Paging Ace - you are now permitted to smile

Discussion in 'UK Motorcycles' started by TOG@Toil, Feb 9, 2008.

  1. TOG@Toil

    Ace Guest

    On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 05:43:13 -0800 (PST), in
    They're still likely to have a greater surface area, unless you're
    comparing with fat off-piste skis.
    IME waxing skis makes them faster for about half a day until it all
    wears off. Rental skis tend to be serviced fresh for each renter, so
    will certainly not suffer in that respect.
    *ding*

    Or alternatively - allowing faster speeds with the skis flat on the
    snow with less chance of catching an edge. Modern teaching techniques
    would emphasise that you're _always_ on one edge or the other, such
    that this wouldn't be an issue.
    No, they tend to use very long, almost completely straight skis. No
    more comparable to normal skis than those used for ski-jumping.
     
    Ace, Feb 26, 2008
    #41
    1. Advertisements

  2. TOG@Toil

    CT Guest

    ^^^^^^
    *boggle*

    Aren't all skis 'completely straight' then?
     
    CT, Feb 26, 2008
    #42
    1. Advertisements

  3. TOG@Toil

    TOG@Toil Guest

    When I learned, you held your arm up high, and cranked your palm over
    at 90 degrees, and the ski was supposed to fit snugly between your
    palm and the ground. That was in the wooden ski and lace-up boots era,
    mind.

    As a student, nearly 30 years ago, I skied on 205mm skis.

    <Fond memory>

    Rossignol Dracs. Went like split shit down a slope, and very stable in
    a straight line, but an absolute bugger to turn.

    </fm>

    I was amused to find that these days the skis are supposed to reach as
    high as your chin, or mouth, or nose, depending on experience and
    size.
    I'm tempted to grab another week at Easter....
     
    TOG@Toil, Feb 26, 2008
    #43
  4. TOG@Toil

    TOG@Toil Guest

    Fascinating. Because that is *exactly* how I found myself on these new
    skis, last week, even when supposedly schussing in a straight line. It
    improved stability enormously, and there was a marked tendency of the
    tips to wash out one way or t'other if I didn't. Not like my old
    planks at all.
     
    TOG@Toil, Feb 26, 2008
    #44
  5. I sold off my old skis gear when I retired ?10? years ago so my
    reference is old technology.
    My 190 Atomic composites with a waisted area after the binding were
    *very* fast down hill.
    The Rossignols 160 were no where near as fast but mogul fields flat out
    *no problem*.

    I also had a little electric waxer to treat the skis and an electric
    edger I bought in Freiburg im Breisgau. These made a big difference.
     
    Mick Whittingham, Feb 26, 2008
    #45
  6. TOG@Toil

    Hog Guest

    Heh welcome to 1997!
     
    Hog, Feb 26, 2008
    #46
  7. TOG@Toil

    Ace Guest

    Ace, Feb 26, 2008
    #47
  8. TOG@Toil

    CT Guest

    CT, Feb 26, 2008
    #48
  9. TOG@Toil

    MoonMan Guest

    nope, length limits are even more strict in the faster disciplines as are
    turn radii.


    --
    Chris *<:)

    Rule 1 - Me first
    Rule 2 - Downhill Good, Uphill BAD!
    Rule 3 - Skis at the bottom, Head at the top!

    www.suffolkvikings.org.uk
     
    MoonMan, Feb 26, 2008
    #49
  10. TOG@Toil

    Pete Fisher Guest

    In communiqué
    Only twenty years for me (a late starter on getting remarried). TBF the
    185s were always a tad too long for me really. I bought them used from
    Snow+Rock on impulse after getting to a standard good enough to want to
    ski regularly. Thought I would grow (skillwise) in to them.

    As Ace and others have said, probably time to start again on modern kit.
    Hmm, it is early this year isn't it. Our old skis are in the loft at the
    chateau, plus SWMBO's Elan cross country skis. Wonder if there will be
    enough snow left at Mont Dore to make it worth a day trip (a couple of
    hours run)?

    --
    +----------------------------------------------------------------+
    | Pete Fisher at Home: |
    | Voxan Roadster Gilera Nordwest * 2 Yamaha WR250Z |
    | Gilera GFR * 2 Moto Morini 2C/375 Morini 350 "Forgotten Error" |
    +----------------------------------------------------------------+
     
    Pete Fisher, Feb 26, 2008
    #50
  11. TOG@Toil

    Ace Guest

    "More strict"? Not sure how that could be so - there are minimum
    lengths for all categories, equally enforced.

    There is no mimimum radius defined for Slalom, and the desire to move
    to shorter skis was only really apparent there, as shown by the
    minimum length requirement of 165cm for Men's Slalom, c/w 215cm for
    men's downhill.
     
    Ace, Feb 26, 2008
    #51
  12. TOG@Toil

    MoonMan Guest

    Luckily for me the new regulations for skis have been downgraded to
    "recommendations" for Masters, I was going to have to get new GS skis for
    next year to comply with the new radius requirements.

    I meant that there was more regulation for the faster disciplines and In the
    few years I have been competeing - if you can call what I do competeing
    :( Ski lengths / radii for GS have changed at least twice.
     
    MoonMan, Feb 27, 2008
    #52
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.