Spagthorpe(R) Motorcycles

Discussion in 'UK Motorcycles' started by TLSG, Apr 5, 2004.

  1. TLSG

    TLSG Guest

    I Decided to look for some inormation on Spagthorpe(R), as I realized
    I knew the name, but nothing about the company.

    The first image the turned up was this jpg
    http://www.spagthorpe.com/production/rottweiler.html

    How terribly tragic.

    They were pioneers in the develepment of new technologies including
    rotarian valves, the "five-and-a-half-cylinder" engine and of course the
    wonderful eight cylinder, 40 valve, 124.5cc Feral Flea.

    Quote:
    "There was, of course, the Spagthorpe Wrestler engine, which was a
    horizontally opposed twin having no crankshaft and a single rod
    connecting the two pistons. Teeth on the top and bottom of this rod
    drove gears which transmitted the motions to the gearbox. The pistons
    were lead weighted to provide sufficient momentum to complete the
    complex Three-And-A-Half-With-A-Wiggly-Bit-Thrown-In-For-Good-Measure
    stroke system that was the masterstroke behind this engine"

    http://www.spagthorpe.com/production/summary.html

    And what evocotive names the motorcycles had !
    Birddog, Werewolf, Chihuahua, Doberman, Pug ! to name but a few.

    The modern era of Spagthorne(R) promises to be as exciting and daring
    as the last 100 years.

    Long may they continue !
     
    TLSG, Apr 5, 2004
    #1
    1. Advertisements

  2. TLSG

    Logorrhea Guest

    Ah, Spagthorpe; a splendid manufacturer of quality motor-bicycles. I feel
    certian that, as a connoisseur of such machinery, you would also be
    interested in the equally renowned [that is to say, largely forgotten]
    builder of the Excalibur, the Empire Excalibur and the Wildebeeste, to say
    nothing of the prototype X5 Ladies' Monocycle:

    http://www.hurley-pugh.co.uk
     
    Logorrhea, Apr 5, 2004
    #2
    1. Advertisements

  3. TLSG

    TLSG Guest

    I say Sir !

    A most elucidating and informative website if i may say so, and one by
    which the cockles of my heart are warmed immensly by.
     
    TLSG, Apr 5, 2004
    #3
  4. TLSG

    TLSG Guest

    You absolute *Rotter* Sir !
     
    TLSG, Apr 5, 2004
    #4
  5. TLSG

    Klaatu Guest

    Does one get a grant for such obfuscations ?

    For years I have toying with the idea, in combustion engines, of having
    valves as part of the piston. The basic idea is to remove any lost
    movement from any camshaft/pushrod arrangement. If, by the action of the
    piston moving downwards, the valve was naturally opened, to the correct
    amount, and for the correct duration (dwell ?) this removes any need to
    connect cranks to chains to camshafts.
     
    Klaatu, Apr 5, 2004
    #5
  6. Cracking idea. If you had some sort of one-way valve opening into the
    combustion chamber, then the low pressure from the piston down-stroke could
    be used to draw the mixture into the cylinder. Some sort of reed or flap
    valve would do. If you had the mixture inducted into the crankcase in the
    first place, then the piston downstroke could be used to pressurise it so it
    went up through the piston via the one-way inlet valve. The succeeding
    upstroke could then pressurise the mixture in the cylinder for combustion.
    If you could then arrange some sort of exhaust valve to dump the burned
    mixture after it had imparted most of its energy to the piston, then you
    could have a power stroke on every revolution of the crank. The exhaust
    valve would have to be situated so that it wouldn't open at the top of the
    stroke, otherwise your bmep would be gone for a ball of chalk. If you
    situated it on the side of the barrel, then it wouldn't operate until it was
    uncovered by the descending piston. And the pressurised mixture coming up
    from the crankcase would help blow the burnt gasses out the exhaust valve.

