sign it! :-) [URL]http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/SORN-rules/[/URL]
I like the idea, but I'm not sure you can do it... mind you, steel toecap boots are exempt, as "safety equipment", so it's possible - it would mean that they'd need to be called "safety boots" and not "cool bike bootz", ditto other stuff, "safety oversuit" not "race leathers", probably. but still, I'll sign it.
Up to you. out of mild interest, in what way do you think it's poorly worded? aside from one typo that got through despite my reading it about 6 times...
Ta, I don't like be ordered around Ok, so just the pre "more info" bit. But, I disagree that once a SORN is declared it remains off road. A scrote will not be bothered, you may sell it and not declare the sale etc etc. I keep 2 off road, I get a reminder, I SORN them, I don't forget. I keep 2 cars and 3 bikes on the road, I get reminders, I tax them, I don't forget. I have no issue with SORN. Now.... people who park on yellow lines. people who have reg plates that spell "WANKER". people who insist on using fog lights when not foggy. These things I do have an issue with ........
If you sell it and don't declare it, then anything the scrote does is traced back to you... no thank you... I have no issue with SORN, but it still only needs declaring once per vehicle/SORN period.
And each SORN period has been declared as 12months by the government A lot of people complain about SORN because the "forget" to do it and then get upset when they are fined. Just like they "forget" they are speeding, "forget" that there are yellow lines under their wheels etc
which is the stupid bit... that's not the main issue, really - I don't really mind paying 40 quid for being so careless as to forget to renew it, seeing as I know the rules. However, there's still no point in it needing renewing - I've not seen anyone advance a good reason for renewing it annually, or any credible benefit from so doing.
well, yeah. It was just a comment about nomenclature - if you want vat-exempt 'cos it's "safety apparatus" then it's liable to have to be known as such, not as a "go-faster race suit".
Well, any vehicle that's not taxed must by default be off-road unless it's being used illegally, so the declaration is utterly redundant in the first place. The current system doesn't stop someone from making a declaration then simply using a vehicle anyway; it's just a PITA (OK, a minor one) for the vast majority who don't take the piss. It smells of control-freakery. IMO a government should strive to tread as lightly as possible while maintaining a society. I suppose there may be some sort of legal gotcha where they can penalize for making a false declaration in addition to driving untaxed, but that's the only 'benefit' that I can see. These should be shot. No mercy.
I came up with a word for them Elsewhere a little while ago -- fog-wits. -- Ivan Reid, School of Engineering & Design, _____________ CMS Collaboration, Brunel University. Ivan.Reid@[brunel.ac.uk|cern.ch] Room 40-1-B12, CERN GSX600F, RG250WD "You Porsche. Me pass!" DoD #484 JKLO#003, 005 WP7# 3000 LC Unit #2368 (tinlc) UKMC#00009 BOTAFOT#16 UKRMMA#7 (Hon) KotPT -- "for stupidity above and beyond the call of duty".
Precisely - this seems to be more about "I'm too lazy to remember" rather than any pertinent benefit to the updating of the UK vehicle stock. Oh yes.
Ooo, apart from reminding someone they have sold the machine, and making sure it has been declared/registered ?
Yes, but declaring it sold/tranferred is a one-off form to fill in which the seller has good incentive to remember. After that it's not the seller's (more accurately, the former keeper's) problem. SORN just goes on and on and on....