Suzuki B-King

Discussion in 'UK Motorcycles' started by Cab, Dec 20, 2007.

  1. Cab

    Cab Guest

    Forgot to mention that I took this out for a test ride this w/e.

    From the looks side of things, it's a very sexy looking bike.
    Practically it has a few issues though. I don't think it'll be that
    easy to fit accessories such as a screen (due to the weird shape of the
    headlight) or a tank bag (because it has the ignition key on the tank).
    Suzuki have got a range of accessories in the pipeline, due to come out
    in March. There's a lot of plastic on the bike, which I think may be an
    issue in any sort of spills. Even 0 mph drops. On the version I tried,
    there were crash bungs, which may take a bit of shock, but not very
    much. It's a heavy bike, but handles very well. It actually goes round
    corners easily. :)

    The version I rode was (surprisingly enough)
    strangled^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H restricted. However the ride showed that it
    was still a very torquey bike and it showed with standing accelerations
    and on the nearby motorway. Being used to the GSX1400, I felt that the
    power/torque side of things was quite similar. There was this nifty
    switch (activated at standstill) which either gives you the full power
    (yeah, yeah, right, right) or 75% (apparently) power. "A" for full, "B"
    for 75%. Even with 106 horses, you could feel the difference between
    the two settings. With nearly new tyres, I felt the back end try to
    slide away from me once or twice with the "A" setting. Mind you, that
    was only until I got used to the bike. The engine is a detuned 'busa
    engine, I believe.

    The brakes are good and provide decent stopping power. The rear end is
    quite soft though. It could be the suspension set up, but I didn't get
    chance to fiddle around with it. The tyres were dunlops. I've not had a
    lot of experience with dunlops, so I couldn't say whether they're good
    or bad. They were okay for the roads that I took though.

    It also had an on-board computer to give you average speed, etc. Nice
    to know. Especially with the small tank. It's only 16.5l, FFS. It's all
    that plastic hiding it! I can't see the range being that good for a big
    bike, small tank, big engine.

    I think it's going to be a bike that people will love or hate. A bit
    like my GSX1400 (which is no longer built apparently). It's a nice
    concept bike. I'm not sure I'd buy one though.
     
    Cab, Dec 20, 2007
    #1
    1. Advertisements

  2. Cab

    Hog Guest

    The only picture I've seen of the B-Kink that had merit was this one
    http://bp2.blogger.com/_Mvhjidbvdzc/RyYV8a2h3PI/AAAAAAAAC6I/stmdOaIIlZs/s1600-h/B-King+2.jpg
    NWS

    The rear view looks like Dame Edna's specs but I did like the instrument
    setup.
     
    Hog, Dec 20, 2007
    #2
    1. Advertisements

  3. Cab

    Peter Brooks Guest

    Peter Brooks, Dec 20, 2007
    #3
  4. Cab

    Cab Guest

    Looks like the one I rode.
     
    Cab, Dec 21, 2007
    #4
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.