    Thinking about it, if the exhaust valve isn't exposed until you need to vent
    the gasses, it would work better if you didn't fit a valve at all, just had
    it porting directly into the exhaust pipe. Also, the inlet valve would have
    an easier time of it if it was protected from the actual combustion in the
    same way as the exhaust was, by being let into the cylinder wall - and if it
    was opposite the exhaust port, it would be more effective in blowing the
    exhaust gasses out of the cylinder. You'd need to arrange some sort of pipe
    to take the pressurised mixture from the crankcase to the inlet, though.

    I reckon you're onto something.

    --
    Platypus - (surreal)
    Triumph Trophy 1200 (The Incredible Hulk)
    VN800 Drifter (still for sale)
    R80RT (for sale - spares or repairs)
    Z200 (Fear the Distance Monster!)
    DIAABTCOD#2 GPOTHUF#19
    BOTAFOS#6 BOTAFOT#89 FTB#11
    BOB#1 SBS#35 ANORAK#18 TWA#15
     
    pringleplatypus, Apr 6, 2004
    #6
  7. TLSG

    Cammo Guest

    Bwaaaaaahahahahahahahaha!

    --
    Cammo
    VT500 Rat
    GSX750SE Katana
    GT250-X7
    GT380
    http://cammo.webs.bikers-engine.com
    cammo at bikers-engine dot com
     
    Cammo, Apr 6, 2004
    #7
  8. TLSG

    mups Guest

    <snip>

    Heh, what sort of weirdo would have a bike with an engine like that.
     
    mups, Apr 6, 2004
    #8
  9. TLSG

    TLSG Guest

    TLSG, Apr 6, 2004
    #9
  10. TLSG

    TLSG Guest

    How about using hydraulics to open valves. If the action of the piston
    moving down - or up for that matter - was used to open valves, would
    this not be efficient ?

    I also had a design in mind once for a spherical valve that would be
    continually spinning, a bit like a needle roller bearing, difficult to
    describe here though.


    1. I know F1 cars use hydraulic valves - are they not operated by
    electric solenoinds ?
     
    TLSG, Apr 6, 2004
    #10
  11. Klaatu wrote
    It is called a transfer port.
     
    steve auvache, Apr 6, 2004
    #11
  12. mups wrote
    Lozzo.
     
    steve auvache, Apr 6, 2004
    #12
  13. TLSG

    TLSG Guest

    TLSG, Apr 6, 2004
    #13
  14. TLSG

    Ben Blaney Guest

    Thank you Mr Murray.
     
    Ben Blaney, Apr 6, 2004
    #14
  15. TLSG

    Lozzo Guest

    steve auvache says...
    I hadn't realised the Thunderace, GPZ500 and CB250RS were 2-strokes.

    --
    Lozzo : The anti-Timo
    YZF1000R, GPZ500S, CB250RS x3
    BOTAFOT#57/70a, BOTAFOF#57, MIB#22, TCP#7,
    ANORAK#9, DIAABTCOD#14, UKRMT5BB, IBW#013, MIRTTH#15a/16,
    BotToS#8, GP#2, SBS#10, SH#3, DFV#14, BONY#9.
    Url for ukrm newbies : http://www.ukrm.net/faq/ukrmscbt.html
    http://www.glfuk.com/ for MJK Leathers in the UK.
    Artificial intelligence is no match for natural stupidity.
     
    Lozzo, Apr 6, 2004
    #15
  16. Lozzo wrote
    I thought we were talking about weirdos riding motorbikes.
     
    steve auvache, Apr 6, 2004
    #16
  17. It was somewhere around Barstow, on the edge of the desert, when the
    drugs began to take hold. I remember "Dr Ivan D. Reid"
    Ricardo, afair, invented a rotary valve in the 1920s. It's all been done
    before, the only thing that stood in the way of things taking off was
    the inadequate materials science of the day.

    --

    Dave

    GS 850 x2 / SE 6a
    SbS#6 DIAABTCOD#16 APOSTLE#6 FUB#3
    FUB KotL OSOS#12? UKRMMA#19 COSOC#10
     
    Grimly Curmudgeon, Apr 6, 2004
    #17
  18. TLSG

    TLSG Guest

    I haven't, but I wish that I had.
    Yes, Pneumatic.
     
    TLSG, Apr 7, 2004
    #18
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.