Question...

Didn't you see the question marks?

 

Double-****; Nev spotted it before I did!

 

You compete with each other to ignore what people are saying in favour
of castigating them for spelling errors?

 

P'raps that might discourage more Bullys from illegally using a disabled
spot (and that would be a good thing) but it'd cause a hell of a lot of
trouble and work every time there's a re-calculation of fines. (Not to
mention cost!)
There's no table of fines on speed signs, no-standing, keep left,
red-light, clearway, bus-lane etc etc etc so I can't really imagine that
it's any sort of defence or excuse though.

 

Not really a spelling error; just the wrong word. (Damn homonyms!)
Beside; we're responding to your every post.... how can you pretend we're
ignoring what you're saying?

 

You mean "besides".

 

As an aside, yes.

 

I occasionally gently roll the bike along them in such a way as to not
endanger or delay the acoustics ... reckon it helps people from opening
their doors / crossing the pushie lane without looking .

PS: The reason you shouldn't park in Disabled spots unless you need to
is because it's ungentlemanly.

-----sharks

 

Erm a flaw in your logic. A<B!=B<A

 

Thank you. I don't think the OP will appreciate how eloquently you put
that, but I do. It's 'cretin' BTW. Either way, he's got it.

 

There been more than one threat of violence is this thread.

Nope but English appears to be a second language for a few people in here.

 

Something in my brains will never allow me to comply with that logic!

 

You shouldn't presume.
All Parking tickets are the lowest form of offence. The penalties should
reflect that. $384 for a parking ticket is absurd.

 

Quit your whinging.

 

<sigh> education is bypassed for punishment once more.

Whilst it is an inconvenience, there are far more insipid things that can
occur to people with disabilities.

Hammo

 

I make a tongue in cheek post, and you choose to use it to support your
view? I guess if you're stupid enough to get a $384 parking fine...

Nev..
'04 CBR1100XX

 

It's not really for him to decide what is a suitable means of
transportation for someone else.

Nev..
'04 CBR1100XX

 

Erm, this is a discussion group. Last time I checked discussion groups were
for discussing stuff.

No-one is forcing you to participate. That's the beauty of usenet.

 

So selfish is ok now? Make up your mind would you....

 

How is this different thanif a geniunely disabled person parked in the
spot?. The next disabled person faces the exact same risk (according to your
logic).
If the penalty is based aorund this supposed risk, then anyone parking in
the spot is guilty.