installed Vista Ultimate on my lapdog and want to go back to XP
    pro as I don't like it. Problem is when I put the XP pro CD in, and it
    starts, the option box to install it is greyed out and unavalable. How
    can I reinstall it? Do I need to format the disk and start again?

    Thanks
     
    Speedgazebo, Jan 23, 2008
    #1
    1. Advertisements

  2. Speedgazebo

    Timo Geusch Guest

    Pretty much, yes. MS OSs don't really do "downgrades".
     
    Timo Geusch, Jan 23, 2008
    #2
    1. Advertisements

  3. Aye, save anything you want saving.

    Download the XP drivers for your lapdog, eg - chipset, audio, wireless, vga,
    lan and save them where you saved your other important stuff to.

    Then boot from your XP cd, delete the fista partitions and start clean - its
    the only way - bar taking off and nuking the entire site from orbit.
     
    Brownz \(Mobile\), Jan 23, 2008
    #3
  4. And be aware that when you try to burn the Users folder to a DVDR it
    may well not *actually* burn most of it.

    Or it didn't when I upgraded my Dads PC from Vista to XP. Opps.

    Still - at least he had most of his stuff backed up elsewhere. My Mums
    email got lost though - as did some of her stuff.

    Phil.
     
    Phil Launchbury, Jan 24, 2008
    #4
  5. Speedgazebo

    zymurgy Guest

    I'm persevering with it. The bit that fucks me right off is having to
    buy the latest version of software to get it to run on Vista.

    Still I skipped From Win2K to Vista missing out XP, so at least I
    didn't have to buy more versions.

    I just can't make the break full time over to Linux, reminds me too
    much of work.

    P.
     
    zymurgy, Jan 25, 2008
    #5
  6. Speedgazebo

    zymurgy Guest

    Nice, thanks for that, I knew about the administrator options, but not
    the compatibility mode. There is a Vista KB patch update that does
    increase compatibility with several tools which I have put on, but
    some programs won't even install once they have done a version check.
    Got to keep that revenue stream somehow ... !

    Cheers,

    Paul.
     
    zymurgy, Jan 26, 2008
    #6
  7. Speedgazebo

    zymurgy Guest

    I like your lateral thinking, but in the nicest possible way .... ****
    that !

    I've enough OS's going around my head without thinking about MAC's

    Hmm actually, MAC OSX is Unix derived isn't it.

    I give up.

    P.
     
    zymurgy, Jan 26, 2008
    #7
  8. Speedgazebo

    Ben Guest

    Never tried that.
    It's exactly the fucking same. Admittedly on a Mac it fits better
    with the rest of the UI.
     
    Ben, Jan 27, 2008
    #8
  9. Speedgazebo

    Ben Guest

    Dunno, I've never had an unstable and slow iTunes on any computer.
    Works fine on all the XP machines I've got and seemed to be fine on
    Mac OS Leopard for the whole couple of days I used Mac OS-X for. This
    was with a library of about 600 albums, all with artwork, and ripped
    by my own fair hands in iTunes.

    I think it always feels a bit odd to Windows users because of where
    things like the options and preferences are. In OS-X, they're in
    those places in every program so it all fits.
     
    Ben, Jan 27, 2008
    #9
  10. Speedgazebo

    Ben Guest

    Like I said to BGN, I've never had a problem. Mind you, I don't have
    any slow computers either.
     
    Ben, Jan 27, 2008
    #10
  11. Speedgazebo

    Ben Guest

    That doesn't sound right.
    My scroll wheel works fine and the list scrolls as fast as I can flick
    the wheel in all the display types, including cover flow, which is the
    one I'd expect to be slow.

    I'm running version 7.6 of iTunes on a 2.4Ghz core 2 duo Macbook Pro +
    XP Pro.
     
    Ben, Jan 27, 2008
    #11
  12. Speedgazebo

    John B Guest

    Check heading. DRM issues in Vista is my guess.
     
    John B, Jan 27, 2008
    #12
  13. Partly. Also butt-covering ("we haven't tested it under x so we are not
    going to allow it to work"). Also if the installer only knows about
    Windows versions up to XP it'll get very confused when it gets told a
    version number it doesn't recognise! I've seen installers that check
    for specific versions and refuse to work unless it is those specific
    versions..

    For stuff like anti-virus tools or systems-level stuff (firewalls,
    disc-scanners etc) it's also understandable since different versions of
    Windows do things in different ways so a version designed for Win2k
    almost certainly won't work as expected on Vista. Our test guys at the
    moment are testing all our products on Vista and some of them won't
    even install because Vista throws a wobbly at the (very standard)
    install method involved!

    Phil.
     
    Phil Launchbury, Jan 28, 2008
    #13
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.