Tasmanian Road Safety (cough, front numberplate) Strategy

Discussion in 'Australian Motorcycles' started by conehead, Nov 5, 2003.

  1. conehead

    conehead Guest

    I have a .pdf copy of the Ulysses Club's response to the 'safety' strategy
    working paper, but in my advancing senility I can't remember how to put it
    on a website.

    Anyone interested in putting it on a site? It's 60kb.
     
    conehead, Nov 5, 2003
    #1
    1. Advertisements

  2. Email it to aaronkylieatsitedotcomdotau

    Aaron
    ZX6R
     
    Aaron & Kylie, Nov 5, 2003
    #2
    1. Advertisements

  3. conehead

    conehead Guest

    Thanks, Aaron. Has been done.
     
    conehead, Nov 5, 2003
    #3
  4. Aaron & Kylie, Nov 5, 2003
    #4
  5. conehead

    Nev.. Guest

    You'd reckon they'd run a spell checker over it before they submitted it.

    Signed off by the Ulysses club national vice president Neville Grey. The same
    Ulysses club national vice president Neville Grey who flew from Adelaide to
    Melbourne to consult with the Victorian Government shortly before they
    announced the introduction of the $50 motorcycle levy and then published
    comments on the Ulysses club website saying that the Victorian riders should
    accept the levy as inevitable and stop whinging. When are you old farts going
    to get rid of him?

    Nev..
    '03 ZX12R
    '02 CBR1100XX
     
    Nev.., Nov 5, 2003
    #5
  6. conehead

    CrazyCam Guest

    Nev.. wrote:

    Dunno.

    Although I am a card-carrying Old Fart, I have no input into the
    democratic processes of running the Ulysses Club.
    (Not that I'm complaining.)

    Lets get serious about this, tho. The Vic $50 thing was pretty much
    inevitable. We (as in motorcyclists) are a fairly insignificant minority
    of the population. Even within that minority, we have widely differing
    views on just about anything. We are not very organised in a political
    sense, and most of us just want to ride our bikes.
    So governments can basically do what they like to us.

    What, exactly, did you expect the U.C. to do about it?

    What would you have done in Neville Grey's place?

    regards,
    CrazyCam
     
    CrazyCam, Nov 5, 2003
    #6
  7. conehead

    Goaty Guest

    I joined Ulysses to go riding. IMHO it has too much bureaucratic
    overhead anyhow. If it never did a political thing in its life I'd be
    well pleased.

    I can have much better politicial input through other mechanisms.

    Cheers
    Goaty
     
    Goaty, Nov 5, 2003
    #7
  8. conehead

    Nev.. Guest

    Strange point of view from someone who is (unless I am mistaken) a
    representative on the NSW MCC. Why then do you support the input the NSW MCC
    has in steering government policy instead of just rolling over and taking
    whatever is inevitable up the clacker? So you'd support the introduction of a
    $50 levy in NSW?
    Represent the best interests of their members? Shown solidarity with other
    motorcycling organisations in the state? Not partaken in secret talks with
    politicians?
    I dunno, should they consult with the members to find out what the clubs
    position should be? As I understand it, Neville Grey may have been the only
    motorcycling organisation representative which the Victorian Government
    consulted before introducing the levy - probably because he represented the
    greatest proportion of riders in the state. (They may have also consulted one
    on one with the then president of the MRAA however he has since passed away).

    Nev..
    '03 ZX12R
    '02 CBR1100XX
     
    Nev.., Nov 6, 2003
    #8
  9. conehead

    Gary Woodman Guest

    It was explained to me, in no uncertain terms, both times I've been to a
    Ulysses meeting, that Ulysses is not about politics. In my experience, the
    members say (many expressions to the effect of) "**** Politics!"

    So, in Nev's terms, they deliberately set out to, actually want to "just
    rolling over and taking whatever is inevitable up the clacker."

    Strangely enough, Ulysses himself was no shrinking violet in the overtly
    political world of the Late Bronze Age. Anyone remember how he dealt with
    the suitors?

    Gary
     
    Gary Woodman, Nov 6, 2003
    #9
  10. conehead

    Nev.. Guest

    Yes I have always understood this to be the case Gary, which only goes to make
    it all the more puzzling why the national vice president flew to Melbourne to
    hold consultations with the Victorian Government prior to the introduction of
    the $50 levy.

    Nev..
    '03 ZX12R
    '02 CBR1100XX
     
    Nev.., Nov 6, 2003
    #10
  11. conehead

    vinyl Guest

    Maybe they had as much result preventing its implementation as you and every
    other Victoria who tried did, Nev?
     
    vinyl, Nov 6, 2003
    #11
  12. conehead

    Nev.. Guest

    Nope, I don't believe that at all. If that were the case, surely the word
    would have been leaked and something could have been done. Its a lot easier
    to get government policy changed before it becomes policy rather than after.
    Prior to the formal announcement it can be withdrawn without the government
    being seen to be backing down. The first anyone heard about the $50 levy was
    at the announcement of the Victorian state budget, of which it was a part, and
    everyone who was playing that hand held their cards very close to their chest.

    Nev..
    '03 ZX12R
    '02 CBR1100XX
     
    Nev.., Nov 6, 2003
    #12
  13. conehead

    vinyl Guest

    I think we're talking at cross purposes.
     
    vinyl, Nov 6, 2003
    #13
  14. conehead

    Gary Woodman Guest

    Indeed. I wonder if he felt duty bound to report on his consultation to
    the membership. I wonder if he actually did report on his consultation to
    the membership. As if the members cared; that would inevitably be "too
    political".

    Gary (as if I cared)
     
    Gary Woodman, Nov 6, 2003
    #14
  15. conehead

    CrazyCam Guest

    You are not mistaken, but, part of the brief was that the U.C, is
    non-poticical.....unless _severely_ pushed.
    No I wouldn't suppory the levy in NSW,,,,,, not that my opinion would be
    worth a damn!

    Nev, what, exactly, do _you_ know about democracy?

    The NSW Motorcycle Council isn't a democratic body.

    How _legitimate_ was the vote for Zebee, or John L.?

    Don't get me wrong, I'm not picking on either of those persons, but, I
    was attending the MCC as a rep of MacMod...(also non-elected, but I was
    nearby, anmd silly enough to go.)... and I was asked, by a then-National
    Committee Member, if I'd "stand-in" for him. I said yes.
    How? There are over 20,000 members, many (uncounted!) with the feeling
    that U.C. is apolitical. (Hi there Goaty!)

    I know it is dificult to handle......but the biggest bike club in Oz,
    has, at heart, the concept of being a-political? (So hang me for it! :-|)
    Nev. I am really sory to burst any bubble of thought you may have of
    democracy, political fairness, and similar phantoms of the folk not
    paying attention to the real world, but....as one of the spokespersons
    for U.C. on the NSWMCC, I am constantly aware of both the number of
    bikies I represent, _and_ the potential for lack of support. <shrug>

    As for Nev. Grey. he's a big lad....all grown up.... If you want to
    pick on him.....go for it.

    If you want to make a constructive suggestion as to what he could have
    done...... I (for one!) am all ears.

    regards,
    CrazyCam
     
    CrazyCam, Nov 6, 2003
    #15
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.