Simplistic bollocks for a happier Britain. Trouble with all this Power Of Positive Thinking malarkey is mostly it's neither positive nor thinking very much. -- Dave GS850x2 XS650 SE6a "It's a moron working with power tools. How much more suspenseful can you get?" - House
Naming a key, or a given note, has nothing to do with tone-deafness, or lack of. It's very, very definitely a learned skill - there must be an innate ability, but the naming is putting a learned label on that skill. S'funny, but I don't "think" at all. It's just, well, obvious. If it's a guitar tune I can hear the chord progression and from the strings being intoned, assuming a standard tuning and fingering, can pretty much identify the chords. But if you put a capo on, or tuned it down a tone, I'd not have a clue unless I had a benchmark tone to compare with. -- _______ ..'_/_|_\_'. Ace (b.rogers at ifrance.com) \`\ | /`/ `\\ | //' BOTAFOT#3, SbS#2, UKRMMA#13, DFV#8, SKA#2, IBB#10 `\|/` `
Actually, that's wrong. Whether the drain is on your property or not is irrelevant - the salient point is whether you connect to the drain. If you do use the drain and it is defective, then you will be partly liable for the costs of maintenance and repairs, jointly with any other people also using the drain. I'd be on to my house insurance provider, too. This assumes that the drain hasn't been adopted by the council, isn't a public sewer and wasn't constructed before 1936, in which case repairs come out of the public purse. Location is not important - trust me on this one.
Using the patented Mavis Beacon "Hunt&Peck" Technique, Pip <G> You know that bit where it says "There's an expert on *everything* in UKRM"? God, I love this place.
heh. Mate of mine lived in a flat in Aylesbury, the balcony overlooked a block of garages used by another bunch of flats. There was a drummer-in-training in one of the garages, who had obviously been summarily ejected from his domicile for being so crap. For weeks and weeks we could hear half-rolls and dodgy diddles coming from the garage, punctuated from time to time by sudden silences, rattles of sticks hitting concrete and inadvertent rimshots. High-pitched cries of pain were not uncommon and neither were odd percussive cracks and rattles, as of stick(s) contacting garage door. It was a little intrusive, but never lasted more than 10 minutes at a stretch, which was apparently the proto-percussionist's attention span.
Singing's a bit of a special case - as can be heard every time some tuneless **** wins a talent show simply because the 'judges' don't know what a properly sung note sounds like. -- Dave GS850x2 XS650 SE6a "It's a moron working with power tools. How much more suspenseful can you get?" - House
I watched a programme on Robert Johnson, featuring Eric Clapton playing Johnson's music, It was most amusing and enlightening to hear Clapton being puzzled as to how Johnson managed to play what he did - "The first time I heard it I assumed it was two guitars (being played by two people) then I was told he was solo. I couldn't understand how". Ten years later, he can approximate the method, but only on a good day. Very self-effacing chap, Mr Clapton.
He seems to manage alright on this: http://www.amazon.co.uk/Sessions-Ro...=sr_1_5?ie=UTF8&s=music&qid=1219450636&sr=8-5
Using the patented Mavis Beacon "Hunt&Peck" Technique, Lozzo Not in this reality, bucko. "I'm sick, me".
A child will mimick actions from birth; simple things like the clenching of a fist etc. It's a shame that in later life they don't learn to shut the **** up when everyone else has
This album was the inspiration for the programme, or perhaps the programme was publicity for the album ... oh, it's a DVD as well, and from the description I watched an hour from the DVD on the telly. Anyway, the ten years referred to was prolly twenty years ago, iyswim. If you have the DVD (and it is what I watched) then you'll see the false starts EC makes. He almost idolises RJ, his music (and the methods he used to produce it) and the influence he had, not least to inspire EC. I just thought it was, err, gratifying in a way that a guitarist of Clapton's stature would struggle to reproduce techniques - or at least, struggle to reproduce the sound that RJ had, using every technique that EC has at his fingertips (and that's prolly quite a lot) - and that EC happily admits it.
Yeah, and just my luck to get the shitty end, right? I used to get paid to a) know and explain this stuff b) sort this stuff out c) get peolple to pay for sorting this stuff out. [I wouldn't have got away with typos like the one above then - referring to 1936 when I meant 1937 (specifically 1st October 1937) would deffo constitute an 'informality, defect or error' and render my Notice invalid.] Take an infinite number of fuckwits, shut them in a virtual room and make them discuss stuff. Sooner or later, they'll get something almost right.
It's as simple or as complicated as you want to make it. To give up, at some point you have to have smoked your last cigarette, and after that instant you are a non-smoker whether you choose to acknowledge the fact, or allow yourself to recognise it at the time, or not. Some people certainly seem to find a victim mentality easier. It's certainly easier when you fail -- as least it's not your fault then, eh?
I was thinking exactly the same thing. Incredible. -- Catman MIB#14 SKoGA#6 TEAR#4 BOTAFOF#38 Apostle#21 COSOC#3 Tyger, Tyger Burning Bright (Remove rust to reply) 116 Giulietta 3.0l Sprint 1.7 145 2.0 Cloverleaf 156 V6 2.5 S2 Triumph Sprint ST 1050: It's blue, see. www.cuore-sportivo.co.uk
What he said. The mains drain that runs behind the houses in our street is the responsibility of Thames Water (the houses were built in the 1920s). Our drain that links to this has recently gone phut, and is causing some slight cracking to the corner of the house as the ground softens. Insco informed, surveyors and drain bods sent, drain tested, yes, it needs to be replaced, yes you're insured, yes that includes propping up the sagging corner of the Chateau. Only slight bummer is the £1000 excess as it's classed as a subsidence claim.
I started smoking cigars (sometimes inhaling, which probably wasn't wise) aged 16 and smoked them for the next 15 years or so. Gave up as a New Year' resolution, 20 years ago, and to my surprise found it easy. No cravings, no pangs, no nothing. I'd like to say it was because of my incredible willpower, but I'm crap at that, so I always assumed that it was because cigars lacked the addictive ingredient of nicotine (or whatever it is). Then someone else said what you've just said: some people just don't get the withdrawal pangs. If you know more about this than I do (which seems to be the case), I'd love to know which is true. Are cigars addictive or did I just get lucky?
I'm the opposite. It was incredibly easy for me to give up my heavy drinking - I just stopped and felt no compulsion to start again. Ok, so I have the odd infrequent drink nowadays, but I was a regular heavy drinker of vodka to the extent that a litre in an evening wouldn't render me out of it. Giving up smoking is difficult for me though, and I've been trying now and then for the last 20 years. My daily intake is only about 5 or 6 roll-ups a day now from 40 B+H ten years ago, but I just can't manage to break the habit.