[URL]http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/4872720.stm[/URL] Opps, at least no fatalities.
ISTR that the Galaxy was intended to be made in "civilian" versions too, but its accident record was so bad that it never happened. Paging the aircraft freaks. Weggy? What say you?
The C5 and the 747 were in a US military fly off to decide who would supply the next big freight transport. Hence both have the overhead cockpits with a clear cargo deck. Swing up noses and in the 747's case I think it was a swing sideways tail. Lockheed C5 won as the stronger aircraft. The 747 failed as the nose gear and supporting fuselage was deemed too weak. After it won the C5 needed a total wing spar redesign to stop the wings falling off after 1000 cycles (at a huge cost). Boeing took its failed transport and turned it into a world beating passenger plane that often gets scraped because the nose wheel punches up through the fuselage on a heavy landing. HTH
That squares with what a former colleague once told me. Apparently they didn't operate anywhere near the original design specification for payload except in times of war. Mind ewe, that's probably "always" nowadays. Presumably they no longer have that restriction? This guy was an NCO in US airbase security and came out with some fascinating tales and factoids about US aircraft.
One would hope not. Wright brothers first flight could have taken place in its hold with out opening the doors. It holds the world record for the number of passengers taken. I think it was over 1200 children and mothers as the last flight out of Saigon when the sh*t hit the fan for the US. The ANTONOV AN-225 is a bigun. I watched it when I thought it was taxiing at a Farnborough air show. Then it rotated and climbed out. http://www.airliners.net/open.file?id=0972170&WxsIERv=Nagbabi Na-225 Zevln&Wm=0&WdsYXMg=Nagbabi%20Qrfvta%20Ohernh&QtODMg=Rvaqubira%20%28-%20Jr yfpunc%29%20%28RVA%20%2F%20RURU%29&ERDLTkt=Argureynaqf&ktODMp=Bpgbore%202 7%2C%202005&BP=1&WNEb25u=Znnegraj&xsIERvdWdsY=HE-82060&MgTUQtODMgKE=Zelvn %20%28Qernz%29%20gheavat%20yrsg%20gbjneqf%20zr%20jura%20fur%20neevirf%20g ur%20pnetb-jrfg.%20Zelvn%20vf%20urer%20sbe%20VSBE%20genafcbeg%20jvgu%20tb bqf%20sbe%20Cnxvfgna&YXMgTUQtODMgKERD=21828&NEb25uZWxs=2005-12-07%2018%3A 06%3A03&ODJ9dvCE=&O89Dcjdg=13102&static=yes&width=1200&height=812&sok=JUR ER%20%20%28nvepensg_trarevp%20%3D%20%27Nagbabi%20Na-225%20Zevln%27%29%20% 20BEQRE%20OL%20cubgb_vq%20QRFP&photo_nr=7&prev_id=0975254&next_id=0971047 #