Strange incident on the news.

Discussion in 'Australian Motorcycles' started by krazykol, Dec 4, 2006.

  1. krazykol

    krazykol Guest

    Not quite motorcycle related, but could just have easily happened to one of

    On a local news report there was the story of a rear ender (which I happened
    passed on the way home from work) where someone was stopped in a passing
    lane to turn right accross double white lines into a driveway and was
    smashed into from behind by someone using the over taking lane for (oh my
    god how dare they) over taking (a truck) and would have not been able to see
    her before pulling out. I know the spot well and he would have had little to
    no chance of seeing her in advance. Now the news lady made a big song and
    dance about (mostly because the police officer who was interviewed did) how
    the guy doing the over taking was being charged with reckless use of a
    vehicle. Mean while nothing was said about the lady stopped in the passing
    lane (did I mention on the Bruce Highway) being charged with anything at
    all. Now surely (and I'm not involved in law inforcement so I have only
    (what little) common sense I have) she should have been charge with at least
    half a dozen offenses (far more than the poor barstard who hit her)?

    Does anyone have any idea how this would have played out in states other
    than the insanity state (Qld)?

    krazykol, Dec 4, 2006
    1. Advertisements

  2. krazykol

    Nev.. Guest

    Also in Victoria, just to be different to everyone else, where it is
    permissible to turn across double lines into a driveway, there is a
    break in the double white lines to indicate this, so the 'no crossing
    double lines' rule has no exceptions.

    '04 CBR1100XX
    Nev.., Dec 4, 2006
    1. Advertisements

  3. krazykol

    smack Guest

    Sections 150 and 27 of the Queensland Road Rules (PDF, 2.87mb*) apply.

    What does a continuous white single centre line mean?
    A continuous white single centre line (dividing line) may be crossed to
    enter or leave the road and when turning to or from property. You must not
    overtake across this line.
    smack, Dec 4, 2006
  4. krazykol

    Dale Porter Guest

    In Victoria a single continuous white centre line is simply a means to divide directions. A driver is permitted to overtake to the
    right of the centre dividing line.

    Rules 132(2) & 134(2)
    Dale Porter, Dec 4, 2006
  5. krazykol

    justAL Guest

    Just goes to show how close this guy was to the back of the truck.

    justAL, Dec 4, 2006
  6. krazykol

    smack Guest

    134(3) says if it's a double unbroken, then you can't cross it. Nev wins
    smack, Dec 4, 2006
  7. krazykol

    F Murtz Guest

    Turning right over two lines IS to enter your driveway. you lose
    F Murtz, Dec 4, 2006
  8. krazykol

    Dale Porter Guest

    So the big question is, why the hell did he pull out from behind the truck when he did not have a clear view. Too impatient to wait
    till he had a better view? Certainly sounds like a careless maneuver on his part.
    Dale Porter, Dec 4, 2006
  9. krazykol

    Nev.. Guest

    Because he didn't expect there to be a stationary vehicle in the
    overtaking lane.

    '04 CBR1100XX
    Nev.., Dec 4, 2006
  10. krazykol

    smack Guest

    When I was a lad you could cross DOUBLE unbroken to get to a driveway, but
    the wording above says SINGLE continous white line. So I'm waiting for
    clarification on that.
    smack, Dec 5, 2006
  11. krazykol

    Dale Porter Guest

    Which is exactly why he should have waited till he had a clear view.
    Dale Porter, Dec 5, 2006
  12. krazykol

    Dale Porter Guest

    Read the .pdf document smack. It's right there. In Vic you may cross a single continuous white line, but not double continuous white

    And as stated earlier in the thread by Nev.......
    Dale Porter, Dec 5, 2006
  13. krazykol

    G-S Guest

    Ummm unless the law has changed it isn't legal... they put breaks in
    double lines for driveways where people need to do what you are talking

    No break, then no entry to the driveway.

    G-S, Dec 5, 2006
  14. krazykol

    G-S Guest

    One could argue that he pulled out in order to 'obtain' a clear view.

    G-S, Dec 5, 2006
  15. krazykol

    Dale Porter Guest

    If he was in a LHD vehicle then I could understand it to a degree. But it doesn't take much movement to the right to get a much
    clearer view in an RHD vehicle.
    Dale Porter, Dec 5, 2006
  16. In on Tue, 05 Dec 2006 18:28:36 +1100
    Rule 134
    (3) If the dividing line is not 2 parallel continuous dividing
    the driver may drive to the right of the dividing line:
    (a) to enter or leave the road; or

    That's the Oz road rules, I don't think any of the states have decided
    to ditch that one.

    Zebee Johnstone, Dec 5, 2006
  17. krazykol

    Nev.. Guest

    Yeah, you just have to move out far enough to hit a parked car
    apparently. :)

    '04 CBR1100XX
    Nev.., Dec 5, 2006
  18. krazykol

    G-S Guest

    So when it _is_ 2 parallel continuous driving lines one may not (which
    is the same as 'no break then no entry').

    G-S, Dec 6, 2006
  19. In on Wed, 06 Dec 2006 21:06:55 +1100
    exactly. I was agreeing with you :)

    Zebee Johnstone, Dec 6, 2006
  20. krazykol

    G-S Guest

    oh.... ok....
    (not used to that type look) :)

    G-S, Dec 7, 2006
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.